Adaptação Transcultural do instrumento de vigilância do desenvolvimento infantil “Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC)” no contexto brasileiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.145001Palavras-chave:
Psicometria, tradução, desenvolvimento infantilResumo
Introdução: Diante da escassez de instrumentos de avaliação do desenvolvimento infantil adaptados culturalmente, validados e viáveis para uso na prática clínica no Brasil, é necessário maior investimento para disponibilização de recursos com boas propriedades psicométricas para uso clínico e cientifico.
Objetivo: Analisar o processo de adaptação transcultural do instrumento de vigilância do desenvolvimento infantil “Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC)” no contexto brasileiro.
Método: O SWYC é um instrumento de vigilância do desenvolvimento infantil, comportamento e fatores de risco para crianças menores de 65 meses, constituído pelos questionários - Developmental Milestones, Parent’s Observations of Social Interactions (POSI), Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist (BPSC), Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PPSC) e Family Questions. A adaptação transcultural seguiu as etapas recomendadas pela literatura e participaram 45 pais do primeiro pré-teste e 27 do segundo pré-teste. Para análise das propriedades de medida foi utilizada análise fatorial (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin–KMO), cálculo da validade convergente (Average Variance Extracted - AVE) e confiabilidade (consistência interna - Cronbach’s Alpha - CA).
Resultados: No primeiro pré-teste, os pais compreenderam apenas 31% dos itens. O comitê de especialistas reanalisou e modificou os questionários. No segundo pré-teste, o índice de compreensão foi 77%, dando origem a versão final. Os questionários Developmental Milestones, BPSC e PPSC foram considerados unidimensionais (KMO = 0,62 a 0,95) e apresentaram AVE = 0,52 a 0,73 e CA = 0,55 a 0,97.
Conclusão: Análise da qualidade dos itens, da validade convergente e da consistência interna da versão brasileira do SWYC revelou propriedades de medida satisfatórias, mostrando-se um instrumento promissor para uso clinico e em pesquisas com crianças no Brasil.
Downloads
Referências
Engle PL, Black MM, Behrman JR, Mello MC, Gertler PJ, Kapiriri L, et al. Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world. Lancet. 2007;369(9557):229-42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60112-3
Duby JC, Lipkin PH, Macias MM, Wegner LM, Duncan P, Hagan JF, et al. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home : an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):405-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1231
Campos D, Santos DCC, Gonçalves VMG, Goto MMF, Arias AV, Brianeze ACGS, et al. Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months. J Pediatr. 2006;82(6):470-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2223/JPED.1566
Sheldrick RC, Merchant S, Perrin EC. Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;128(2):356-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3261
Abubakar A, Holding P, van Baar A, Newton CR, van de Vijver FJ. Monitoring psychomotor development in a resource-limited setting: an evaluation of the Kilifi Developmental Inventory. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2008;28(3):217-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146532808X335679
Madaschi V, Mecca TP, Macedo EC, Paula CS. Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties. Paidéia. 2016;26(64):189-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272664201606
Fischer VJ, Morris J, Martines J. Developmental screening tools: feasibility of use at primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income settings. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014;32(2):314-26.
Filgueiras A, Pires P, Maissonette S, Landeira-Fernandez J. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-adapted version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in public child daycare centers. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(8):561-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.02.005
Barba PCSD, Rizzo IC, Serrano AM. Ages and Stages Questionnaires, um sistema facilitador do envolvimento parental e do conhecimento do desenvolvimento infantil. Rev Port Ter da Fala. 2015;4(3):23-9. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21281/rptf.2015.04.04
Santana CMT, Filgueiras A, Landeira-Fernandez J. Ages & Stages Questionnaire-Brazil-2011: Adjustments on an Early Childhood Development Screening Measure. Glob Pediatr Heal. 2015;2:1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X15610038
Epstein J, Santo Miyuki R, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
Santo RM, Ribeiro-Ferreira F, Alves MR, Epstein J, Novaes P. Enhancing the cross-cultural adaptation and validation process: linguistic and psychometric testing of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of a self-report measure for dry eye. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):370-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.009
Perrin EC, Sheldrick C, Visco Z, Mattern K. The Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC) User ’ s Manual [cited 2015 Sep 7] Available from: https://www.floatinghospital.org/-/media/Brochures/Floating-Hospital/ SWYC/ SWYC-Manual-v101-Web-Format-33016.ashx?la=en&hash=E0C2802F003ED312E9D5268374 C540A112151FB3
Sheldrick RC, Perrin EC. Evidence-based milestones for surveillance of cognitive, language, and motor development. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(6):577-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.001
Perrin EC, Sheldrick RC, McMenamy JM, Henson BS, Carter AS. Improving parenting skills for families of young children in pediatric settings: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(1):16-24. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2919
Perrin EC, Sheldrick RC, Henson BS, Merchant S. Survey of Wellbeing of Young hildren. SWYC Forms Portuguese. [cited 2015 Sep 7] Available from: https://www.floatinghospital.org/The-Survey-of-Wellbeing-of-Young-Children/Translations.aspx
Smith NJ, Sheldrick RC, Perrin EC. An abbreviated screening instrument for autismo spectrum disorders. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(2):149-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21356
Sheldrick RC, Henson BS, Neger EN, Merchant S, Murphy JM, Perrin EC. The baby pediatric symptom checklist: development and initial validation of a new social/emotional screening instrument for very young children. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(1):72-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2012.08.003
Sheldrick RC, Henson BS, Merchant S, Neger EN, Murphy JM, Perrin EC. The Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PPSC): development and initial validation of a new social/emotional screening instrument. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12(5):456-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2012.06.008
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Feraz M. Guidelines for process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Operacionalização de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição usados em epidemiologia. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(4):665-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006005000035
Losapio MF, Pondé MP. Tradução para o português da escala M-CHAT para rastreamento precoce de autismo. Rev Psiquiatr Rio Gd Sul. 2008;30(3):221-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082008000400011
Braccialli LMP, Braccialli AC, Sankako AN, Dechandt MLC, Almeida VS, Carvalho SMR. Questionário de Qualidade de Vida de Crianças com Paralisia Cerebral (Cp Qol-Child ): Tradução e Adaptação para Língua Portuguesa. J Hum. Growth Dev. 2013;23(2):154-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.61289
Jobe JB. Models and methods Cognitive psychology and self-reports : Models and Methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):219-27.
Raîche G, Walls TA, Magis D, Riopel M, Blais JG. Non-graphical solutions for Cattell’s scree test. Methodology. 2013;9(1):23-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000051
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Marketing. 2009;20:277-319.
Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;48(1):159-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46.
World Health Organization (WHO). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. [cited 2015 Sep 7] Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
Freire MHS, Arreguy-Sena C, Müller PCS. Cross-cultural adaptation and content and semantic validation of the Difficult Intravenous Access Score for pediatric use in Brazil. Rev Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2017;25; e2920. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1785.2920
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
