Messias’ influence? Intra-municipal relationship between political preferences and deaths in a pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575324gfllKeywords:
COVID-19, Political persuasion, Political polarization, IdeologyAbstract
Previous studies have shown that the percentage of votes for Jair Messias Bolsonaro in the 2018 presidential elections, at the municipal and state levels, is related to the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the number of deaths. We find the same effects at the intra-municipal level in the city of São Paulo. Using geolocation, we associate voting data with number of deaths for the 96 districts in the city. We analyze excess mortality to mitigate underreporting issues and to account for exogenous determinants of mortality, as well as control for age structure and several indicators of socioeconomic vulnerability. The results are significant and indicate the existence of a relationship between votes for Bolsonaro and deaths during the pandemic — between one and five additional deaths per 100k people for each percentage point of votes. Several robustness checks support our findings.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D. and M. O. Jackson (2015). History, expectations, and leadership in the evolution of social norms. The Review of Economic Studies 82(2), 423–456.
Ajzenman, N. (2021). The power of example: Corruption spurs corruption. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 13(2), 230–57.
Ajzenman, N., T. Cavalcanti, and D. Da Mata (2023). More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy (Forthcoming).
Allcott, H., L. Boxell, J. Conway, M. Gentzkow, M. Thaler, and D. Yang (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics 191, 104254.
Amaral, O. E. d. (2020). The Victory of Jair Bolsonaro According to the Brazilian Electoral Study of 2018. Brazilian Political Science Review 14(1).
Baqui, P., I. Bica, V. Marra, A. Ercole, and M. van Der Schaar (2020). Ethnic and regional variations in hospital mortality from COVID-19 in Brazil: a cross-sectional observational study. The Lancet Global Health 8(8), e1018–e1026.
Barberia, L., N. d. P. Moreira, R. d. J. Carvalho, M. L. C. Oliveira, I. S. C. Rosa, and M. Zamudio (2022). The relationship between ideology and COVID-19 deaths: What we know and what we still need to know. Brazilian Political Science Review 16.
Becher, M., D. Stegmueller, S. Brouard, and E. Kerrouche (2020). Comparative experimental evidence on compliance with social distancing during the covid-19 pandemic. medRxiv.
Bermudi, P. M. M., C. Lorenz, B. S. de Aguiar, M. A. Failla, L. V. Barrozo, and F. Chiaravalloti-Neto (2021). Spatiotemporal ecological study of COVID-19 mortality in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: shifting of the high mortality risk from areas with the best to those with the worst socio-economic conditions. Travel medicine and infectious disease 39, 101945.
Brandily, P., C. Brébion, S. Briole, and L. Khoury (2021). A poorly understood disease? the impact of Covid- 19 on the income gradient in mortality over the course of the pandemic. European Economic Review 140, 103923.
Brown, C. S. and M. Ravallion (2020). Inequality and the coronavirus: Socioeconomic covariates of behavioral responses and viral outcomes across US counties. NBER Working Paper 27549.
Bruce, R., S. Firpo, M. França, and L. Meloni (2020). Racial inequality in health care during a pandemic. Available at SSRN 3691313.
Bursztyn, L., G. Egorov, and S. Fiorin (2020). From extreme to mainstream: The erosion of social norms. American Economic Review 110(11), 3522–48.
Cabral, S., L. Pongeluppe, and N. Ito (2021). The Disastrous Effects of Leaders in Denial: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Brazil. Available at SSRN 3836147.
Calvo, E. and T. Ventura (2021). Will I Get COVID-19? Partisanship, Social Media Frames, and Perceptions of Health Risk in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 63(1), 1–26.
Castilho, M., V. Pero, F. Roubaud, M. Razafindrakoto, J. Saboia, et al. (2023). Negacionismo e o papel dos fatores políticos para a mortalidade por Covid-19 no Brasil. Nova Economia (forthcoming).
Castro, M. C., S. Kim, L. Barberia, A. F. Ribeiro, S. Gurzenda, K. B. Ribeiro, E. Abbott, J. Blossom, B. Rache, and B. H. Singer (2021). Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil. Science.
Chaib, J. and R. Machado (2021). CPI mira discursos do governo e levanta 200 falas negacionistas de Bol- sonaro.
Folha de S Paulo. Available at: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2021/04/cpi- mira-discursos-do-governo-e-levanta-200-falas-negacionistas-de-bolsonaro.shtml. Accessed 04/05/2021.
Chiavegatto Filho, A. D. P., S. L. D. Gotlieb, S. L. d. Almeida, and I. Kawachi (2013). Como incluir características dos distritos do município de São Paulo em estudos epidemiológicos?: Análise da desigualdade de renda pelo uso do propensity score matching. Saúde e Sociedade 22, 1145–1153.
Chu, D. K., E. A. Akl, S. Duda, K. Solo, S. Yaacoub, H. J. Schünemann, A. El-harakeh, A. Bognanni, T. Lotfi, M. Loeb, et al. (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person- to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet 395(10242), 1973–1987.
Duque, D., A. Simões Alberti, P. H. Campos, and G. Martins Luches (2020). Excesso de mortes é maior em microrregiões mais pobres. Available at: https://blogdoibre.fgv.br/posts/excesso-de- mortes-e-maior-em-microrregioes-mais-pobres. Accessed 29/04/2021.
FSP/USP (2021). A expectativa de imunidade coletiva por contágio causa a morte de centenas de milhares de brasileiros e ameaça o sistema único de saúde (SUS). Nota Técnica da Congregação da Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo. Available at: https://www.fsp.usp.br/site/ noticias/mostra/27251. Accessed 03/05/2021.
Gollwitzer, A., C. Martel, W. J. Brady, P. Pärnamets, I. G. Freedman, E. D. Knowles, and J. J. Van Bavel (2020).
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour 4(11), 1186–1197.
Gomes de Souza, H., C. Araújo, G. Barbosa, and A. Almeida (2019). Quais fatores foram determinantes no resultado da eleição presidencial brasileira em 2018? Anpec.
Gulino, G. and F. Masera (2022). Contagious dishonesty: Corruption scandals and supermarket theft. Available at SSRN 4129462.
Hallal, P. C. (2021). SOS Brazil: science under attack. The Lancet 397(10272), 373–374.
Instituto Pólis (2020). Raça e covid no município de São Paulo. Available at: https://polis.org.br/ estudos/racae-covid-no-msp/. Accessed 02/05/2021.
Layton, M. L., A. E. Smith, M. W. Moseley, and M. J. Cohen (2021). Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential election. Research & Politics 8(1), 2053168021990204.
Li, S. L., R. H. M. Pereira, C. A. Prete Jr, A. E. Zarebski, L. Emanuel, P. J. H. Alves, P. S. Peixoto, C. K. V. Braga, A. A. de Souza Santos, W. M. de Souza, R. J. Barbosa, L. F. Buss, A. Mendrone, C. de Almeida- Neto, S. C. Ferreira, N. A. Salles, I. Marcilio, C.-H. Wu, N. Gouveia, V. H. Nascimento, E. C. Sabino, N. R. Faria, and J. P. Messina (2021). Higher risk of death from COVID-19 in low-income and non-White populations of São Paulo, Brazil. BMJ Global Health 6(4).
Londoño, E., M. Andreoni, and L. Casado (2020). Bolsonaro, Isolated and Defiant, Dismisses Coronavirus Threat to Brazil. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/01/ world/americas/brazil-bolsonaro-coronavirus.html. Accessed 04/30/2021.
Long, E. F., M. K. Chen, and R. Rohla (2020). Political storms: Emergent partisan skepticism of hurricane risks. Science Advances 6(37), eabb7906.
Maher, P. J., P. MacCarron, and M. Quayle (2020). Mapping public health responses with attitude networks: the emergence of opinion-based groups in the UK’s early COVID-19 response phase. British Journal of Social Psychology 59(3), 641–652.
Mariani, L. A., J. Gagete-Miranda, and P. Rettl (2020). Words can hurt: How political communication can change the pace of an epidemic. Covid Economics 12, 104–137.
Mengue, P. (2021). Sem home office, periferia se expõe ao coronavírus no transporte público. O Estado de S. Paulo. Available at: https://sao-paulo.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,sem-home- office-periferia-se-expoe-mais-ao-coronavirus-no-transporte-publico,70003607614. Accessed 05/16/2021.
Orellana, J. D. Y., G. M. d. Cunha, L. Marrero, R. I. Moreira, I. d. C. Leite, and B. L. Horta (2021). Excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic: underreporting and regional inequalities in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 37(1).
Painter, M. and T. Qiu (2021). Political beliefs affect compliance with government mandates. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 185, 688–701.
Piketty, T. (2000, 01). Voting as Communicating. The Review of Economic Studies 67(1), 169–191.
Rache, B., M. Lago, F. Falbel, and R. Rocha (2021). Quantas vidas cabem em um voto? Nota Técnica IEPS (18).
Ramos, G., Y. Vieites, J. Jacob, and E. B. Andrade (2020, 08). Political orientation and support for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública 54, 697 – 713.
Razafindrakoto, M., F. Roubaud, J. Saboia, M. R. Castilho, and V. Pero (2022). Municípios in the time of Covid-19 in Brazil: socioeconomic vulnerabilities, transmission factors and public policies. The European Journal of Development Research 34(6), 2730–2758.
Rennó, L. R. (2020). The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections. Latin American Politics and Society 62(4), 1–23.
Ribeiro, K. B., A. F. Ribeiro, M. A. d. S. M. Veras, and M. C. de Castro (2021). Social inequalities and COVID-19 mortality in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Epidemiology.
Rocco, R., B. K. José, H. Carvalho, and L. Royer (2021). The impact of socio-spatial inequity: Covid-19 in São Paulo. In B. Ducet (Ed.), Global reflections on Covid-19 and urban inequalities, pp. 129–140. Great Britain: Bristol University Press.
Soderborg, S. and B. Muhtadi (2020). When is staying home partisan? policy conflict and precaution-taking during a pandemic. Preprint. Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/soderborg/files/trust_covid_long_d6.pdf. Accessed 01/02/2023.
Sturgis, P., J. Jackson, and J. Kuha (2020). Lockdown scepticism is part of the Brexit divide. LSE Covid 19 Blog.
Touchton, M., F. M. Knaul, H. Arreola-Ornelas, T. Porteny, M. Sánchez, O. Méndez, M. Faganello, V. Edelson, B. Gygi, C. Hummel, et al. (2021). A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil. BMJ Global Health 6(6), e005223.
Wang, H., K. R. Paulson, S. A. Pease, S. Watson, H. Comfort, P. Zheng, A. Y. Aravkin, C. Bisignano, R. M. Barber, T. Alam, et al. (2022). Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. The Lancet 399(10334), 1513–1536.
Xavier, D. R., E. L. e Silva, F. A. Lara, G. R. e Silva, M. F. Oliveira, H. Gurgel, and C. Barcellos (2022). Involvement of political and socio-economic factors in the spatial and temporal dynamics of COVID-19 outcomes in Brazil: A population-based study. The Lancet Regional Health-Americas, 100221.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luca Louzada, Guilherme Figueira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grant numbers 2020/16326-6
