True doing and the transition of government in the construction of a national common curricular basis: a political document too

Abstract

The study of a persuasion strategy between enunciator and enunciatee in discourses reveals the true doing of the resources in the language employed, which one desires to produce through strategies. Based on the published versions of the Brazilian Common Curriculum (BNCC), the three versions provided for public consultation (2015, 2016, 2017a) and the official one (2017b), we would like to analyze how the enunciator appropriates language, within a manipulation stance, established between the enunciator and the receiver. In each version, there is an establishing of make-belief through a true doing. We would also like to emphasize how the transition of the administration modifies the structure and perspectives given in each version. In other words, the BNCC may be acknowledged as the result of political stance and not merely the product of a collective construction, or rather, how the enunciator tries to persuade the enunciatee. Semiotic, French mode, will foreground discussions so that we may have an in-depth knowledge on how the subjects of the enunciation, enunciator and enunciatee, project themselves and are related.