Characteristics of the clinical development of a newborn with gastroschisis in an intensive care unit in latin america
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.119266Palavras-chave:
gastroschisis, new-born, mortality, total parenteral nutrition, renal insuffi ciency, infection.Resumo
Introduction: Congenital malformations are major diseases observed at birth. They are the second most common cause of death in the neonatal population, the fi rst one being prematurity. Objective: To characterise the clinical outcome of newborns with gastroschisis (GS) in a neonatal intensive care unit. Methods: A retrospective observational clinical study in 50 infants with GS using the association of intestinal abnormalities, impossibility of primary closure of the abdominal defect and reoperation necessity as classifi cation criteria for the disease. The signifi cance level was p < 0.05. Results: The hospitalisation to primary surgery occurred with a median age of 2 hours. Fourteen percent of children were subjected to a primary silo interposition and 24% had associated intestinal malformation. Nineteen newborns (NB) required more than one surgery. The median length of stay was 33 days, higher in patients with complex GS (56 days). All NB recovered from urine output 48 hours after surgery and 40% had hyponatraemia and oligoanuria in this period. There was no difference between the natraemia and fasting time (p = 0.79). Weight gain was similar in both groups with total parenteral nutrition and became signifi cantly higher in patients with simple GS after enteral feeding (p = 0.0046). These NB evolved 2.4 times less cholestasis. Late-onset sepsis occurred in 58% of patients and was related to the infection of the central venous catheter in 37.9% of cases. Mortality was higher in infants infected with complex GS and the overall mortality rate was 14%. Conclusion: Clinical characterisation of newborns with gastroschisis depends on the complexity and the knowledge and conduct of morbidities to reduce mortality.
Referências
Sekhobo JP, Druschel CM. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: An application for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(4):296-305.
Amorim MMR, Vilela PC, Santos ARVD, Lima ALMV, Melo EFP, Bernardes HF et al. Impacto das malformações congênitas na mortalidade perinatal e neonatal em uma maternidade-escola do Recife. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2006;6(Supl 1):S19-S25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292006000500003
Castilha EE, Mastroiacovo P, Orioli IM. Gastroschisi: international epidemiology and public health perspectives. Am J Med Genet. 2008;148C(3):162-79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30181
Kirby RS, Marshall J, Tanner JP, Salemi JL, Feldkamp ML, Marengo L, et al. Prevalence and correlates of gastroschisis in 15 states, 1995 a 2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):275-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829cbbb4
Ledbetter DJ. Gastroschisis and omphalocele. Surg Clin N Am. 2006;86(2):249-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2005.12.003
Feldkamp ML, Botto LD. Developing a research and public health agenda for gastroschisis: How do we brige the gap between what is know and what is not? Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148C(3):155-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30183
Curry JL, McKinney P, Thornton JG, Stringer MD. The aetiology of gastrosquisis. BJOG. 2000; 107(11):1339-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11645.x
Nichol PF, Byrne JLB, Dodgion C, Saijoh Y. Clinical consideration in gastroschisis. Incremental advances against a congential anomaly with severe secondary effectas. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148C(3):231-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30180
Rasmussen SA, Frias JL. Non genetic risk factors for gastroschisis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008;148C(3):199-212. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30175
Byrne JLB, Feldkamp ML. Seven-week embryo with gastroschisis, multiple anomalies and physiologic hernia suggest early onset of gastroschisis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(4):236-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20446
Paidas MJ, Crombleholme TM, Robertson FM. Prenatal diagnosis and management of the fetus with an abdominal wall defect. Semin Perinatol 1994;18(3):196-214.
Burge DM, Ade-Ajayi N. Adverse outcome after prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis: the role of fetal monitoring. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(3):441-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90601-1
Sydorak RM, Nijagal A, Sbragia L, Hirose S, Tsao K, Phibbs RH, et al. Gastroschisis: small hole, big cost. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(12):1669-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.36689
Alshehri A, Emil S, Laberge JM, Skarsgard E; The Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network. Outcomes of early versus late intestinal operations in patients with gastroschisis and intestinal atresia: results from a prospective national database. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(10):2022-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.003
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Int Care Med. 2013;41(2):580-637. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af
Schmidt AFS, Gonçalves A, Bustorff-Silva JM, Oliveira-Filho AG, Miranda ML, Oliveira ER, et al. Monitoring intravesical pressure during gastroschisis closure. Does it help to decide between delayed primary or staged closure? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1438-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.640366
Schmidt AF, Gonçalves A, Bustorff-Silva JM, Oliveira Filho AG, Marba ST, Sbragia L. Does staged closure have a worse prognosis in gastroschisis? Clinics. 2011;66(4):563-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400007
Santos MM, Tannuri U, Maksoud JG. Alterations of enteric nerve plexus in experimental gastroschisis: is there a delay in the maturation? J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(10):1506-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00504-9
Tannuri ACA, Sbragia L, Tannuri U, Silva LM, Leal AJG, Schmidt AFS, et al. Evolution of critically ill patients with gastroschisis from three tertiary centers. Clinics. 2011;66(1):17-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-5932201100010000
Tannuri ACA, Silva LM, Leal AJG, Ricardi LRS, Tannuri. Qual é a melhor solução de hidratação parenteral a ser utilizada no tratamento pós-operatório de recém-nascidos com gastrosquise? Experiência do Instituto da Criança do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP. Pediatr. 2010;32(2):84-9.
Feferbaum R, Leone C, Cruciani J, Alves P, Tomaz B, Maluvayshi C, et al. PP252-MON: lipid emulsion with fi sh oil improves associated parenteral nutrition cholestasis in neonates with gastrointestinal exclusion. Clin Nutrition. 2014;33(Suppl 1):S223. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5614(14)50586-9
Shaw K, Buchmiller TL, Curr M, Lam MM, Habib R, Chopourian HL, et al. Impairment of nutrient uptake in a rabbit model of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(3):376-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90570-3
Srinathan SK, Langer JC, Wang JL, Rubin DC. Enterocytic gene expression is altered in experimental gastroschisis. J Surg Res. 1997;68(1):1-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1996.4986
Camacho-Gonzalez A, Spearman PW, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(2):367-89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.003
Viemann D, Dubbel G, Schleifenbaum S, Harms E, Sorg C, Roth J. Expression of toll-like receptors in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(4):654-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/01.PDR.0000180544.02537.FD
Kollmann TR, Crabtree J, Rein-Weston A, Blimkie D, Thommai F, Wang XY, et al. Neonatal innate TLRmediated responses are distinct from those of adults. J Immunol. 2009;183(11):7150-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/ jimmunol.0901481
Russell ARB. Neonatal sepsis. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;21(6):265-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2010.11.003
Baird R, Puligandla P, Skarsgard E, Laberge JM; Canadian Pediatric surgical Network. Infectious complications in the management of gastroschisis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(4):399-404. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3038-6
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis