Família, relativismo cultural e injustiça social no campo do desenvolvimento humano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38124Palavras-chave:
Família, Relativismo cultural, Desenvolvimento Humano, Sociologia, Antropologia.Resumo
Há um grave equivoco subjacente à propaganda a-critica (e à prática que dela decorre) que se faz hoje do relativismo cultural, que consiste em confundir a perspectiva antropológica que - muito justamente - enterrou definitivamente todas as formas de etnocentrismo e, junto com elas, as idéias nazistas e eugênicas da raça ou cultura superior, com a perspectiva sodológica que - de modo igualmente justo - busca descrever a persistência e, por que não, o incremento da injustiça social. Estas duas perspectivas enfocam aspectos visceralmente distintos da realidade que, se confundidos, dão margem a graves problemas que dificultam e, às vezes, impedem a compreensão adequada do mundo contemporaneo, fazendo com que as pessoas encontrem dificuldades para distinguir, simplificando, padrões culturais de pobreza. Estes equivocos e as confusões deles decorrentes permeiam, também, o campo da familia e do desenvolvimento humano.Downloads
Referências
Bourdieu P. Coisas ditas. São Paulo, Brasiliense, 1990.
Ministério da Saúde/FIOCRUZ. Súmula, 47, 1994.
Mamo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento da Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. S.P/RJ. Hucitec/Abrasco, 1992.
Werner J, Espirito Santo KA. Desenvolvimento e aprendizagem da criança. Rev. Bras. Cres. Des. Hum., 3(1):99-110, 1993.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
