Primiparous mothers' knowledge about child development: a study in Itajaí, SC

Authors

  • Anna K. Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia
  • Mauro L. Vieira Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Departamento de Psicologia
  • Maria L. Seidl de Moura Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Rodolfo C. Ribas Jr. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19766

Keywords:

Primiparous mothers, Child development, Socioeconomic context, Parental beliefs

Abstract

The central focus of this study was to evaluate primiparous mothers' knowledge about parenting and child development throughout the first year of life of their children. Participants were 109 primiparous mothers, aged 18 years or older, living in Itajaí (Santa Catarina), with a child aged 1-12 months. The KIDI (Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory) was employed to evaluate mothers' conceptions of infant development and the Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Socioeconomic Status was used to evaluate the socioeconomic level of mothers' and their families'. Through statistical analysis it was verified that mothers' educational attainment and occupation correlated significantly with their knowledge on parenting and child development. The study revealed that mothers had more knowledge about parenting (beliefs, strategies and practices of the parents) when compared with other types of knowledge. The study concluded that the mothers' socioeconomic level is an important factor related to their knowledge about the child development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ribas Jr RC. Cognições de mães brasileiras acerca da maternidade, da paternidade e do desenvolvimento humano: uma contribuição ao estudo da psicologia parental [Tese]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Social da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2004.

Sigel IE, McGillicuddy-Delisi AV. Parent beliefs are cognitions: the dynamic belief systems model. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbook of parenting. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. p. 485-508.

Ribas Jr RC, Seidl de Moura ML, Bornstein MH. Socioeconomic status in brazilian psychological research: socioeconomic status and parenting knowledge. Estud Psicol (Natal). 2003;8(3):385-92.

United Nations. Convention on the rights of the child. New York; 1989.

Schwartz SH, Bilsky W. Toward a psychological structure of human values. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;53:550-62.

Goodnow JJ. Parents’ ideas, actions and feelings, models and methods from developmental and social psychology. Child Dev. 1988;59:286-320.

Bornstein MH, Hahn CS, Suwalsky JTD, HaynesOM. The Hollingshead four-factor index of social status and the socioeconomic index of occupations. In: Bornstein MH, Bradley RH, editors. Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 29-81.

Angelillo I, Ricciardi G, Rossi P, Pantisano P, Langiano E, Pavia M. Mothers and vaccination: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour in Italy. BullWorld Health Organ. 1999;77(3):224-9.

Russell KM, Champion VL. Health beliefs and social influence in home safety practices of mothers with preschool children. Image J Nurs Sch.1996;28(1):59-64.

Williams PD, Williams AR, Lopez M, Tayko NP. Mothers’ developmental expectations for young children in the Philippines. Int J Nurs Stud.2000;37(4):291-301.

Ninio A. The naive theory of the infant and other maternal attitudes in two groups in Israel. Child Dev. 1979;50(4):976-80.

Sluckin W, Sluckin A, Herbert M. Vínculo materno. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 1990.

Benasich AA, Brooks-Gunn J. Maternal attitudes and knowledge of child-rearing, associations with family and child outcomes. Child Dev.1996;67(3):1186-205.

Seidl de Moura ML. Interações iniciais e seu papel no desenvolvimento: uma contribuição ao estudo da gênese da atividade mediada [Tese de Livre Docência]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Universidade do Rio de Janeiro; 1999.

Jacobs JE, Eccles JS. The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. J Pers Soc Psychol.1992;63(6):932-44.

Harkness S, Super CM. Parental ethno theories inaction. In: Sigel IE, McGillicuddy-Delisi AV, Goodnow JJ, editors. Parental belief systems, the psychological consequences for children. 2ª ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1992. p. 373-91.

Harkness S, Super CM. The developmental niche: a theoretical framework for analyzing the hou-sehold production of health. Soc Sci Med.1994;38(2):217-26.

Prado AB. Semelhanças e diferenças entre homens e mulheres na compreensão do comportamento paterno [Dissertação]. Florianópolis (SC):Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2005.

Downloads

Published

2005-12-01

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2005)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis