Risk factors for the prognosis of pediatric medulloblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 40 cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(05)07Keywords:
Child, Clinical Factors, Medulloblastoma, Molecular Phenotype, Overall Survival Time, PrognosisAbstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the association of molecular subtypes, clinical characteristics and pathological types with the prognosis of patients with medulloblastoma. METHODS: We analyzed forty patients with medulloblastoma who underwent surgical resection at our center between January 2004 and June 2014. Risk factors associated with survival, disease progression and recurrence were analyzed with a univariate Cox regression analysis, and the identified significant risk factors were further analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: Factors associated with overall survival included M stage (p=0.014), calcification (p=0.012), postoperative treatment, postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (p=0.015), and molecular subtype (p=0.005 for WNT and p=0.008 for SHH). Number of symptoms (p=0.029), M stage (p<0.001), and postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.033) were associated with disease progression. Patients with the WNT or SHH subtype had better survival outcomes than patients with non-WNT/SHH subtypes. Risk factors for disease progression-free survival were symptoms >;2 and ≥M1 stage without postoperative radiotherapy. The risk of recurrence increased with advanced M stage. Protective factors for recurrence included M0 stage and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: We identified the risk factors associated with survival, disease progression and recurrence of medulloblastoma patients. This information is helpful for understanding the prognostic factors related to medulloblastoma.Downloads
Downloads
Published
2017-05-01
Issue
Section
Clinical Sciences
How to Cite
Yu, J., Zhao, R., Shi, W., & Li, H. (2017). Risk factors for the prognosis of pediatric medulloblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 40 cases. Clinics, 72(5), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(05)07