Effectiveness of sunscreens and factors influencing sun protection: a review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e20693

Keywords:

Sunscreen Agents, Emulsions, Ultraviolet Rays, Efficacy, Cosmetics

Abstract

The effectiveness of sun protection depends directly on the photo-protective product employed, the way it is used and the amount applied. Many studies report that sunscreens are often applied incorrectly, at amounts much lower than those recommended for the sun protection factor (SPF) specified on the label. When not used properly, the effectiveness of the product against sun exposure damage is reduced. Currently, sunscreens are available in a variety of different formulations and types, such as stick (bar), aerosol, cream, lotion, oil, tanning formulations and makeup. However, developing an effective stable photo-protective formula that can be correctly applied regardless of type poses a challenge, as effectiveness is dependent on several factors. Factors influencing effectiveness include sun exposure conditions (direct or indirect), level of protection (SPF), amount of product applied, maximum exposure period before reapplication, product type (spray, lotion, etc.), layer thickness required, coverage, and ability to spread and permeate into the skin. Studies comparing the effectiveness of different forms of sunscreens, the amount of product applied by consumers and SPF and UVA protection determined by validated methodologies, are lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to review the available literature on the topic and discuss the effectiveness of sunscreen formulations and factors influencing sun protection. This review was carried out on the scientific databases MEDLINE, PubMed and Scielo. Of the many publications retrieved, thirty-nine articles most relevant for this review were selected

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Lucas Portilho, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas

  • Laura Moretti Aiello, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

    Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas

  • Ediléia Bagatin, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

    Departamento de Dermatologia

  • Gislaine Ricci Leonardi, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

    Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas

  • Louise Idalgo Vasques

    Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas

References

Altieri L, Miller KA, Huh J, Peng DH, Unger JB, Richardson JL, et al. Prevalence of sun protection behaviors in Hispanic youth residing in a high ultraviolet light environment. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(1):e52-e4.

Alvarez-Roman R, Barre G, Guy RH, Fessi H. Biodegradable polymer nanocapsules containing a sunscreen agent: preparation and photoprotection. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;52(2):191-5.

Bagatin E, Parada MOB, Miot HA, Hassun KM, Michalany NS, Talarico S. A randomized and controlled trial about the use of oral isotretinoin for photoaging. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(2):207-214.

Beani JC. Solar protection products: efficacy and risks. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2012;139(4):261-72.

Binks BP, Fletcher PDI, Johnson AJ, Marinopoulos I, Crowther J, Thompson MA. How the sun protection factor (SPF) of sunscreen films change during solar irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2017;333:186-99.

Chao LX, Sheu SL, Kong BY, Rademaker AW, Kundu RV. Identifying gaps in consumer knowledge about sunscreen. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(6):1172-3.

Couteau C, Diarra H, Coiffard L. Effect of the product type, of the amount of applied sunscreen product and the level of protection in the UVB range on the level of protection achieved in the UVA range. Int J Pharm. 2016;500(1-2):210-6.

Couteau C, Paparis E, Coiffard LJ. Sun oils: effect of the applied dose on SPF determined by using in vitro method. Pharm Dev Technol. 2014;19(3):315-7.

Couteau C, Paparis E, El-Bourry-Alami S, Coiffard LJ. Influence on SPF of the quantity of sunscreen product applied. Int J Pharm . 2012;437(1-2):250-2.

Cozzi AC, Perugini P, Gourion-Arsiquaud S. Comparative behavior between sunscreens based on free or encapsulated UV filters in term of skin penetration, retention and photo-stability. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;121:309-18.

DeBuys HV, Levy SB, Murray JC, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Modern approaches to photoprotection. Dermatol Clin. 2000;18(4):577-90.

Durand L, Habran N, Denis C, Meulders L, Henschel V, Amighi K. Influence of different parameters on droplet size and size distribution of sprayable sunscreen emulsions with high concentration of UV-filters. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2007;29(6):461-71.

Funasaka Y, Ichihashi M, Nishigori C, Miyachi Y, Uetsu N, Horio T. Clinical evaluation of NOV® UV shield (sunscreen product) on its safety and utility. 2000;42(1):101-11.

Galvez MV, Aguilera J, Buendia EA, Sanchez-Roldan C, Herrera-Ceballos E. Tc. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(4):e123-e4.

Gomez-Berrada MP, Ficheux AS, Rakotomalala S, Guillou S, Bellec M, De Javel D, et al. Consumption and exposure assessment to sunscreen products: A key point for safety assessment. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;114:170-9.

Heerfordt IM, Philipsen PA, Larsen BO, Wulf HC. Long-term Trend in Sunscreen Use among Beachgoers in Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(10):1202-1205.

Heerfordt IM, Torsnes LR, Philipsen PA, Wulf HC. Photoprotection by sunscreen depends on time spent on application. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018;34(2):117-21.

Hexsel CL, Bangert SD, Hebert AA, Lim HW. Current sunscreen issues: 2007 Food and Drug Administration sunscreen labelling recommendations and combination sunscreen/insect repellent products. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2008;59(2):316-23.

Isedeh P, Osterwalder U, Lim HW. Teaspoon rule revisited: proper amount of sunscreen application. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed [Internet]. 2013;29(1):55-6.

Jansen R, Osterwalder U, Wang SQ, Burnett M, Lim HW. Photoprotection: part II. Sunscreen: development, efficacy, and controversies. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2013;69(6):867.e1-14.

Latha MS, Martis J, Shobha V, Sham Shinde R, Bangera S, Krishnankutty B, et al.. Sunscreening agents: a review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6(1):16-26.

Lionetti N, Rigano L. The New Sunscreens among Formulation Strategy, Stability Issues, Changing Norms, Safety and Efficacy Evaluations. Cosmetics. 2017;4(2):15-25.

Liu W, Wang X, Lai W, Yan T, Wu Y, Wan M, et al. Sunburn protection as a function of sunscreen application thickness differs between high and low SPFs. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed . 2012;28(3):120-6.

Manikrao Donglikar M, Laxman Deore S. Sunscreens: A review. Phcogj [Internet]. 2016;8(3):171-9.

Mancebo SE, Hu JY, Wang SQ. Sunscreens: a review of health benefits, regulations, and controversies. Dermatol Clin . 2014;32(3):427-38.

Mancuso JB, Maruthi R, Wang SQ, Lim HW. Sunscreens: An Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18(5):643-50.

Osterwalder U, Herzog B. The long way towards the ideal sunscreen-where we stand and what still needs to be done. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(4):470-81.

Ouyang H, Skillman. The delivery of sunscreen aerosol sprays. Consumption and exposure assessment to sunscreen products: A key point for safety assessment. 2014;70(5):AB157.

Ou-Yang H, Stanfield J, Cole C, Appa Y, Rigel D. High-SPF sunscreens (SPF >/= 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2012;67(6):1220-7.

Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Bertini B, Ricci M, Nocchetti M, Latterini L, et al. Anionic clays for sunscreen agent safe use: photoprotection, photostability and prevention of their skin penetration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm . 2006;62(2):185-93.

Pissavini M, Diffey B. The likelihood of sunburn in sunscreen users is disproportionate to the SPF. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed . 2013;29(3):111-5.

Portilho L, Leonardi GR. The real protection of facial sunscreens. Br J Dermatol. 2019;182(4):1050-1052.

Sarkany R. Sun protection strategies. Medicine. 2017;45(7):444-7.

Seite S, Colige A, Piquemal-Vivenot P, Montastier C, Fourtanier A, Lapiere C, et al. A full-UV spectrum absorbing daily use cream protects human skin against biological changes occurring in photoaging. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed . 2000;16(4):147-55.

Serpone N, Dondi D, Albini A. Inorganic and organic UV filters: Their role and efficacy in sunscreens and suncare products. Inorg Chim Acta. 2007;360(3):794-802.

Tanner PR. Sunscreen product formulation. Dermatol Clin . 2006;24(1):53-62.

Urbach F. The historical aspects of sunscreens. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001;64(2-3):99-104.

Wang SQ, Balagula Y, Osterwalder U. Photoprotection: a review of the current and future technologies. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23(1):31-47.

Williams JD, Maitra P, Atillasoy E, Wu MM, Farberg AS, Rigel DS. SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: Results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2018;78(5):902-10.e2.

Wolf R, Wolf D, Morganti P, Ruocco V. Sunscreens. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19(4):452-9.

Yashovardhana DP RB, Sucheta S, Raghukumar S, Aggarwal A. Knowledge, attitude and practices about sun exposure, photoprotection and sunscreen usage among college students of Hassan in Karnataka: A cross-sectional study. J Pak Assoc Dermatologists. 2018;28(1):64-8.

Young AR, Claveau J, Rossi AB. Ultraviolet radiation and the skin: Photobiology and sunscreen photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2017;76(3S1): S100-s9.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Effectiveness of sunscreens and factors influencing sun protection: a review. (2023). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e20693