Relation between motor perfomance and physical fi tness level of schoolchildren
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.119261Palabras clave:
motor skills, motor skills disorders, physical fi tness, children.Resumen
Introduction: Children with poor motor performance, engage in less vigorous and organized activities, contributing to low scores in physical fi tness assessments. However, there is no consensus in the literature about the association between variables. Objective: Evaluate the relationship between motor performance and physical fi tness of students between 7 and 10 years old. Methods: Ninety-eight (98) students enrolled in a public school in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, participated in this study. For motor evaluation, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2) was used; the assessment of physical fi tness was performed using the guidelines of the Brazil Sport Project (PROESP-BR). Data were tabulated in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for the descriptive statistical analysis (mean, standard deviation, frequency) and inferential analysis (Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple linear regression test). The signifi cance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The values of the prevalence of motor diffi culty and motor diffi culty risk were 5.9% and 13.9%, respectively, and the value for without diffi culty of movement was 80.2%. Differences were found for males in the agility tests and explosive strength of the lower limbs (p < 0.05), in which the boys with motor diffi culty showed lower values. We noticed that abdominal strength, endurance, and agility significantly contributed to explain the variability in motor performance, which together showed a coeffi cient of determination (R²) of 0.13. Conclusion: Abdominal strength/endurance and agility contributed signifi cantly in explaining the variability in motor performance. Thus, it is fundamental to encourage involvement in activities that contribute to the increase in motor repertoire refl ecting physical fi tness.
Referencias
Santos S, Dantas L, Oliveira JA. Desenvolvimento motor de crianças, de idosos e de pessoas com transtornos da coordenação. Rev Paul Educ Fís. 2004;18(especial):33-44.
Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway DJ. Compreendendo o desenvolvimento motor: bebês, crianças, adolescentes e adultos. 7 ed. São Paulo: Artmed; 2013; p. 21-41.
Batey CA, Missiuna CA, Timmons BW, Hay JA, Faught BE, Cairney J. Self-effi cacy toward physical activity and the physical activity behavior of children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;36:258-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.10.003
Böhme MTS. Relação entre aptidão física, esporte e treinamento esportivo. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov. 2003;11(3):97-104.
Lifshitz N, Raz-Silbiger S, Weintraub N, Steinhart S, Cermak SA, Katz N. Physical fi tness and overweight in Israeli children with and without developmental coordination disorder: gender differences. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2773-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.020
Joshi D, Missiuna C, Hanna S, Hay J, Faught BE, Cairney J. Relationship between BMI, waist circumference, physical activity and probable developmental coordination disorder over time. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;40:237-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.011
Krebs RJ, Duarte MG, Nobre GC, Nazario PF, Santos JOL. Relação entre escores de desempenho motor e aptidão física em crianças com idades entre 07 e 08. Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(2):94-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n2p94
Santos MMA, Ribeiro SML, Pellegrini AM, Rocha PRH, Hiraga CY. Crianças com difi culdades motoras apresentam baixos níveis de aptidão física? Motriz: Rev Educ Fis. 2012;18(4):748-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-65742012000400013
Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2. Londres: Pearson Assessment; 2007; p. 41-183.
Gaya A, Lemos A, Gaya A, Teixeira D, Pinheiro E, Moreira R. Projeto Esporte Brasil: PROESP-Br: manual de testes e avaliação: versão 2012. Porto Alegre: UFRGS /CNPq / Ministério do Esporte; 2012.
Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS). Classificação do estado nutricional para adolescentes de 10 a 19 anos, 2007. [cited 2014 May 30] Available from: http://nutricao.saude.gov.br/
Silva J, Beltrame TS. Desempenho motor e difi culdades de aprendizagem em escolares com idades entre 7 e 10 anos. Motricidade. 2011;7(2):53-64.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.7(2).111
Souza C, Ferreira L, Catuzzo MT, Corrêa UC. O teste ABC do movimento em crianças de ambientes diferentes. Rev Port. Cienc.Desp. 2007;7(1):36-47.
Green D, Lingam R, Mattocks C, Riddoch C, Ness A, Emond A. The risk of reduced physical activity in children with probable Developmental Coordination Disorder: a prospective longitudinal study. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(4):1332-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.040
Junaid K, Harris SR, Fulmer KA, Carswell A. Teachers’ Use of the MABC Checklist to Identify Children with Motor Coordination Diffi culties. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2000;12(4):158-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001577-200001240-00003
Psotta R, Hendl J, Fromel K, Lehnert M. The second version of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A comparative study in 7-10 year old children from the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2012;42(4):19-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/ag.2012.020
Butterfi eld SA, Angell RM, Mason CA. Age and sex differences in object control skills by children ages 5 to 14. Percept Mot Skills. 2012;114(1):261-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/10.11.25.PMS.114.1.261-274
Guedes DP, Neto JTM, Silva AJ. Desempenho motor em uma amostra de escolares brasileiros. Motricidade. 2011;7(2):25(14):25-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.7(2).108
Silva JD, Capistrano R, Beltrame TS, Alexandre JM. Desempenho motor e senso de autoefi cácia de escolares do ensino fundamental. Psicol. Teor. 2014;16(2):122-130. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15348/1980-
/psicologia.v16n2p122-130
Valentini NC, Coutinho MTC, Pansera SM, Santos VAP, Vieira JLL, Ramalho MH, et al. Prevalence of motor defi cits and developmental coordination disorders in children from South Brazil. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2012;30(3):377-84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822012000300011
Coutinho MTC, Spessato BC, Valentini NC. Transtorno do desenvolvimento da coordenação: prevalência e dificuldades motoras de escolares da cidade de Porto Alegre. Congresso Brasileiro de Ciências do Esporte. Anais. [cited 2014 May 30] Available from: <http://cbce.tempsite.ws/congressos/index.php/XVII_CONBRACE/2011/schedConf/presentations>.
De Miguel-Etayo P, Gracia-Marco L, Ortega FB, Intemann T, Foraita R, Lissner L, et al. Physical fi tness reference standards in European children: the IDEFICS study. Int J Obesity. 2014;38(Suppl 2):57-66. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.136
Luguetti CN, Ré AHN, Böhme MTS. Indicadores de aptidão física de escolares da região centro-oeste da cidade de São Paulo. Rev Bras Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum. 2010;12(5):331-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2010v12N5P331
Hiraga CY, Rocha PRH, Ferracioli MDC, Gama DT, Pellegrini AM. Physical fi tness in children with probable developmental coordination disorder and normal body mass index. Rev Bras Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum. 2014;16(2):182-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2014v16n2p182
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis