A procura do ambiente ótimo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39763Palavras-chave:
psicologia ambiental, amor, ambiente ótimo.Resumo
O autor propõe o amor como o responsável pelo ambiente ótimo, indicando isso não ter sido visto pela psicologia. Descreve alguns resultados obtidos em pesquisas a partir de psicoterapias, do tratamento da delinqüência juvenil, do tratamento e prevenção da doença cardíaca e do ambiente de trabalho. Cada um destes estudos representa uma série de diversos ambientes onde uma classificação mais abrangente de amor - como um aspecto suportivo e afirmativo de qualquer ambiente social - elucidaria a sua importância para a psicologia ambiental. Finaliza manifestando o desejo de que o “Fator Amor” venha a ser considerado o mais importante comportamento a ser mensurado em todo e qualquer ambiente.Downloads
Referências
Argyle M. The psychology of happiness. 2nded. New York: Taylor y Francis, 2001.
Argyle M, Henderson M. The anatomy of relationships. Harmondsworth, UK: Penquin,1985.
Argyle M, Furnham A. Sources of satisfaction and conflict in long term relationships. Journal of Marriage and The Family. 1983; 45:481-493.
Bechtel R. Environment & behavior, an introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
Bell P, Fisher , Baum A, Greene T. Environmental psychology. 4th ed. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace, 1996.
Carroll L. Alice ́s adventures in Wonderland. London: Macmillan, 1865.
Cheek N, Field D, Burdge R. Leisure and recreation places. Ann Arbor MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers, 1976.
Ekman P, Friesen W. Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1975.
Fleishman E, Harris E. Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnal Psychology. 1962;15:43-56.
Gifford R. Environmental psychology. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.
Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman B. The motivation to work. New York: Wiley,1959.
Ornish D. Dr. Dean Ornish ́s program for reversing heart disease. New York: Ballentine,1990.
Ornish D. Love and survival: the scientific baisfor the healing power of intimacy. New York: Harper Collins, 1998.
Rosenzweig S. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy: “At last, the Dodo said, ́Everybody has won and all musthave prizes”. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1936; 6:298-304.
Wampold B. The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
Wolf M. Serious delinquent behavior as part of a significantly handicapping condition: cures and supportive environments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1987; 20:347-359.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
