CHILD DEVELOPMENT: COMPARISON BETWEEN CHILDREN WHO ATTEND OR DO NOT ATTEND PUBLIC DAYCARE CENTRES

Autores

  • Lívia Lúcio de Mattos Amaro Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Sávia Alves Pinto Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Rosane Luzia de Souza Morais Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Jacqueline Alves Tolentino Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Larissa Rosa Felício Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Ana Cristina Resende Camargos Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil
  • Fernanda Oliveira Ferreira Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) - Campus Governador Valadares - Centro – Governador Valadares (MG), Brasil
  • Camila Avelar Gonçalves Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) - Diamantina (MG), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.103002

Palavras-chave:

child development, child daycare centres, environmental quality, childcare.

Resumo

Objective: To avaluate and compare the development of children attending public nursery school from their peers who remain only in the home environment. Methods: We performed an observational, cross-sectional study with 167 children aged between 11 and 57 months from Alto Vale do Jequitinhonha, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The subjects were divided into two groups (nursery and hom areas:e), homogeneous in age, gender, socioeconomic status, and maternal education. The development areas: personal-social, language, and fine and gross motor were evaluated through the Denver II test and the quality of environment of the five public nursery school ‘ through the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition (ITERS-R). We used the chi-square statistical test for comparison between groups. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between groups for the overall test result for Denver II, nor for the different areas of the test. The environments presented daycare quality between ‘inadequate’ and ‘minimal’. Thus, there was no difference between attending a low quality daycare or just staying in the home for child development. Conclusion: No difference was observed when comparing the development areas: personal-social, language, and gross and fine motor of child who attend public nursery school and their peers who remained only in the home environment. The daycare environments analysed showed quality considered ‘inadequate’, which may have influenced the results as the literature has pointed out the need for a quality childcare environment to positively influence child development.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Bronferbrenner U. Bioecologia do desenvolvimento humano: tornando os seres humanos mais humanos. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.

Grantham-Mcgregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007; 369 (9555): 60-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/

1016/S0140-6736(07)60032-4

Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002; 53: 371-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233

Fundo das Nações Unidas para a Infância (UNICEF). Situação mundial da infância 2008: sobrevivência infantil. [cited 2010 Sep 08] Available from: http://www.unicef.org/brazil/pt/cadernobrasil2008.pdf.

Lordelo ER, Chalhub AA, Guirra RC, Carvalho CS. Contexto e desenvolvimento cognitivo: freqüência à creche e evolução do desenvol(2): 324-334. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722007000200019

Pacheco ALPB, Dupret L. Creche: desenvolvimento ou sobrevivência? Psicol USP. 2004; 15(3): 103-116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65642004000200006

Brasil. Presidência da República. Lei nº 10.172, de 09 de janeiro de 2001. Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação e dá outras providências. [cited 2015 Jun 18] Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/leis_2001/l10172.htm

Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (PNDU). Os objetivos de desenvolvimento do milênio. [cited 2014 Oct. 20] Available from: http://www.pnud.org.br/ODM.aspx.

Vieira LMF. A educação infantil e o plano nacional de educação: as propostas da CONAE 2010. Educ Soc Campinas: 2010; 31(112): 809-831. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302010000300009

Bradley RH, Vandell DL. Child care and the well-being of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007; 161(7):669-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.7.669

Engle PL, Black MM. The effect of poverty on child development and educational outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1136(1): 243-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1425.023

Reynolds AJ, Temple JA, Ou SR, Robertson DL, Mersky JP, Topitzes JW, et al. Effects of a school-based, early childhood intervention on adult health and well-being: a 19-year followup of low-income families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc

Med. 2007; 161(8): 730-9. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.8.730

Rezende MA, Beteli VC, Santos JLF. Avaliação de habilidades de linguagem e pessoal-sociais pelo Teste de Denver II em instituições de educação infantil. Acta Paul Enferm. 2005; (1): 56-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/

S0103-21002005000100008

Santos DCC, Tolocka RE, Carvalho J, Heringer LRC, Almeida CM, Miquelote AF. Desempenho motor grosso e sua associação com fatores neonatais, familiares e de exposição à creche em crianças até três anos de idade.

Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009; 13(2): 173-179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005 000025

Barros RP, Carvalho M, Franco S, Mendonça RSP, Rosalém A. Uma avaliação do impacto da qualidade da creche no desenvolvimento infantil. Pesq Planej Econômico. 2011; 41(2):213-232.

Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics. 1992; 89(1): 91-7.

Harms T, Cryer D, Clifford R. Infant/toddler environment rating Scale, revised edition (ITERSR). Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill: Teachers College Press; 2006.

Souza TN, Campos-de-Carvalho M. Qualidade de ambientes de creches: uma escala de avaliação. Psicol Estudo. Maringá: 2005; 10(1): 87-96.

Lima ABR, Bhering E. Um estudo sobre creches como ambiente de desenvolvimento. Cad Pesq. 2006; 36 (129): 573-596.

Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério de classificação econômica Brasil. [Cited 2011 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/novo/ Content.aspx?ContentID=301.

JekeL JF, Katz DL, Elmore JG. Epidemiology, biostatistics, and preventive medicine. 2.ed. Atlanta: Elsevier; 2001.

Biscegli TS, Polis LB, Santos LM, Vicentin M. Avaliação do estado nutricional e do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor em crianças frequentadoras de creche. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2007; 25(4): 337-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822007000400007

Souza SC, Leone C, Takano OA, Moratelli HB. Desenvolvimento de pré-escolares na educação infantil em Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2008; 24(8):1917-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-

X2008000800020

Petterson SM, Albers AB. Effects of poverty and maternal depression on early child development. Child Dev. 2001; 72(6): 1794-1813. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00379

Carvalho AM, Pereira AS. Qualidade em ambientes de um programa de educação infantil pública. Psicol Teor Pesq. 2008; 24(3): 269-277. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722008000300002

Howes C. Can the age of entry and the quality of infant child care predict adjustments in kindergartens? Dev Psychol. 1990; 26(2): 252-303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/0.1037/0012-1649.26.2.292

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. Child care and family predictors of preschool attachment and stability from infancy. Dev Psychol. 2001; 37(6): 847-862. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.6.847

Zeppone SC, Volpon LC Del Ciampo LA. Monitoramento do desenvolvimento infantil realizado no Brasil. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2012; 30(4): 594-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822012000400019

Downloads

Publicado

2015-10-20

Edição

v. 25 n. 2 (2015)

Seção

Pesquisa Original

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis