Zika virus and measures of legal interventions in public health

Autores

  • José Luiz Gondim dos Santos Programa de Mestrando em Ciências da Saúde da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC) – Santo André (SP)
  • Marcos Vinicius Malveira de Lima
  • Francisco Naildo Cardoso Leitão
  • Vitor Djannaro Eliamen da Costa
  • Hugo Macedo Jr
  • Pascoal Torres Muniz Pesquisador. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva da Universidade Federal do Acre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.122919

Palavras-chave:

zika virus, legal interventions, public heath.

Resumo

The zika virus is an emerging and important world health problem. In public health its harmful effects have stimulated various legal interests. The Federal Government of Brazil recently adopted several social and health surveillance measures, extending the instruments of possibilities to combating the virus transmitter in Brazil. Law No. 13.306/2016 brought incisive determinations about action awareness policies and educational campaigns, and at the same time authorizes the highest authorities of the Unified Health System (SUS) within federal, state, county and municipal governments to establish and implement the necessary measures to control the diseases caused by the virus, i.e. dengue, chikungunya and zika. The published legislation has created a motivating environment for researchers to develop projects aimed at the mosquito that transmits the dengue virus, the chikungunya virus and the zika virus. Therefore, studies on A. aegypti have led to greater scientifi c knowledge about its habitat, reproduction and development and a description of means to combat it, as a precondition for the ful filment of the social purposes of Law No. 13.301, of June 27, 2016, mainly if researches about more efficient management models and management of public finances, contributing to unveiling impacts on public health and growth and human development.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). World Health Organization (WHO). (PAHO/WHO). Zika virus infection: step by step guide on Risk Communications and Community Engagement. [cited 2016 Jan 27] Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=33051&Itemid=270

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Zika virus. [cited 2016 Aug 18] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/intheus/fl orida-update.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recognizing, Managing, and Reporting Zika Virus Infections in Travelers Returning from Central America, South America, the Caribbean, and Mexico. [cited 2015 Jan 15] Available from: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/han00385.asp

Johansson MA, Mier-y-Teran-Romero L, Reefhuis J, Gilboa SM, Hills SL. Zika and the Risk of Microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1605367

Gatherer D, Kohl A. Zika virus: a previously slow pandemic spreads rapidly through the Americas. J Gen Virol. 2016; 97(2):269-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.000381

Duffy MR, Tai-Ho C, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, federated states of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2536-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0805715

Cao-Lormeau VM, Roche C, Teissier A, Robin E, Berry AL, Mallet HP, et al. Zika virus, French Polynesia, South Pacifi c, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20(6):1085-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2006.140138

Ioos S, Mallet HP, Leparc Goffart I, Gauthier V, Cardoso T, Herida M. Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Med Mal Infect. 2014; 44(7):302-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.medmal.2014.04.008

Zanluca C, Melo VCA, Mosimann ALP, Santos GIV, Santos CND, Luz K. First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(4):569-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760150192

Salvador FS, Fujita DM. Entry routes for Zika virus in Brazil after 2014 world cup: New possibilities. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14(1):49-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.10.004

Musso D. Zika virus transmission from French Polynesia to Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1887. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2110.151125

Brasil P, Calvet GA, Siqueira AM, Wakimoto M, Sequeira PC, Nobre A, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Clinical Characterization, Epidemiological and Virological Aspects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(4): e0004636. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004636

Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). World Health Organization (WHO). Zika cases and congenital syndrome associated with Zika virus reported by countries and territories in the Americas, 2015 -2016: Cumulative cases. [cited 2016 Sep 29] Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&option=com_docman&task=doc_view&Itemid=270&gid=36250&lang=en.

Dyer, Owen. Zika virus spreads across Americas as concerns mount over birth defects. BMJ. 2015;351:h6983. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6983

Schram PCF. Zika virus and public health. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26(1):7-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.114415

Brasil. Presidência da República. Lei nº 13.301, de 27 de junho de 2016. Dispõe sobre a adoção de medidas de vigilância em saúde quando verifi cada situação de iminente perigo à saúde pública pela presença do mosquito transmissor do vírus da dengue, do vírus chikungunya e do vírus da zika; e altera a Lei nº 6.437, de 20 de agosto de 1977. [cited 2016 Sep 29]. Available from: http://presrepublica.jusbrasil.com.br/legislacao/354790519/lei-13301-16.

Brasil. Presidência da República. Lei nº 8.742, de 7 de dezembro de 1993. Dispõe sobre a organização da Assistência Social e dá outras providências. [cited 2016 Sep 29] Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8742.htm.

Brasil. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988. [cited 2016 Sep 29] Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm.

Uol Notícias Ciência e Saúde. Zika e Microcefalia: número de casos confi rmados de microcefalia no Brasil sobe para 583. [cited 2016 Sep 29] Available from: http://noticias.uol.com.br/saude/ultimas-noticias/redacao/2016/02/23/numero-de-casos-confi rmados-de-microcefalia-no-brasil-sobe-para-583.htm.

Alenxandrino M, Prado V. Direito administrativo descomplicado. 17 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forence; 2009. p. 240-51.

Brasil. Presidência da República. Lei no 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001. Regulamenta os arts. 182 e 183 da Constituição Federal, estabelece diretrizes gerais da política urbana e dá outras providências. [cited 2016 Sep 29] Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/LEIS_2001/L10257.htm.

Guimarães R. Incorporação tecnológica no SUS: o problema e seus desafi os. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2014;19(12):4899-4908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141912.04642014.

Bezerra IMP, Sorpreso ICE. Concepts and movements in health promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev. 26(1):11-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113

Downloads

Publicado

2016-11-28

Edição

v. 26 n. 3 (2016)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis