“Fundamentalist, pragmatic, orunconcerned?”: an analysis ofconsumers’ willingness to discloseinformation online

Authors

  • Renata Monteiro Martins Department of Marketing, FGV-EAESP
  • Sofia Batista Ferraz Department of Marketing, FGV-EAESP
  • André Francisco Alcântara Fagundes Fagundes Department of Business, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2023-0099

Keywords:

Willingness to Disclose Information, Privacy Concern, Trust, Consumers' Attitudes Toward Privacy

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to propose an innovative model that integrates variables and examines the influence of internet usage expertise, perceived risk and attitude toward information control on privacy concerns (PC) and, consequently, in consumers’ willingness to disclose personal information online. The authors also propose to test the mediation role of trust between PCs and willingness to disclose information. Trust is not a predictor of PC but a causal mechanism – considering that the focus is to understand consumers’ attitudes and behavior regarding the virtual environment (not context-specific) (Martin, 2018).

Design/methodology/approach

The authors developed a survey questionnaire based on the constructs that compose the proposed model to collect data from 864 respondents. The survey questionnaire included the following scales: internet usage expertise from Ohanian (1990); perceived risk, attitude toward information control, trust and willingness to disclose personal information online from Malhotra et al. (2004); and PC from Castañeda and Montoro (2007). All items were measured on a Likert seven-point scale (1 = totally disagree; 7 = totally agree). To obtain Westin’s attitudinal categories toward privacy, respondents answered Westin’s three-item privacy index. For data analysis, the authors applied covariance-based structural equation modeling.

Findings

First, the proposed model explains the drivers of consumers’ disposition to provide personal information at a level that surpasses specific contexts (Martin, 2018), bringing the analysis to consumers’ level and considering their general perceptions toward data privacy. Second, the findings provide inputs to propose a better definition of Westin’s attitudinal categories toward privacy, which used to be defined only by individuals’ information privacy perception. Consumers’ perceptions about their abilities in using the internet, the risks, their beliefs toward information control and trust also help to delimitate and distinguish the fundamentalists, the pragmatics and the unconcerned.

Research limitations/implications

Some limitations weigh the theoretical and practical implications of this study. The sample size of pragmatic and unconcerned respondents was substantially smaller than that of fundamentalists. It might be explained by applying Westin’s self-report index to classify the groups according to their score regarding PCs. Most individuals affirm having a great concern for their data privacy but still provide online information for the benefit of personalization – known as the privacy paradox (Zeng et al., 2021). It leads to another limitation of this research, given the lack of measures that classify respondents by considering their actual behavior toward privacy.

Practical implications

PC emerges as an important predictor of consumer trust and willingness to disclose their data online, and trust also influences this disposition. Managers need to implement actions that effectively reduce consumers’ concerns about privacy and increase their trust in the company – e.g. adopting a clear and transparent policy on how the data collected is stored, treated, protected and used to benefit the consumer. Regarding the perception of risk, if managers convince consumers that the data collected on the internet is protected, they tend to be less concerned about privacy.

Social implications

The results suggest different aspects influencing the willingness to disclose personal information online, including different responses considering consumers’ PCs. Through their policies and legislation, the authors understand that governments must be attentive to this aspect, establishing regulations that protect consumers’ data in the virtual environment. In addition to regulatory policies, education campaigns can be carried out for both consumers and managers to raise the discussion about privacy and the availability of information in the online environment, demonstrating the importance of protecting personal data to benefit the government, consumers and organizations.

Originality/value

Although there is increasing research on consumers’ privacy, studies have not considered their attitudinal classifications – high, moderate and low concern – as moderators of willingness to disclose information online. Researchers have also increased attention to the antecedents of PCs and disclosure of information but overlooked possible mechanisms that explain the relationship between them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre, E., Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Wetzels, M. (2016). The personalization-privacy paradox: implications for new media. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 98–110, doi: 10.1108/JCM-06-2015-1458.

Aloysius, J. A., Hoehle, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2016). Exploiting big data for customer and retailer benefits: a study of emerging mobile checkout scenarios. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(4), 467–486, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0147.

Anic, I. D., Škare, V., & Milaković, I. K. (2019). The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36, 100868, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100868.

Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13–28, doi: 10.2307/25148715.

Bandyopadhyay, S., & Bandyopadhyay, K. (2018). How consumers in India react to online privacy concerns. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 26(3-4), 183–194, https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA588655392&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=23304103&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ee5ddbcb7

Castañeda, J. A., & Montoro, F. J. (2007). The effect of internet general privacy concern on customer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 117–141, doi: 10.1007/s10660-007-9000-y.

Chang, S. E., Shen, W. C., & Liu, A. Y. (2016). Why mobile users trust smartphone social networking services? A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4890–4895, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.048.

Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2-3), 181–2005, doi: 10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y.

Chen, C. P., & Zhang, C. Y. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques, and technologies: a survey on big data. Information Sciences, 275, 314–347, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015.

Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188, doi: 10.2307/41703503.

Cisco. (2021). Consumer privacy survey: Building consumer confidence through transparency and control. Retrieved from www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/trust-center/docs/cisco-cybersecurity-series-2021-cps.pdf

Dholakia, N., Darmody, A., Zwick, D., Dholakia, R. R., & Fırat, A. F. (2021). Consumer choicemaking and choicelessness in hyperdigital marketspaces. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 65–74, doi: 10.1177/0276146720978257.

Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2005). Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 7–29, doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415100201.

Dudley-Nicholson, J. (2018). Facebook users are deleting their accounts after it was revealed their data was used in the 2016 US election. 20 Match News Corp Australia Network. Retrieved from www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/facebook-users-are-deleting-their-accounts-after-it-was-revealed-their-data-was-used-in-the-2016-us-election/news-story/41a355e6846865ba37525624a98e2fb0

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Grandison, T., & Sloman, M. (2000). A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 3(4), 2–16, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2000.5340804.

Gandon, F. L., & Sadeh, N. M. (2004). Semantic web technologies to reconcile privacy and context awareness. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(3), 241–260, doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2003.07.008.

Grosso, M., Castaldo, S., Li, H. A., & Larivière, B. (2020). What information do shoppers share? The effect of personnel-, retailer-, and country-trust on willingness to share information. Journal of Retailing, 96(4), 524–547, doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2020.08.002.

Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M. L., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais baseada em covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação como uma ferramenta de pesquisa de marketing. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 44–55, doi: 10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7th Edition., NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoadley, C. M., Xu, H., Lee, J. J., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). Privacy as information access and illusory control: the case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(1), 50–60, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.05.001

Ingram, D. (2018). Facebook says data leak hits 87 million users, widening privacy scandal. Reuters, 4 April. Retrieved from www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-privacy-idUSKCN1HB2CM

Kasper, D. V. S. (2005). The evolution (or devolution) of privacy. Sociological Forum, 20(1), 60–92, doi: 10.1007/s11206-005-1898-z.

Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635, doi: 10.1111/isj.12062.

Kim, M. S., & Kim, S. (2018). Factors influencing willingness to disclose personal information for personalized recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 143–152, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.031.

Kim, D., Park, K., Park, Y., & Ahn, J. H. (2019). Willingness to disclose personal information: Perspective of privacy calculus in IoT services. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 273–281, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.022.

Kumaraguru, P., & Cranor, L. F. (2005). Privacy indexes: a survey of westin's studies, Pittsburgh, PA: Institute for Software Research International.

Lin, S. W., & Liu, Y. C. (2012). The effects of motivations, trust, and privacy concern in social networking. Service Business, 6(4), 411–424, doi: 10.1007/s11628-012-0158-6.

Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Molina-Castillo, F. J. (2008). Customer knowledge management and E-Commerce: the role of customer perceived risk. International Journal of Information Management, 28(2), 102–113, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.09.001.

Mai, J. E. (2016). Big data privacy: the datafication of personal information. The Information Society, 32(3), 192–199, doi: 10.1080/01972243.2016.1153010.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. Retrieve from www.jstor.org/stable/23015787 doi: 10.1287/isre.1040.0032.

Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. Gold, (Ed.) Debates in the digital humanities, pp. 460–475. Minneapolis, MN: University of MN Press.

Margulis, S. T. (2003). Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 243–261, doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00063.

Markman, J. (2017). Amazon using AI, big data to accelerate profits. Forbes. 5 June. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/jonmarkman/2017/06/05/amazon-using-ai-big-data-to-accelerate-profits/?sh=2e1981d06d55

Marr, B. (2017). Want to use big data? Why not start via google, Facebook, amazon, (etc.). Forbes, 14 August. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2017/08/14/want-to-use-big-data-why-not-start-via-google-facebook-amazon-etc/?sh=78bf18d3d5db

Martin, K. (2018). The penalty for privacy violations: How privacy violations impact trust online. Journal of Business Research, 82, 103–116, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.034.

Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017). The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 135–155, doi: 10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4.

Martinez-Lopez, F. J., Pla-García, C., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., & Rodríguez-Ardura, I. (2014). Utilitarian motivations in online consumption: Dimensional structure and scales. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13(3), 188–204, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2014.02.002.

Michael, K., & Miller, K. W. (2013). Big data: New opportunities and new challenges. Computer, 46(6), 22–24, doi: 10.1109/MC.2013.196.

Milne, G. R., & Culnan, M. J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 15–29, doi: 10.1002/dir.20009.

Moore, A. (2008). Defining privacy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 411–428, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00433.x.

Mourey, J. A., & Waldman, A. E. (2020). Past the privacy paradox: the importance of privacy changes as a function of control and complexity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(2), 162–180. Retrieved from www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/708034, doi: 10.1086/708034.

Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life, Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52, doi: 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191.

Park, C., & Jun, J. K. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of internet buying behavior: the effects of internet usage, perceived risks, and innovativeness. International Marketing Review, 20(5), 534–553, doi: 10.1108/02651330310498771.

Pentland, A. (2013). The Data-Driven society. Scientific American, 309(4), 78–83. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/26018109

Pérez-Cabañero, C. (2007). Perceived risk on goods and service purchases. EsicMarket, 129, 193–199.

Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to disclose personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 27–41, doi: 10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941.

Pomfret, L., Previte, J., & Coote, L. (2020). Beyond concern: socio-demographic and attitudinal influences on privacy and disclosure choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5-6), 519–549, doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1715465.

Rohm, A. J., & Milne, G. R. (2004). Just what the doctor ordered: the role. Of Information Sensitivity and Trust in Reducing Medical Information Privacy Concern. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 1000–1011, doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00345-4.

Schifferle, L. W. (2016). Online tracking – more than cookies. Federal Trade Commission: Consumer Information, 23 June. Retrieved from www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2016/06/online-tracking-more-cookies

Schoenbachler, D. D., & Gordon, G. L. (2002). Trust and customer willingness to disclose information in Database-Driven relationship marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 2–16, doi: 10.1002/dir.10033.

Siau, K., & Shen, Z. (2003). Building customer trust in mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 91–94, doi: 10.1145/641205.641211.

Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy, Cambridge (MA: Harvard University Press.

Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C. H., & Phang, C. W. (2013). Addressing the Personalization-Privacy paradox: an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1141–1164. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/43825785 doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.07.

Swani, K., Milne, G. R., & Slepchuk, A. N. (2021). In press). revisiting trust and privacy concern in consumers' perceptions of marketing information management practices: Replication and extension. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2021.03.001.

Taylor, D. G., Davis, D. F., & Jillapalli, R. (2009). Privacy concern and online personalization: the moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 203–223, doi: 10.1007/s10660-009-9036-2.

Urbonavicius, S., Degutis, M., Zimaitis, I., Kaduskeviciute, V., & Skare, V. (2021). From social networking to willingness to disclose personal data when shopping online: Modelling in the context of social exchange theory. Journal of Business Research, 136, 76–85, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.031.

Weijo, H., Hietanen, J., & Matilla, P. (2014). New insights into online consumption communities and netnography. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2072–2078, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.015.

Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom, New York, NY: Atheneum.

Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431–453, doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00072.

Willis, B., Jai, T., & Lauderdale, M. (2021). Trust and commitment: Effect of applying consumer data rights on US consumers' attitudes toward online retailers in the big data era. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1575–1590, doi: 10.1002/cb.1968.

Wu, K. W., Huang, S. Y., Yen, D. C., & Popova, I. (2012). The effect of online privacy policy on consumer privacy concern and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 889–897, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.008.

Xie, E., Teo, H. H., & Wan, W. (2006). Volunteering personal information on the internet: Effects of reputation, privacy notices, and rewards on online consumer behavior. Marketing Letters, 17(1), 61–74, doi: 10.1007/s11002-006-4147-1.

Youn, S. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 389–418, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01146.x.

Zeng, F., Ye, Q., Li, J., & Yang, Z. (2021). Does self-disclosure matter? A dynamic two-stage perspective for the personalization-privacy paradox. Journal of Business Research, 124, 667–675, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.006.

Zhou, T. (2020). The effect of information privacy concern on users' social shopping intention. Online Information Review, 44(5), doi: 10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0298.

Zwitter, A. (2014). Big data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–6, doi: 10.1177/2053951714559253.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

Issue

Section

Research Paper