Social value appraisal: cutting the Gordian knot

Autores

  • Irene D.M Ciccarino Centro de Investigação Aplicada em Gest~ao e Economia da Escola de Tecnologia e Gest~ao do Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (CARME/ESTG/IPLeiria), Leiria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-4154
  • Susana Cristina Serrano Fernandes Rodrigues Centro de Investigaç~ao Aplicada em Gest~ao e Economia da Escola de Tecnologia e Gest~ao do Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (CARME/ESTG/IPLeiria), Leiria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-7001
  • Jorge Ferreira Da Silva IAG – Escola de Negócios da PUC-Rio, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-07-2021-0143

Palavras-chave:

Value creation, Social value, Social innovation, Social investment, Social value appraisal

Resumo

Purpose: Social initiatives must disclose their results to achieve support. However, there is no theoretical consensus about how to do it. It is still necessary to understand the value creation in social initiatives because they may or may not have economic goals. However, economic goals serve to make social goals feasible. This study tries to cut this Gordian knot by providing measures aligned with the value theory but developed by the social lens. It offers a non-economic-focused approach to assessing complexity and multiple stakeholders' information.      

Methodology: Three composed measures built upon tested and reliable scales suggest a consolidation research path. We have discussed these value measures through narratives from Portuguese investors and social entrepreneurs in a mixed-methods design. Content analysis and online survey provided data for descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's Alpha test.

Findings: The analyses supported the value measures. Thus, they allow an effective way to assess and report the social value created. It also highlighted a potential use in preventive and corrective approaches helpful for several organizations that pursue social goals.

Research limitations/implications: The measures were tested based on social entrepreneurs’ opinions. Future studies can include beneficiaries’ opinions, allowing comparisons that can help to set more realistic goals and better investment criteria.

Originality/value: The relationship between investors and initiatives can improve, boosting their impact on society. The measures can highlight prioritization choices that influence the way value is created. Hence, they serve as sensemaking from a holistic standpoint.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

André, K; Cho, CH; Laine, M. (2018). “Reference points for measuring social performance: Case study of a social business venture.” Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 660–678.

Bacq, S; Eddleston, KA. (2018). “A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact”. Journal of Business Ethics, 152; 589–611.

Barki, E; Rodrigues, J; Comini, GM (2020). “Impact business: a concept under construction”. Iberoamerican Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 9 (4), 477-501

Biedma-Velázquez, L; García-Rodríguez, MI; Serrano-del-Rosal, R. (2018) “Social hierarchy of pain and its connection to the memory of previously suffered pain”. Journal of Pain Research, 11, 2949-2959

Borzaga, C; Depedri, S; Galera, G. (2012). “Interpreting social enterprises”. R.Adm., São Paulo, 47(3), 398-409.

Bosma, N; Schøtt, T; Terjesen, S; Kew, P. (2016). “GEM 2015 special report on social entrepreneurship.” Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 1–74.

Bowman, C; Ambrosini, V. (2000). “Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value strategy.” British Journal of Management, 11,1-15

Brandenburger, AM; Stuart, HW Jr. (1996). “Value-based business strategy”. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163

Ciccarino, IDM; Rodrigues, SCSF. (2019) “Social entrepreneurship: what people are looking for when they talk about it?” IGI Global.

Clark, C; Brennan, L. (2012). “Entrepreneurship with social value: a conceptual model for performance measurement”. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 18 (2).

Combs, JG; Crook, TR; Shook, CL. (2005). The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. In Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 259–286.

Dees, JG. (1998a). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76,55-67.

Defourny, J; Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.

Dwivedi, A.; Weerawardena, J. (2018). “Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct.” Journal of Business Research, vol. 86, p. 32-40.

El Ebrashi, R. (2013). “Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact”. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 9 Iss 2. 2013,p.p. 188 – 209

European Commission (2016): Social Enterprises and their eco-systems: developments in Europe.

Hadad, S; Găucă, O. (2014). “Social impact measurement in social entrepreneurial organizations”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 9(2), 119‐136.

Hair Jr, JF; Anderson, RE; Tatham, R.L; Black, WC.( 2010) “Multivariate Data Analysis.” Prentice Hall Inc., 7th Edition, New Jersey.

Hamann, PM; Schiemann, F; Bellora, L; Guenther, TW. (2013). Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Performance: A Construct Validity Study. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 67–87.

Hlady-Rispal, M; Servantie, V (2018). “Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 62–80.

Hossain, S; Saleh, MA; Drennan, J. (2017). “A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting”. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 347–368.

IMP - Impact Management Project (2019). Retrieved https://impactmanagementproject.com/ 10/16/2019

Khan,SH; Yasir,M; Shah,HA; Majid,A (2021). Role of social capital and social value creation in augmenting sustainable performance of social enterprises. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 15(1), 118-137.

Lee, M.; Battilana, J.; Wang, T. (2014). “Building an Infrastructure for Empirical Research on Social Enterprise: Challenges and Opportunities.” Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods9, 241-264

Lepak, DP; Smith, KG; Taylor, MS. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194.

Leviner, N; Crutchfield, LR; Wells, D. (2006). “Understanding the Impact of Social Entrepreneurs: Ashoka’s answer to the challenge of measuring effectiveness.” ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3)

Lüdeke-Freund, F; Carrouxb, S; Massad, L; Breuer, H. (2018). “The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation”. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15;145–162

Lumpkin, GT; Moss, TW; Gras, DM; Kato, S; Amezcua, AS. (2013). “Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all?” Small Business Econimy, 40, 761–783

Mair, J; Martí, I. (2006). “Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight”. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44

Menter, M; Göcke, L; Zeeb, C; Clauss, T. (2020) “A longitudinal perspective on business model innovation and firm performance” IN: European Academy of Management – EURAM.

Mulgan, G. (2006). “The Process of Social Innovation”. MIT Press – Innovations

Myrah, KK; Odinsky‐Zec, TL. (2013) "The V formation model: a unifying force for double bottom line ventures illustrated with European and North American examples", Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 91-108

Ormiston, J; Seymour, R. (2011). “Understanding Value Creation in Social Entrepreneurship: The Importance of Aligning Mission, Strategy and Impact Measurement”. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2 (2), 125-150.

Rawhouser, H; Cummings, M; Newbert, S L. (2019). Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1); 82–115

Remenyi, D; Williams, B; Money, A; Swartz, E. (1998). “Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method.” SAGE Publications

Salamon, LM; Sokolowski, SW (2016). “Beyond Nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the Third-Sector”. International Society for thirdy-sector research. Voluntas, 27:1515–1545

Símon-Moya, V; Revuelto-Taboada, L; Ribeiro, S. (2012). “Are success and survival factors the same for social and business ventures?”. Serv Bus 6, 219-242.

Snowden, D. (2002). “Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100–111.

Stahmer, SA; Shofer, FS; Marino, A; Shepherd, S; Abbuhl, S. (1998). “Do quantitative changes in pain intensity correlate with pain relief and satisfaction?”. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(9)

Stephan, U; Uhlaner, LM; Stride, C. (2015). “Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations.” Journal of International Business Studies 46, 308–331

Tate, WL; Bals, L. (2018). Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm. J Bus Ethics, 152, 803–826.

Van der Have, RP; Rubalcaba, L. (2016). “Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?”. Research Policy, 45(9).

Venkatraman, N; Prescott, JE (1990) “Environment‐strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications”. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 1-23.

Venkatraman, N; Ramanujam, V. (1986). “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches”. Academy of Management Review, 11(4) 801-814.

Publicado

2024-04-29

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Social value appraisal: cutting the Gordian knot. (2024). INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-07-2021-0143