Editorial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.44931Resumo
On 11 and 12 April 2012, the Supreme Federal Court (STF), in a memorable decision, upheld the claim of non-compliance with the fundamental precept 54 (ADPF), proposed in June 2004 by the National Confederation of Health Workers. For a large majority (eight votes to two), it was decided that the pregnant women with an anencephalic fetus(severe fetal malformation incompatible with life outside the womb) may interrupt the pregnancy, if she wishes - in public health or private physician -without having to undergo a real legal pilgrimage.Downloads
Referências
Mingati V, Goés W, Costa I. O Aborto do Feto Anencefálico e a Questão Constitucional. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2012;22(2):133-41.
“Projeto propõe sustar decisão do STF sobre aborto de anencéfalos”. Disponível no site Gazeta Web, em: Projeto propõe sustar decisãodo STF sobre aborto de anencéfalos. Acesso em: 13.05.2012.
Fernandes MC. Interrupção de gravidez de fetoanencéfalo: uma análise Constitucional. In: Sarmento D, Piovesan F, editors. Nos limites davida: aborto, clonagem humana e eutanásia soba perspectiva dos direitos humanos. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris; 2007. p. 111-58.
ANIS. Instituto de Bioética, Direitos Humanose Gênero (Org.) Anencefalia, O pensamento brasileiro em sua pluralidade. Brasilia: Editora Letras Livres, 2004.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
