The social matter in contemporary france: a survey experience

Authors

  • Fabiola Zioni Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública; Departamento de Prática em Saúde Pública

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19915

Keywords:

violence, young population, school, immigration, urban problems, popular conjoined

Abstract

France went over urban conflicts in its own popular quarters. Occurrences with the police sealed by the death of a resident, generally young or adolescent, are followed by violent public manifestations: strokes, car incendiary fire and/or on public and private settlements, police confrontments. In the conflicts at French "banlieue" can be apprehended common elements to the English and/or American events of other decades. OBJECTIVE: consists in identify the perception and the residents representations about their life and health conditions in France. METHOD: qualitative inquiry through in Les Aubiers, popular quarter in Bordeaux, at the years 2002 and 2005. The resident population in the quarter is composed mainly of immigrants or French foreigners, proceeding from different localities: North Africa, Sub Saharian Africa, Turkey, Portugal, Reunion. The social and economic indicators present significantly lower levels than the others Bordeaux quarters, following the dispositions found in others "banlieues". Among these indicators, the unemployment rate, mainly among youth, is alarming (40%). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: the social politics should turn more to the individual direction than to the territory, as it only will be transformed by the former one and not the contrary. A quarter and a population stigmatized are contemplated with an extensive social policy. Although liable to criticism, one may not disregard the existence of systematical integration efforts, nor the existence of social policies. If they are inadequate, it is about enlarging the space of discussion in order to reform it. It is about knowing which is the disposition of contemporary societies, as a whole, to fight against the iniquities and segregations.

References

Lapeyronnie D. La question social e adjourn ́hui. Département de Sociologie, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux 2,2006.

Jacquemin H. Les risques des quartiers sensisbles. Le cas de Les Aubiers, Consultado em abril de 2005,M@ppemonde77(2005.1)http:mappemonde,mgm.fr/num5/article/p5107.html

Caze S. La conduite de projet dans lesquartiers de grands ensembles, Etude du Quartier d’Habitat du Lac – Bordeaux, Mémoire de DESS d’Urbanismeoperationnel Ville en projet , Directeurde mémoire : Agnès Berland – Berthon,Institut De Tourisme et Urbanisme,Université Michel de Montaigne,Bordeaux, 2001.

Kovarick L. Sobre vulnerabilidade sociale civil: Estados Unidos, França e Brasil,Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais,vol18, n.51, São Paulo, Fevereiro- 2003.

Genestier P. Quel est le futur pour lesgrands ensembles in JOEl, R. Ville, exclusion et citoyenneté- entretiens de laville, Paris, Seuil, 1992.

Avenel C. Sociologie ds quartierssensibles, Paris, Armand Colin, 2004.

Paugam S. Les formes elémentaires de lapauvreté – Le lien social, Paris, PUF, 2005.

D ́allondans AG. L’exclusion sociale: lesmétamorphoses d ́un concept -1960-2000, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2003.

Genestier P. Quel est le futur pour lesgrands ensembles in JOEl, R. Ville, exclusion et citoyenneté- entretiens de laville, Paris, Seuil, 1992.

Costa-Lacoux. L’immigration : l’exil inPaugam S. L’éclusion: l’état des savoir, Paris, La Découvere, 1996.

Weil P. La Réplublique et sa diversité, Paris, La Réblubique des Idées – Seuil, 2005.

Wieviorka M. 1996 – La France Raciste(org.), Paris, Ponte-seuil,1996.

Villechaise-Dupont A. Amère banlieue –les gens des grands ensembles, Paris, Bernard Grasset, 2000.

Lapeyronnie D.Guetto urbain –ségregation, violence, pauvreté en Franceaujourd’hui, Paris, robert Laffont,2009.

Lapeyronnie D. La question socialeaujourd’hui, Département de Sociologie, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux,2000.

Maurin E. Le guetto français, Paris, Editions Seul set La republique desidées, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2009-08-01

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2009)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis