Effect analysis of environmental factors on the children’s Amazon community neuropsychomotor development

Authors

  • Ana Paula Pureza Pantoja Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA) – Belém (PA)
  • Givago da Silva Souza Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) – Belém (PA)
  • Erica Feio Carneiro Nunes Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA) – Belém (PA)
  • Lucieny da Silva Pontes Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA) – Belém (PA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152158

Keywords:

neuropsychomotor development, environment, family relationships, social vulnerability

Abstract

 

Introduction: The early years of a child’s life are marked by a significant development, as well as high sensitivity to environmental influences such as poverty, housing, quality and family structure. Thus, the identification of environmental risk factors and delayed neurodevelopment, coupled with early intervention, are essential for an healthy development.

Objective: To analyze the effect of environmental factors on the neuropsychomotor development of children in the Amazon community.

Methods: This is a quantitative and qualitative study of analytical and cross-sectional approach with 50 children between 24 and 36 months of age, of both sexes, living in an Amazonian community. Two types of the socio-economic-environmental questionnaire were used; a) Infant/Toddler (IT) HOME Inventory to analyze the quality of the family environment; b) the Denver Screening Test II for screening neurodevelopment. Also, a descriptive analysis was performed using a calculation of means and standard deviations.

Results: The study found that a significant majority of the children had normal neuropsychomotor development; however, children classified as delayed, the more significant impact variable in the development was the quality of the family environment, which in turn was influenced by the lower economic class, lack of water treatment, lack of electricity and external toilet.

Conclusion: Environmental factors were not significant on the neuropsychomotor development of the local children of the Amazon community.

  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Silva SSC, Santos TM, Pontes FAR, Maluschke JB. Avaliação de famílias Ribeirinhas: uma proposta adaptada ao contexto. Rev Interinstitucional Psicol. 2011;4(2):253-63.

2. Silva SSC, Pontes FAR, Santos TM, Maluschke JB, Mendes LSA, Reis CD, et al. Rotinas familiares de Ribeirinhos Amazônicos: uma possibilidade de investigação. Psicol Teor Pesq. 2010;26(2):341-50.

3. Walker SP, Chang SM, Vera-Hernández M, Grantham-McGregor S. Early childhood stimulation benefits adult competence and reduces violent. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):849-57.

4. Delvan JS, Becker APS, Braun K. Fatores de risco no desenvolvimento de crianças e a Resiliência: um estudo teórico. Rev Psicol IMED. 2010;2(1):349-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2175-5027/psico-imed.v2n1p349-357

5. Santos LM, Santos DN, Bastos ACS, Assis AMO, Prado MS, Barreto ML. Determinants of early cognitive development: hierarchical analysis of a longitudinal study. Cad Saúde Pública. 2008;24(2):427-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2008000200022

6. Dessen MA, Polonia AC. A família e a escola como contextos de desenvolvimento humano. Paidéia. 2007;17(36):21-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2007000100003

7. Kenney MK. Child, family, and neighborhood associations with parent and peer interactive play during early childhood. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(Suppl.1):S88-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-0998-7

8. Fernald LCH, Kariger P, Hidrobo M, Gertler PJ. Socioeconomic gradients in child development in very Young children: Evidence from India, Indonesia, Peru, and Senegal. PNAS. 2012;109(Suppl. 2):17273-80. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121241109

9. Fundo das Nações Unidas para a Infância (UNICEF - Brasil). Situação Mundial da Infância 2013: crianças com deficiência. [cited 2014 Jan 16] Available from: http://www.unicef.org/brazil/pt/PT_SOWC2013.pdf.

10. Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (PNUD). Ranking do IDH dos estados. [cited 2014 Feb 16] Available from: http://www.pnud.org.br/atlas/ranking/Ranking-IDHM-Municipios-2010.aspx. 11.

11. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Informações Estatísticas. Pará, Igarapé Miri, 2013. [cited 2014 Jan 16] Available from: http://cod.ibge.gov.br/236w1.

12. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério de classificação econômica Brasil, 2008. [cited 2014 Jan 16] Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.

13. Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Administration manual HOME observation for measurement of the enviroment. Arkansas: University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 1984.

14. Totsika V, Sylva K. The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child Adolesc Mental Health. 2004;9(1):25-35. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-357X.2003.00073.x

15. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):91-7.

16. Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (PNUD). Indicadores de desenvolvimento brasileiro 2001-2012. [cited 2014 Oct 14] Available from: http://aplicacoes.mds.gov.br/sagirmps/ferramentas/docs/IDB-portugues-final.pdf.

17. Milteer RM, Ginsburg KR. The Importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bond: focus on children in poverty. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):204-13.

18. Duncan GJ, Ziol-Guest KM, Kalil A. Early-Childhood poverty and adult attainment, behavior, and health. Child Dev. 2010;81(1):306-25. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01396.x

19. Morais RLS, Carvalho AM. Desenvolvimento cognitivo e motor de crianças nos primeiros anos de vida e qualidade do contexto ambiental: uma análise relacional. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: 2013.

20. Lamy Filho F, Medeiros SM, Lamy ZC, Moreira MEL. Ambiente domiciliar e alterações do desenvolvimento em crianças de comunidade da periferia de São Luís – MA. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16(10):4181-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011001100023

21. Silva DG, Pontes FAR, Silva SSC. Relações familiares de duas crianças ribeirinhas da Amazônia. Psicol Teor Prát. 2011;13(3):139-51.

22. Defilipo EC, Frônio JS, Teixeira MTB, Leite ICG, Bastos, RR, Vieira MT, et al. Oportunidades do ambiente domiciliar para o desenvolvimento motor. Rev Saúde Pública. 2012;46(4):633-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012005000040

23. González RR, Olea MF, Limón KMS, Sánchez C, Rosas HA. Experiencia de la aplicación y critérios para la interpretación de dos versiones del Inventario HOME para infantes de 0 a 3 años de vida. Salud Mental. 2010;33(1):57-66.

24. Avan BI, Raza AS, Kirkwood BR. A community-based study of early childhood sensory stimulation in home environment associated with growth and psychomotor development in Pakistan. Int J Public. 2014;59(5):779-88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0525-7

25. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Síntese de indicadores sociais uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. 2013. [cited 2014 Oct 14] Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge. gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv66777.pdf.

26. Lima AKP, Lima AO. Perfil do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor e aspectos familiares de crianças instucionalizadas na cidade do Recife. Rev CES Psicol. 2012;5(1):11-25.

27. Lourenço JMQ, Gusmão SRB. O desenvolvimento motor da criança urbana e ribeirinha do município de Belém - Pará na faixa etária de 0 a 1 ano. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade do Estado do Pará. Belém: 2004.

28. Guerreiro TBF, Hashimoto AS. Desenvolvimento de crianças Ribeirinhas das Ilhas ao Sul de Belém – Pará. Monografia (Conclusão de Curso) - Universidade do Estado do Pará. Belém: 2007.

29. Hanson JL, Chandra A, Wolfe BL, Pollak SD. Association between income and the hippocampus. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18712. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018712

30. Raizada RDS, Kishiyama MM. Effects of socioeconomic status on brain development, and how cognitive neuroscience may contribute to levelling the playing field. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4:3. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.003.2010

Downloads

Published

2018-11-28

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 3 (2018)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis