O estudo da cognição: em direção a uma perspectiva incorporada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e210099Palavras-chave:
enativismo, teorias enativas, 4E cognição, interação, teorias encarnadasResumo
O campo da cognição tem uma longa história na qual modelos formais, o corpo, e a interação com o mundo físico e social tiveram significados e papéis variados. Nos últimos anos, as propostas tentaram reintroduzir o corpo e a variabilidade cognitiva resultante da sensibilidade a contextos ricos e imprevisíveis. Este artigo apresenta o enativismo autopoiético, uma das versões essenciais das teorias corporizadas dentro das ciências cognitivas, apontando algumas limitações das teorias clássicas de processamento de informação e as suas noções de representação. Nesse distanciamento, as ciências cognitivas recuperaram o corpo, a sensibilidade e flexibilidade dos processos cognitivos, a natureza dinâmica da experiência e o valor dos sistemas culturais que sustentam a atividade cognitiva.
Downloads
Referências
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971/2003). The control of short-term memory. In B. Baars, W. Banks, & J. Newman (Eds.), Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness (pp. 373-388). Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. (2nd ed., revised). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Bechtel, W. (1991). Filosofía de la mente: Una panorámica para la ciencia cognitiva. Salamanca: Tecnos.
Bejarano, A. (2021). La intersubjetividad en la infancia temprana. (Tesis de Doctorado) Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1961). The Development of Intelligence in Children. In J. J. Jenkins, & D. G. Paterson (Eds.), Studies in individual differences: The search for intelligence (pp. 81-111). Connecticut: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Brentano, F. (1874/2020). Psicología: Desde el punto de vista empírico. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme.
Bühler, K. (1913). Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes. Jena: Fischer.
Cekaite, A., & Holm, M. K. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301293
Chaves Peña, D. & Yáñez-Canal, J. (2018). Fenomenología y Psicología del Desarrollo: La Búsqueda de una Articulación. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Clark, A. (1990). Connectionist Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 90, 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/90.1.83
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , 4, 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
Di Paolo, E. A. (2016). Participatory object perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(5-6), 228-258. Recuperado de https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-58034-011
Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3
Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What Computers Can´t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York: Harper & Row.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1985). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press.
Fierro, M. (2011). El desarrollo conceptual de la ciencia cognitiva. Parte I. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 40(3), 519-533. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74502011000300011
Foerster, H. V. (1985). Sicht und Einsicht: Versuche zu einer operativen Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin: Vieweg Verlag.
Froese, T. & Di Paolo, E. A. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 191(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro
Froese, T. & Gallaher, D. (2012). Getting Interaction Theory (IT) Together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 436-468. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.13.3.06fro
Fuchs, T. (2017). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & Jordan. Scott (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction (pp. 3-24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2014.00508
Funke, J. (2001). Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgement. Thinking & Reasoning, 7(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780042000046
Gallagher, S. (2009). Two problems of intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies , 16(6-8), 289-308. Recuperado de https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/1137/
Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25-26, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2014). La Mente Fenomenológica. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Gallagher, S. (2020). Action and Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , 4, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror Neurons, Embodied Simulation, and the Neural Basis of Social Identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(5), 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481880903231910
Goldstein, K. (1961). La Naturaleza Humana a la Luz de la Psicopatología. Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidós.
Greenwood, J. (2015). Becoming Human: The Ontogenesis, metaphysics and expression of human emotionality. Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
Guillaume, P. (1964). Psicología de la Forma. Buenos Aires: Editorial Psique.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
Kiverstein, J. (2018). Extended Cognition. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 19-40). 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Köhler, W. (1972). Psicología de la Forma: Su tarea y últimas experiencias. Barcelona: Biblioteca Nueva.
Krueger, J., & Osler, L. (2019). Engineering Affect: Emotion Regulation, the Internet, and the Techno-Social Niche. Philosophical Topics, 47(2), 205-231. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201947223
Kyselo, M. (2014). The body social: An enactive approach to the self. Frontiers in Psychology , 5, 986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00986
León, F., Szanto, T., & Zahavi, D. (2019). Emotional sharing and the extended mind. Synthese, 196(12), 4847-4867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1351-x
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1997). De máquinas e seres vivos: Autopoiese, a organização do vivo. 3a. ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (2003). El árbol del conocimiento: Las bases biológicas del entendimiento humano. Barcelona: Lumen.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1953). La Estructura del Comportamiento. Buenos Aires: Librería Hachette.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1985). Fenomenología de la Percepción. Barcelona: Planeta Agostini.
Moran, D. (2017). Intercorporeality and Intersubjectivity: A Phenomenological Exploration of Emodiment. In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 25-46). Massachusetts: The MIT Press
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). 4E Cognition: Historical Roots, Key Concepts, and Central Issues. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 3-15). 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
Piaget, J. (1983). La psicología de la Inteligencia. Barcelona: Crítica.
Putnam, H. (2017). Representación y Realidad: Un Balance Crítico del Funcionalismo (3a. ed.). Ciudad de México: Gedisa.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2013). Young children’s dialogical actions: The beginnings of purposeful intersubjectivity. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2013.2273258
Reddy, V. (2018) Why engagement: A second-person take on social cognition. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (2018), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 433-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1987). Guiones, planes, metas y entendimiento. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. London: Karnac Books.
Thagard, P. (2008). La Mente: Introducción a las Ciencias Cognitivas. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
Thomas, M. S. C., & McClelland, J. L. (2008). Connectionist models of cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 23-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press .
Treisman, A. (1969/2003). Strategies and models of selective attention. In B. J. Baars, W. P. Banks, & J. B. Newman (Eds.), Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness (pp. 207-225). Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
Tronick, E., & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist, 66(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021631
Varela, F. J. (2000). El fenómeno de la vida. Mallorca: Dolmen.
Varela, F. J. (1990). Conocer: Las ciencias cognitivas: tendencias y perspectivas: cartografia de las ideas actuales. Madrid: Gedisa.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). De cuerpo presente. Las ciencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana. Madrid: Gedisa .
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Crítica .
Walsh, P. J. (2019). Intercorporeity and the first-person plural in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review, 53, 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09480-x
Ward, D., & Stapleton, M. (2012). Es are good: Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective, and extended. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the Natural and Social context in Shaping Consciousness (pp. 89-104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson, R.A. & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied Cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/
Wundt, W. (1912). An Introduction to Psychology. London: The MacMillan Company.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Psicologia USP
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo de Psicologia USP está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons BY-NC, exceto onde identificado diferentemente.
A aprovação dos textos para publicação implica a cessão imediata e sem ônus dos direitos de publicação para a revista Psicologia USP, que terá a exclusividade de publicá-los primeiramente.
A revista incentiva autores a divulgarem os pdfs com a versão final de seus artigos em seus sites pessoais e institucionais, desde que estes sejam sem fins lucrativos e/ou comerciais, mencionando a publicação original em Psicologia USP.
