Violência por parceiro íntimo e morbidade maternal grave entre gestantes e puérperas em São Paulo, Brasil

Autores

  • Maria Inês Rosselli Puccia Curso de Enfermagem, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC) – Santo André (SP), / Programa Interunidades de Doutoramento em Enfermagem Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - São Paulo (SP)
  • Marli Villela Mamede Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto. Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - Ribeirão Preto (SP)
  • Luiz de Souza Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - Ribeirão Preto (SP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.147218

Palavras-chave:

violência por parceiro íntimo, mulheres maltratadas, morbidade materna grave, complicações na gravidez, saúde materna.

Resumo

Este artigo investigou a associação entre violência por parceiro íntimo (IPV) durante a gravidez atual e morbidade materna grave entre gestantes e puérperas atendidas em maternidades públicas na Grande São Paulo, Brasil. Um total de 109 mulheres que desenvolveram Morbidade materna grave foi selecionado de acordo com os critérios adotados pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Outras 337 mulheres que não apresentaram nenhuma intercorrência clínica, laboratorial ou de manejo durante a gestação atual e puerpério, foram selecionadas para o grupo controle. As participantes foram submetidas à investigação retrospectiva de IPV utilizando-se um instrumento adaptado do WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women, aplicado entre Novembro 2010 e Junho 2011. A relação entre a variável resposta (Morbidade materna grave) e a variável exposição (IPV) ajustadas para as demais variáveis independentes, foram avaliadas através de proporções, teste chi-quadrado, teste exato de Fischer e regressão logística múltipla. A prevalência de 12.6% (IC:9,5–15,7) para violência psicológica, 7.6% (IC:5,1–10,1) para violência física e 1.6% (IC:0,4–2,8) para violência sexual foi observada durante a gravidez atual em ambos os grupos de casos e controles. Embora não tenha sido identificada significância estatística entre exposição a IPV durante a gravidez atual e ocorrência de Morbidade materna grave (p>0,264), foram verificados fatores associados com condições sociodemográficas e reprodutivas desfavoráveis entre as mulheres expostas a IPV e entre aquelas que desenvolveram Morbidade materna grave.  O monitoramento sistemático da Morbidade materna grave e o rastreamento rotineiro para IPV entre gestantes são importantes medidas para reduzir a morbimortalidade materna e para qualificar os serviços de atenção à saúde reprodutiva.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Ellsberg MC. Candies in hell. Research and action on domestic violence against women in Nicaragua. Sweden: Umea University, 2000.

Talley P, Heitkemper M, Chicz-Demet A, Sandman CA. Male violence; stress; and neuroendocrine parameters in pregnancy: a pilot study. Biol Res Nurs. 2006;7(3):222-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1099800405283182

Miller E, Decker MR, Reed E, Raj A, Hathaway JE, Silverman JG. Male partner pregnancy-promoting behaviors and adolescent partner violence: findings from a qualitative study with adolescent females. Ambul Pediatr. 2007; 7(5):360-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.007

Bailey BA, Daugherty RA. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: incidence and associated health behaviors in a rural population. Mater Child Health J. 2007;11(5):495-503. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0191-6

Silverman JG, Gupta J, Decker MR, Kapur N, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and unwanted pregnancy; miscarriage; induced abortion; and stillbirth among a national sample of Bangladeshi women. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1246-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01481.x

Small MJ, Gupta J, Frederic R, Joseph G, Theodore M, Kershaw T. Intimate partner and nonpartner violence against pregnant women in rural Haiti. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102(3):226-31. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.008

Sharps PW, Campbell J, Baty ML, Walker KS, Bair-Merritt MH. Current evidence on perinatal home visiting and intimate partner violence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(4):480-91. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00267.x

Wang T, Liu Y, Li Z, Liu K, Xu Y, Shi W, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0175108. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175108

Sharps PW, Laughon K, Giangrande SK. Intimate partner violence and the childbearing year: maternal and infant health consequences. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2007;8(2):105-16. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524838007302594

Silverman JG, Decker MR, Reed E, Raj A. Intimate partner violence victimization prior to and during pregnancy among women residing in 26 U.S. states: Association with maternal and neonatal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(1):140-8. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.052

Sanchez SE, Qiu C, Perales MT, Lam N, Garcia P, Williams MA. Intimate partner violence (IPV) and preeclampsia among Peruvian women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137(1):50-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.013

Leone JM, Lane SD, Koumans EH, DeMott K, Wojtowycz MA, Jensen J, et al. Effects of intimate partner violence on pregnancy trauma and placental abruption. J Womens Health. 2010;19(8):1501-9. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1716

Audi CA, Segall-Corrêa AM, Santiago SM, Andrade MG, Pèrez-Escamila R. Violence against pregnant women: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Saude Pública. 2008;42(5):877-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102008005000041

Kim H, Cain R, Viner-Brown S. Intimate partner violence before or during pregnancy in Rhode Island. Med Health R I. 2010;93(1):29-31.

Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Mills TE, Gamble SL. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and intimate partner violence in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):581.e1-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.018

Johri M, Morales RE, Boivin JF, Samayoa BE, Hoch JS, Grazioso CF, et al. Increased risk of miscarriage among women experiencing physical or sexual intimate partner violence during pregnancy in Guatemala City, Guatemala: cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2011;11:49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-49

Chu SY, Goodwin MM, D'Angelo DV. Physical violence against U. S. women around the time of pregnancy, 2004-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):317-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.013

Perales MT, Cripe SM, Lam N, Sanchez SE, Sanchez E, Williams MA. Prevalence, types, and pattern of intimate partner violence among pregnant women in Lima, Peru. Violence Against Women. 2009;15(2):224-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329387

Chan KL, Brownridge DA, Tiwari A, Fong DY, Leung WC, Ho PC. Associating pregnancy with partner violence against Chinese women. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(7):1478-500. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260510369134

Durand JG, Schraiber LB. Violence during pregnancy among public health care users in the Greater São Paulo area: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2007;10(3):310-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2007000300003

Menezes TC, Amorim MMR, Santos LC, Faúndes A. Domestic Physical Violence and Pregnancy:Results of a Survey in the Postpartum Period. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2003;25(5):309-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032003000500002

Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC; WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss - towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(3):287-96. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007

Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Oliveira Neto AF, Parpinelli MA, Sousa MH, Say L, et al. Pre-validation of the WHO organ dysfunction based criteria for identification of maternal near miss. Reprod Health. 2011;8:22. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-22

Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9339):1083-8. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Watts CH; WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368(9543): 1260-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8

Ludermir AB, Schraiber LB, D'Oliveira AF, França-Junior I, Jansen HA. Violence against women by their intimate partner and common mental disorders. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(4):1008-18. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.021

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

Marinheiro ALV, Vieira EM, Souza L. Prevalence of violence against women users of health services. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40(4):604-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000500008

Schraiber LB, D'Oliveira AFPL, Couto MT, Hanada H, Kiss LB, Durand JG, et al. Violence against women attending public health services in the metropolitan area of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(3);359-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000300006

Silva EP, Ludermir AB, Araújo TVB, Valongueiro SA. Frequency and pattern of intimate partner violence before, during and after pregnancy. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45(6):1044-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011005000074

D'Oliveira AFPL, Schraiber LB, França-Junior I, Ludermir AB, Portella AP, Diniz CS, et al. Factors associated with intimate partner violence against Brazilian women. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43(2):299-311. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000013

Taillieu TL, Brownridge DA. Violence against pregnant women: Prevalence, patterns, risk factors, theories,and directions for future research. Aggression Violent Behavior. 2010;15(1):14-35. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.07.013

Costa DCS, Ribeiro MRC, Batista RFL, Valente CM, Ribeiro JVF, Almeida LA, et al. Factors associated with physical violence against pregnant women from São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil: an approach using structural equation modeling. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017;33(1):e00078515. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00078515

Shamu S, Abrahams N, Temmerman M, Musekiwa A, Zarowsky C. A systematic review of African studies on intimate partner violence against pregnant women: prevalence and risk factors. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17591. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017591

Han A, Stewart DE. Maternal and fetal outcomes of intimate partner violence associated with pregnancy in the Latin American and Caribbean region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(1):6-11. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.037

Mendoza MEF, Hernández GM, Zárate MLP, Becerra TL. Violencia de género, embarazo y autoestima en un área urbana de la ciudad de México. Rev Enferm Herediana. 2008;1(1):40-7.

Salazar M, Valladares E, Ohman A, Högberg U. Ending Intimate Partner Violence after pregnancy: Findings from a community-based longitudinal study in Nicaragua. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:350. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-350

Silverman JG, Balaiah D, Ritter J, Dasgupta A, Boyce SC, Decker MR, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with violence and maltreatment from husbands and in-laws: findings from Indian slum communities. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):109. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0223-z

Lucena KDT, Deininger LSC, Coelho HFC, Monteiro ACC, Vianna RPT, Nascimento JA. Analysis of the cycle of domestic violence against Women. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26(2):139-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.119238

Quintanilla BPA, Taft A, McDonald S, Pollock W, Roque Henriquez JC. Social determinants and maternal exposure to intimate partner violence of obstetric patients with severe maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013270. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013270

Serruya SJ, Mucio B, Martinez G, Mainero L, Francisco A, Say L, et al. Exploring the Concept of Degrees of Maternal Morbidity as a Tool for Surveillance of Maternal Health in Latin American and Caribbean Settings. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8271042

Haddad SM, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Sousa MH, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, et al. Applying the maternal near miss approach for the evaluation of quality of obstetric care: a worked example from a Multicenter Surveillance Study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/989815

Downloads

Publicado

2018-06-26

Edição

v. 28 n. 2 (2018)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis