Maternal expectation and children's literacy achievement

Authors

  • Maria José de Mesquita Serra Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto de Psicologia
  • Jane Correa Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto de Psicologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19747

Keywords:

maternal expectation, literacy, children's writing

Abstract

This work examines the relationship between maternal expectation and the child's literacy achievement. A questionnaire consisting of seven texts produced in different moments of children's literacy experiences at school was presented to 45 mothers who should indicate how they desired and expected their children to be writing in the middle (July) and at the end (November) of the school year. On these two occasions, children's writing samples were collected. In July, children's performance was beyond their mothers' desire and expectation. In November, however, the number of children whose performance surpassed what their mothers expected and desired decreased. On the other hand, the percentage of children whose performance did not come up to their mothers' desire and expectation increased. In that case, the majority of children had mothers whose desire was beyond their expectation. The majority of children whose performance surprised their mothers were those whose mothers' desire and expectation coincided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Frago AV. Alfabetização na sociedade e na história: vozes, palavras e texto. Porto Alegre: ArtMed;1993.

Holden GW, Edwards LA. Parental attitudes towards child rearing: instruments, issues, and implications. Psychological Bulletin 1989;106(1):29-58.

Miller SA. Parent’s beliefs about children’s cognitive development. Child development 1988;59(2):259-85.

Okagaki L, Sternberg RJ. Parental beliefs and children’s school performance. Child Development. 1993; 64(1):36-56.

Goodnow JJ. Parent’s ideas, actions, and feelings: models and methods from developmental and social psychology. Child Development 1988;59(2):286-320.

Hunt JMcV, Paraskevopoulos J. Children’s psychological development as a function of the inaccuracy of their mothers’ knowledge of their abilities. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 1980;136(2):285-298.

Broussard ER, Hartner MS. Maternal perception of the neonate as related to development. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 1970; 1(1):16-25.

Moreno MC, Cubero R. Relações sociais nos anos pré-escolares: família, escola, colegas. In: Coll C, Palacios J, Marchesi A, organizadores. Desenvolvimento psicológico e educação. Porto Alegre: ArtMed; 1995. Cap.14: p.190-202.

Cubero R, Moreno MC. Relações sociais nos anos escolares: família, escola, colegas. In: CollC, Palacios J, Marchesi A, organizadores. Desenvolvimento psicológico e educação. Porto Alegre: ArtMed; 1995. Cap. 19: p.250-60.

Holloway S, Hess RD. Mothers’ and teachers’attributions about children’s mathematics performance. In: Sigel IE, editor. Parental belief systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates;1985. Cap. 7: p.177-99.

Briggs DC. A auto-estima do seu filho. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 2000.

Downloads

Published

2005-04-01

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2005)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis