Is there Truth in Interpretation? A framework for correctness in the interpretive domain based on the work of Joseph Raz

Authors

  • Caio Xavier Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-7547.hd.2024.205343

Keywords:

Interpretation, Truth, Joseph Raz, Epistemology, Analytic Philosophy

Abstract

This article aims at articulating a correctness criterium to interpretive propositions about a given object based on the fundamentals of Joseph Raz's work regarding the theory of interpretation and moral philosophy. It is depicted a problem situation in which many individuals contend over the best interpretation of a surrealist painting. In sequence, central premises of the razian thought are outlined and the model of parameters for evaluating interpretations is presented, grounded in a minimum level of correspondence with the interpreted object and in a degree of fostering of the targeted value by means of that modality of interpretive activity. At the end, the refered model is applied to settle on a reasoned basis the dispute first described.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Caio Xavier, Universidade de São Paulo

    Graduado em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de SãoPaulo (FDUSP) (2018-2022), sendo contemplado como Prêmio Melhor Aluno da turma de ingresso. Mestrando em Direito Civil na FDUSP, com ingresso em 2024. Assistente Jurídico da Seção de Direito Privado do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo. À época do envio do artigo, o autor ainda não tinha ingressado no mestrado.

References

DWORKIN, Ronald. Law’s Empire, New York: Harvard University Press, 1986

HONDERICH, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005

MACEDO JUNIOR, Ronaldo Porto. Do Xadrez à Cortesia: Dworkin e a teoria do direito contemporânea, São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013

MARMOR, Andrei. Positive Law and Objective Values, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001

MEYER, Lukas et al (org.). Rights, Culture, and the Law: themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003

MOORE, Michael. “Semantics of Judging”, in Southern California Law Review, 54, 1981, pp.151-294

NEIVA, Horácio. Introdução Crítica ao Positivismo Jurídico Exclusivo: a teoria do Direito de Joseph Raz, Salvador: JusPodivm, 2017

PALMER, Richard. Hermeneutics, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969

POSTEMA, Gerald. Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World, New York: Springer, 2011 (A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, v.11)

RAZ, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom, New York: Oxford University Press, 1986

RAZ, Joseph. Ethics in the Public Domain, New York: Oxford University Press,1994

RAZ, Joseph. Engaging Reason, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999

RAZ, Joseph. Practice of Value, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003

RAZ, Joseph. Value, Respect and Attachment, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004

RAZ, Joseph. Between Authority and Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009

STAVROPOULOS, Nico. Objectivity in Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996

WHRIGHT, Crispin. Truth and Objectivity, New York: Harvard University Press, 1992

Published

2024-11-06

Issue

Section

Academia

How to Cite

Xavier, C. (2024). Is there Truth in Interpretation? A framework for correctness in the interpretive domain based on the work of Joseph Raz. Humanidades Em diálogo, 13, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-7547.hd.2024.205343