Públicos Digitais, Contestação Digital: uma nova transformação estrutural da esfera pública?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v18i1p55-74Palavras-chave:
públicos digitais, digitalização, ativismo digital, desobediência civil digital, esfera públicaResumo
Neste artigo o autor aborda a questão da digitalização da esfera pública a partir das transformações dos métodos de confronto, incluindo desobediência civil. Ao olhar mais de perto algumas das características estruturais da digitalização, busca então enfrentar os problemas conceituais, normativos e políticos levantados por ela. Dentro do limitado espaço desta contribuição, no entanto, as seguintes reflexões poderão ser somente tentativas e servir como preliminares para discussões futuras.
Downloads
Referências
ARENDT, H. ‘Civil Disobedience’, in Arendt, H. Crises of the Republic. New York: HBC, 1972, p.49-102.
BALIBAR, E. What We Owe to the Sans-papiers. Trad. Jason Francis Mc Gimsey and Erika Doucette. Flee, Erase, Territorialize. 1, 1996 (s/p). disponível em: https://transversal.at/transversal/0313/balibar/en (último acesso: 30 de setembro de 2022).
BENNETT, L. SEGERBERG, A. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society 15, 2012, p.1–30
BOHMAN, J. Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy. In. Roberts, J. Crossley (orgs.) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, p. 131–55.
CARTY, V. The Internet and Social Movements. In. Snow, D. Della Porta, D. Klandermans, B. McAdam, D. (orgs). The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Reference Online, 2013.
CELIKATES, R. BLOOIS, J. JANSEN (orgs.) The Irregularization of Migration in Contemporary Europe: Detention, Deportation, Drowning. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
CELIKATES, R. Habermas: Sprache, Verständigung und sprachliche Gewalt. In. Kuch, H. Herrmann, S. K. (orgs.) Philosophien sprachlicher Gewalt. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2010, p.272–285.
CELIKATES, R. Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Civic Freedom’, in. Owen, D. (org.) On Global Citizenship: James Tully in Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury, 2014, p.207–228.
COLEMAN, G. Anonymous in Context: The Politics and Power behind the Mask. Internet Governance Paper. No. 3. Waterloo: CIGI, 2013.
CRITICAL ART ENSEMBLE. Electronic Civil Disobedience and Other Un- popular Ideas. New York: Autonomedia, 1996.
CROUCH, C. Post-democracy. A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity, 2004.
DOMINGUEZ, R. Electronic Civil Disobedience Post-9/11. Third Text 22:5, 2008, p. 661–70.
DOUZINAS, C. Radical Philosophy Encounters the Uprisings: Lessons from Greece. In. Celikates, R. Kreide, R. Wesche, T. Transformations of Democracy. Crisis, protest and legitimation. Mayland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015, p. ??
DUPUIS-DÉRI, F. Global Protesters versus Global Elites. Are Direct Action and Deliberative Politics Compatible?. New Political Science. 29, 2007, p.167–186.
FRASER, N. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. Theory, Culture & Society. 24, 2007, p. 7–30.
GEORGE, C. Rise of the Unruly: Media Activism and Civil Disobedience. in. Id. Freedom from the Press. Singapore: NUS Press, 2012, p. 183–99.
GEORGE, C. The Internet as a Platform for Civil Disobedience, in. John Hartley, J. Burgess, J. Bruns, A. (eds.) A Companion to New Media Dynamics, ed. Oxford: Blackwell Reference Online, 2013, p.385-395.
GERBAUDO, P. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press, 2012.
GÖLE, N. Public Space Democracy. in. Eurozine. 29 de julho de 2013. Disponível em: https://www.eurozine.com/public-space-democracy/ (último acesso: 17 de outubro de 2022).
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II. Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Trad. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.
HABERMAS, J. Between Facts and Norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Trad. William Rehg. Boston: MIT, 1996.
HABERMAS, J. Political Communication in the Media Society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory. 16, 2006, p. 411-426.
KREIDE, R. Democracy in Crisis: Why Political Philosophy Needs Social Theory. Trad. Ciaran Cronin. In. Celikates, R.; Kreide, R.; Wesche, T. (orgs.) Transformations of Democracy. Crisis, protest and legitimation. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015, p. ??
LOVINK, G. Techno-Politics at Wikileaks. In. Id. Networks without a Cause. Cambridge: Polity, 2011, p. 176–86.
LUHMANN, N. Risk: A Sociological Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2002.
MEIKLE, G. Intercreativity: Mapping Online Activism, in. Hunsinger, J.; Lisbeth Klastrup , L; Allen, M. (eds.) International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, p. 363–377.
MILAN, S. WikiLeaks, Anonymous, and the Exercise of Individuality: Protesting in the Cloud. in Brevini, B. Hintz, A. McCurdy (orgs.) Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications for the Future of Communications, Journalism and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013, p. 191–208.
MILL, J. S. On Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1989.
MOROZOV, E. To Save Everything Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs, 2013.
MÜNKER, S. Emergenz digitaler Öffentlichkeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2009.
PETERS, B. The Meaning of the Public Sphere. In. Wessler, H. (org.) Public Deliberation and Public Culture. The Writings of Bernhard Peters. London: Palgrave McMillan, 2008, p. 33-67.
POELL, T. KLOET, J. GUOHUA, Z. Will the Real Weibo Please Stand Up? Chinese Online Contention and Actor-Network Theory. Chinese Journal of Communica- tion. 7, 2014, p.1–18.
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
SAUTER, M. The Coming Swarm: DDOS Actions, Hacktivism, and Civil Disobedience on the Internet. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
SCHAUER, F. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity, 1982.
SEN, A. Poverty and Famines: An essay on entitlement and depression. Oxford: Oxford University, 1981.
SMITH, W. Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. London: Routledge, 2013
SUSTEIN, C. Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2003.
TILLY, C. TARROW, S. Contentious Politics. Oxford: Oxford University, 2007.
TULLY, J. On the Global Multiplicity of Public Spheres: The Democratic Transformation of the Public Sphere?. In. Emden, C. Midgley, D. (orgs.) Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere. New York: Berghahn Books, 2013, p.169–204.
TUMBER, H. WAISBORD, S. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. New York: Routledge, 2021.
YOUNG, I. M. Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory. 29, 2001, p.670-690.
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista para fins não comerciais.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
