The teachers' discourse on pediculosis transmission before an educational activity

Authors

  • Pércide Verônica da Silva Cunha FIOCRUZ; Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; Laboratório de Educação em Ambiente e Saúde
  • Zeneida Teixeira Pinto FIOCRUZ; Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; Laboratório de Educação em Ambiente e Saúde
  • Edson Ferreira Liberal Hospital Universitário Gaffrée Guinle; Serviço de Pediatria
  • Júlio Vianna Barbosa FIOCRUZ; Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; Laboratório de Educação em Ambiente e Saúde

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19892

Keywords:

Pediculosis, transmission, health education, Discourse of the Collective Subject

Abstract

Pediculosis is a public health pathology. Educational methods would certainly colaborate to the success of the treatment and prevention of this pathology. This study, developed in Rio de Janeiro's schools (RJ), Brazil, demonstrates the primary teachers' discourse on how pediculosis is transmitted. The pieces of information were obtained from interviews and analized by the Discourse of the Collective Subject method. Fourteen categories were revealed. Some correct ways of transmission were presented, for example: through physical and corporal contact, like "head to head", with people who have pediculosis. On the other hand, some of these categories revealed lack of knowledge about the subject: the lice fly; the lice jump from one's head to anothers'; through the nits. These results demonstrated that there are teachers that don't know about the transmission of this pathology. For this reason, the possibility that these teachers have to collaborate effectively to its prevention in schools diminishes; the same occurs with the health promotion of their students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khokhar A. A study of Pediculosis capitis among primary school children in Delhi. Ind. J. Med. Sciences. 2002;56(9):449-452.

Counahan M, Andrews R, Büttner P, Bymes G, Speare R. Head lice prevalence in primary schools in Victoria, Australia. J. Paediatr. Child. Health. 2004; 40:616-19.

Kokturk A, Baz K, Bugdayci R, SasmazT, Tursen U, Kaya TI, et al. The prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in schoolchildren in Mersin, Turkey. Int J Dermatology.2003; 42:694-98.

Borges R, Mendes J. Epidemiological aspects of head lice in children attending day care centers, urban and rural schoolsin Uberlândia, central Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2002; 97(2):189-92.

Barbosa JV; Pinto ZT. Pediculose no Brasil. Entomol. Vect. 2003; 10(4):579-86.

Price JH, Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG, Islam R. School nurses’ perceptions of and experience with head lice. J. Sch. Health. 1999; 69(4):153-58.

Ressel GW. AAP releases clinical report on head lice. Am. Fam. Physician. 2003;67(6):1391-92.

Rupes V, Moravec J, Chmela J, Ledvinka J, Zelenková J. A resistance of head lice (Pediculus capitis) toper methrin in Czech Republic. Centr. Eur. J. Publ. Hlth. 1995; 3(1):30-2.

Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Harvey I,Coles GC. Evidence for double resistence to permethrin and malathion in head lice. British Journal of Dermatology 1999; 141: 508-511.

Meinking TL, Serrano L, Hard B, Entze lP, Lemard G, Riviera E, Villar ME. Comparative in vitro pediculicidal efficacy of treatments in a resistant headline population in the United States. Arch Dermatol. 2002; 138:220-4.

Hunter JA, Barker SC. Susceptibility of head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) tope diculicides in Australia. Parasitol. Res. 2003; 90:476-78.

Pollack RJ, Kiszewshi AE, Spielman A. Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestation in North America. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2000; 19(8):689-94.

Pearlman DL. A simple treatment for headline: dry-on, suffocation-based pediculicide. Pediatrics. 2004; 114:275-79.

Lefèvre F, Lefèvre AMC. O Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo: um novo enfoque em pesquisa qualitativa (Desdobramentos). Caxias do Sul: EDUCS, 2003.

Burgess I. The life of a head louse. Nursing Times. 2002; 98(46):54.

Heukelbach J, Feldmeier H. Ectoparasites – the underestimated realm. The Lancet. 2004; 363:889-91.

Ibarra J, Hall DM. Head Lice in schoolchildren. Arch. Dis. Child. 1998;78:288.

Chunge RN, Scott FE, Underwood JE, Zavarella KJ. A pilot study to indicate transmission of head lice. Canadian J Public Health 1991; 82:207-8.

Burgess IF. Human Lice and their control. Annu. Ver. Entomol. 2004;49:457-81.

Burgess IF. Human Lice and their management. Advances in Parasitology.1995; 32:271-342.

Speare R, Cahill C, Thomas G. Head Lice on pillows, and strategies to make a small risk even less. Int. J. Dermatol.2003; 42:626-29.

Burkhart CN. Fomite transmission withhead lice: a continuing controversy. Lancet. 2003; 361:99-100.

Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB. Creches e Doenças Transmissíveis. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB. Nelson. Tratado de Pediatria.17ª.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2005.v.1. p.1266-1269.

Roberts RJ. Head Lice. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346(21):1645-50.

Speare R, Thomas G, Cahill C. Head lice are not found on floors in primary school classrooms. Australian and New Zealand J Public Health. 2002;26(3):208-11.

Hootman J. Quality Improvement projects Related to Pediculosis Management. J School Nursing. 2002; 18(2):80-86.

Borges R, Mendes J, Valladares BLB. Invasores da Cabeleira. Ciência Hoje das Crianças 2003; 16(34):2-5.

Lopes Neto AA. Bullying –comportamento agressivo entre estudantes. Jornal de Pediatria. 2005; 81Supl 5:S164-S172.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-01

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2008)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis