Comparison of p16ink4a immunostaining in benign and malignant HPV-related lesion

Authors

  • Ana Paula Oliveira Castro Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
  • Priscila Lie Tobouti Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
  • Suzana Cantanhede Orsini Machado Sousa Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2015.97169

Keywords:

Descriptors, HPV, p16, Papilloma, Condyloma acuminate, Squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Objective: We aim to analyze the difference between p16inka immunostaining in normal epithelium, two benign HPV-related lesions (papilloma and condyloma acuminatum) and one malignant HPV-related lesion (oropharynx carcinoma).

Methods: Five normal oral mucosas, fifteen papiloma, fifteen condyloma acuminatum and fifteen HPV-positive OSCC were included in the present study. Histological sections were stained anti-p16ink4a by immunohistochemistry. For the positive stain, score was based on a scale of - to 3+, as follows: - negative stain; 1+ less than 25% of positivity and focal distribution; 2+ 26-50% positivity and focal distribution; and 3+ 50-75% of positive cells and diffuse distribution. As for the evaluation of the intensity score was based on: - negative; 1- low intensity; 2- moderate intensity; 3- intensive.

Results: The results showed no significant differences between the scores (positive x intensity) of p16ink4a in normal epithelium, papilloma and condyloma acuminatum. All these 3 lesions showed significant differences when compared with the oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma.

Relevance: There are differences in the expression of p16ink4a between benign HPV-lesions and malignant HPV-lesions. Also, it is not possible to identify the presence of HPV by the detection of p16ink4a using IHC in benign lesions, as has been used in OSCC. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ana Paula Oliveira Castro, Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
    Department Oral Pathology. School of dentistry. University of São Paulo
  • Priscila Lie Tobouti, Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
    Department Oral Pathology. School of dentistry. University of São Paulo
  • Suzana Cantanhede Orsini Machado Sousa, Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
    Department Oral Pathology. School of dentistry. University of São Paulo

Downloads

Published

2015-12-26

Issue

Section

Original Research