In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity and eye irritation potential of preservatives widely used in cosmetics

Autores

  • Gabriela de Oliveira Prado Corrêa São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Danieli Camilo Marcato São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Wagner Soares Ramos São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Marcos Antônio Corrêa São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Vera Lucia Borges Isaac São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e20039

Palavras-chave:

Preservatives, Cosmetics, Cell culture, Cytotoxicity, HET-CAM test

Resumo

The consumption of cosmetics has been increasing every year and is expected to reach $675 billion by 2020 at an estimated growth rate of 6.4% per year. Exposure to skin irritants is the major cause of non-immunological inflammation of the skin. Therefore, the safety evaluation of cosmetic preservatives should be increased. Thus, the present work aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity as the viability endpoint and the eye irritation potential of preservatives used in cosmetics. Cytotoxicity assays were performed using MTT and NRU in human keratinocytes (HaCaT), human dermal fibroblasts, adult (HDFa), and human hepatoma cells (HepG2). The eye irritation potential was evaluated using the Hen’s Egg Test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM). The evaluated preservatives were methylparaben (MP), propylparaben (PP), phenoxyethanol (PE), and a mixture of methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone (CMI/MI). All preservatives showed cytotoxic potential within the permitted concentrations for use in cosmetic products. In the HET-CAM test, PE and CMI/MI, MP, and PP were classified as severe, moderate, and poor irritants, respectively. Our results indicate that proper safety evaluations are required to ensure the beneficial properties of preservatives on cosmetic products without exceeding exposure levels that would result in adverse health effects for consumers.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Abdian N, Ghasemi-Dehkordi P, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Ganji-Arjenaki M, Doosti A, Amiri B. Comparison of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) growth rate in culture media supplemented with or without basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Cell Tissue Banking. 2015;16(4):487-95.

Anselmi C, Ettorre A, Andreassi M, Centini M, Neri P, Di Stefano A. In vitro induction of apoptosis vs. necrosis by widely used preservatives: 2-phenoxyethanol, a mixture of isothiazolinones, imidazolidinyl urea and 1,2-pentanediol. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;63(3):437-53.

Aubert N, Ameller T, Legrand J-J. Systemic exposure to parabens: Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, excretion balance and plasma metabolites of [14C]-methyl-, propyl- and butylparaben in rats after oral, topical or subcutaneous administration. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(3):445-54.

Berthet A, Spring P, Vernez D, Plateel G, Hopf NB. Ex vivo human skin permeation of methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI). Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(11):3529-42.

Bos JD, Kapsenberg ML. The skin immune system: progress in cutaneous biology. Immunol Today. 1993;14(2):75-8.

Cazedey ECL, Carvalho FC, Fiorentino FAM, Gremião MPD, Salgado HRN. Corrositex®, BCOP and HET-CAM as alternative methods to animal experimentation. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2009;45(4):759-66.

Chiari BG, Martini PC, Moraes JDD, Andréo R, Antonio M, Cicarelli RMB, et al. Use of HepG2 cells to assay the safety of cosmetic active substances. Int J Res Cosmet Sci. 2012;2(2):8-14.

Chiari BG, Trovatti E, Pecoraro É, Corrêa MA, Cicarelli RMB, Ribeiro SJL, Isaac VLB. Synergistic effect of green coffee oil and synthetic sunscreen for health care application. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;52:389-93.

CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol. 2008;27 Suppl 4:1-82.

Darbre PD, Aljarrah A, Miller WR, Coldham NG, Sauer MJ, Pope GS. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol. 2004;24(1):5-13.

Darbre PD, Harvey PW. Paraben esters: review of recent studies of endocrine toxicity, absorption, esterase and human exposure, and discussion of potential human health risks. J Appl Toxicol . 2008;28(5):561-78.

Darbre PD, Harvey PW. Parabens can enable hallmarks and characteristics of cancer in human breast epithelial cells: a review of the literature with reference to new exposure data and regulatory status: Parabens and breast cancer. J Appl Toxicol . 2014;34(9):925-38.

Dauer A, Hensel A, Lhoste E, Knasmüller S, Mersch- Sundermann V. Genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of catechin and tannins from the bark of Hamamelis virginiana L. in metabolically competent, human hepatoma cells (Hep G2) using single cell gel electrophoresis. Phytochemistry. 2003;63(2):199-207.

DEPA (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency). Survey and health and environmental assessment of preservatives in cosmetic products [Internet]. 2015 [citad 2019 Nov 12]. Available from: Available from: https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2015/05/978-87-93352-19-3.pdf

» https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2015/05/978-87-93352-19-3.pdf

Derouiche MTT, Abdennour S. HET-CAM test. Application to shampoos in developing countries. Toxicol In Vitro. 2017;45(Part 3):393-6.

European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. 16 Dec 2009.

European Union. Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products. 30 Nov 2009.

European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1003/2014 of 18 September 2014 amending Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products. 18 Sept 2014.

European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198 of 22 July 2016 amending Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products. 22 Jul 2016.

Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito DV, Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, et al. Parabens. Dermatitis. 2019;30(1):3-31.

Garcia-Hidalgo E, Schneider D, von Goetz N, Delmaar C, Siegrist M, Hungerbühler K. Aggregate consumer exposure to isothiazolinones via household care and personal care products: Probabilistic modelling and benzisothiazolinone risk assessment. Environ Int. 2018;118:245-56.

González-Muñoz P, Conde-Salazar L, Vañó-Galván S. Dermatitis alérgica de contacto a cosméticos. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(9):822-32.

Groot de AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD, van der Meeren HL, van Joost T, Jagtman BA, Weyland JW. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(10):1525-9.

Gueniche A, Ponec M. Use of human skin cell cultures for the estimation of potential skin irritants. Toxicol In Vitro . 1993;7(1):15-24.

Halla N, Fernandes IP, Heleno SA, Costa P, Boucherit- Otmani Z, Boucherit K, et al. Cosmetics Preservation: A Review on Present Strategies. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1571.

Hartung T. Toxicology for the twenty-first century. Nature. 2009;460(7252):208-12.

Hewitt NJ, Hewitt P. Phase I and II enzyme characterization of two sources of HepG2 cell lines. Xenobiotica. 2004;34(3):243-56.

Herman A. Antimicrobial Ingredients as Preservative Booster and Components of Self-Preserving Cosmetic Products. Curr Microbiol. 2019;76(6):744-54.

ICCVAM (Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods). ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Report: Current Validation Status of In Vitro Test Methods Proposed for Identifying Eye Injury Hazard Potential of Chemicals and Products. NIH Publication No. 10-7553. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 2010.

ISO (International standard). Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5). 2009.

Jennings P. The future of in vitro toxicology. Toxicol In Vitro . 2015;29(6):1217-21.

Kim W-S, Park B-S, Sung J-H, Yang J-M, Park S-B, Kwak S-J, et al. Wound healing effect of adipose-derived stem cells: A critical role of secretory factors on human dermal fibroblasts. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;48(1):15-24.

Kodani SD, Overby HB, Morisseau C, Chen J, Zhao L, Hammock BD. Parabens inhibit fatty acid amide hydrolase: A potential role in paraben-enhanced 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Toxicol Lett. 2016;262:92-9.

Lilienblum W. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) - Final version of the opinion on Phenoxyethanol in cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;82:156.

Luepke NP. Hen’s egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem Toxicol . 1985;23(2):287-91.

Lundov MD, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy and dose-response relationships. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(6):330-6.

McKenzie B, Kay G, Matthews KH, Knott RM, Cairns D. The hen’s egg chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) test to predict the ophthalmic irritation potential of a cysteamine- containing gel: Quantification using Photoshop® and ImageJ. Int J Pharm. 2015;490(1):1-8.

Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1):55-63.

Natarajan AT, Darroudi F. Use of human hepatoma cells for in vitro metabolic activation of chemical mutagens/ carcinogens. Mutagenesis. 1991;6(5):399-403.

Oliveira AGL de, Silva RS, Alves EN, Presgrave R de F, Presgrave OAF, Delgado IF. Ensaios da membrana cório- alantoide (HET-CAM e CAM-TBS): alternativas para a avaliação toxicológica de produtos com baixo potencial de irritação ocular. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz. 2012;71(1):153-9.

Oishi S. Effects of propyl paraben on the male reproductive system. Food Chem Toxicol . 2002;40(12):1807-13.

Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(7):1125-31.

Sassa S, Sugita O, Galbraith RA, Kappas A. Drug metabolism by the human hepatoma cell, Hep G2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987;143(1):52-7.

SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on the mixture of 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazolin-3(2H)-one and 2-methylisothiazolin-3(2H)-one, 8 Dec 2009.

SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on parabens, 3 May 2013.

SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on Phenoxyethanol, 16 March 2016, final version of 6 oct 2016, SCCS/1575/16.

Shabir GA, Bradshaw TK, Shar GQ, Arain SA. Development and Validation of a RPLC Method for the Determination of 2-Phenoxyethanol in Senselle Lubricant Formulation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010;72(3):312-7.

Tahan GP, Santos N de KS, Albuquerque AC, Martins I. Determination of parabens in serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Correlation with lipstick use. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol . 2016;79:42-8.

Taofiq O, Rodrigues F, Barros L, Barreiro MF, Ferreira ICFR, Oliveira MBPP. Mushroom ethanolic extracts as cosmeceuticals ingredients: Safety and ex vivo skin permeation studies. Food Chem Toxicol . 2019;127:228-36.

Towle KM, Drechsel DA, Warshaw EM, Fung ES, Novick RM, Paustenbach DJ, et al. Risk assessment of the skin sensitization induction potential of kathon CG in rinse-off and leave-on personal care and cosmetic products. Dermatitis. 2018;29(3):132-8.

Triglia D, Sherard Braa S, Yonan C, Naughton GK. Cytotoxicity testing using neutral red and MTT assays on a three-dimensional human skin substrate. Toxicol In Vitro . 1991;5(5-6):573-8.

van de Sandt J, Roguet R, Cohen C, Esdaile D, Ponec M, Corsini E, et al. The use of human keratinocytes and human skin models for predicting skin irritation. Altern Lab Anim. 1999;27(5):723-43.

Yu SH, Sood A, Taylor JS. Patch Testing for Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone- Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(1):67-72.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-07-10

Edição

Seção

Original Article

Como Citar

In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity and eye irritation potential of preservatives widely used in cosmetics. (2023). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e20039