Single session work: single intervention with the family and adolescent in conflict with the law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19852Keywords:
Socioeducative measure, Adolescent in conflict with the law, Family evaluation, Juridical psychology, Single session workAbstract
This article aims at presenting and discussing a methodology for family evaluation in a perspective of the Single Session Work which is based on a single intervention and is destined to attend the adolescent in conflict with the law. Family evaluation comprised the following objectives: to raise psychosocial information that could enable a better understanding of the characteristics of the clientele; to understand the family paradigm, identifying the elements related to the emergence of the present crisis, understanding by crisis the involvement of the adolescent with Justice; to encourage the families to establish new paradigms, capable of responding to the crisis. We believe that this methodology can be useful in the judicial context with this population of adolescents who are under socioeducative measures and do not present demands for change. We recognize the method's potential to generate information, to rescue parental bonds and to signify the delinquent act, once it is a punctual critical intervention which reactivates the potentialities and the creativity both of the family and of the technical team.References
Sudbrack MFO, Conceição MIG, Seidl EMF, Silva MT. Adolescentes e drogas no contexto da Justiça. Brasília: Plano; 2003.
White M. Guias para una terapia familiar sistemica. Buenos Aires: Gedisa; 1997.
Omer H. Autoridade sem violência. O resgate da voz dos pais. Belo Horizonte: ArteSã; 2002.
Minuchin S. Famílias: funcionamento e tratamento. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1990.
Fishman HC. Tratamiento de adolescentes com problemas. Um enfoque de terapia familiar. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 1989.
Stanton MD, Todd F. Terapia familiar del abusoy adiccion a las drogas. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 1988.
Vasconcellos MJE. Pensamento sistêmico. O novo paradigma da ciência. São Paulo: Papirus/UFMG; 2002.
Boscolo L, Cecchin G, Hoffman L, Penn P. Aterapia familiar sistêmica de Milão. Conversações sobre teoria e prática. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1993.
Guimarães FL. “O problema é que esse garoto, desde pequeno...” Construções narrativas acerca do adolescente no contexto de terapia familiar [dissertação]. Brasília (DF): Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília; 2001.
Vasconcellos MJE. Implicações do“Pensamento sistêmico novo-paradigmático”: a questão da dicotomia “terapia familiar sistêmica”/ “terapia familiar narrativista”. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica 2004;13(24):7-13.
Cabié MC. Adolescência e ciclo familiar existencial. In: Gammer C, Cabié MC. Adolescência e crise familiar. Lisboa: Climepsi;1999.
Sudbrack MFO. O enfoque sistêmico aplicado à delinqüência e ao contexto jurídico. Família – Temas de Terapia Familiar e Ciências Sociais. 1992;5(1):29-42.
Bucher JSNF. Lei, transgressões, famílias e instituições: elementos para uma reflexão sistêmica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 1992;8(suplemento):475-83.
Ausloos G. Adolescence, délinquence et famille. Annales de Vaucresson 1997;14: 80-87.
Olivenstein C. A clínica do toxicômano: a faltada falta. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1985.
Sudbrack MFO. Da falta do pai à busca da lei: o significado da passagem ao ato delinquente no contexto familiar e institucional. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 1992; 8(suplemento):447-57.
Penso MA. Dinâmicas familiares e construções identitárias de adolescentes envolvidos em atos infracionais e com drogas [tese]. Brasília(DF): Universidade de Brasília; 2003.
Schnitman DS, Fuks S. Paradigma y crisis: entre el riesgo y la posibilidad. Sistemas Familiares. 1993;9(3):33-44.
Carter B, MacGoldrick M, organizadores. As mudanças no ciclo de vida familiar – uma estrutura para a terapia familiar. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.
Neuburger R. L‘autre demande. Psychanalyseet thérapie familiale systémique. Paris: ESF; 1984.
Gergen KJ. La construcción social: emergência y potencial. In: Pakman M, organizador. Construcciones de la experiencia humana. 1996;Vol.1,Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa;
Marcelli D, Braconnier A. Manual de psicopatologia do adolescente. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1989.
Ausloos G. A competência das famílias: tempo, caos, processo. Lisboa: Climepsi; 1996.
Omer H. Intervenções críticas em psicoterapia: do impasse ao início da mudança. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1997.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
