In the name of reason: When art makes history
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19941Keywords:
psychiatric reform, psychiatrics hospitais, deinstitutionalization, historyAbstract
The article presents the documentary "Em nome da razão" (In the name of reason), directed by Helvécio Ratton, filmmaker born in Minas Gerais, produced by the "Grupo Novo de Cinema e Tv" (The New Group of Cinema e Tv) and by the Associação Mineira de Saúde Mental (Minas Gerais's Mental Health Association). The photography is by Diliny Campos and it was edited by José Tavares Barro. The text was written by the psychiatrist Antonio Simone. It shows the tragedy lived by the thousands of patients at the Hospital Colônia, in Barbacena, Minas Gerais, that reflected the national scenario around the year of 1979. It was an essential milestone of the fight for the political reform of mental health in Brazil and promoted discussions and mobilization of public opinion concerning the need of some urgent transformation. Helvécio Ratton's documentary caused a big crack in the symbolic system of the Brazilian psychiatric public institutions. The film promoted historical events that confronted the mental hospitais and defied the limits of psychiatric rationality.Downloads
References
Goulart MSB. A construção da mudança nas instituições sociais: a Reforma Psiquiátrica. Pesquisas e Práticas Psicossociais. 2006;1(1).
Goulart MSB. As raízes italianas do movimento antimanicomial. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 2007.
Firmino, Hiram. Nos porões da loucura. Rio de Janeiro: CODECRI, 1982.
Rodrigues HBC. “Sejamos realistas, tentemos o impossível”: desencaminhando a psicologia através da Análise institucional. In: Jacob-Vilela A, Ferreira AA. Leal, Portugal FT. História da Psicologia -rumos e percursos. Rio de Janeiro: NAU, 2005.
Amarante P. (Coord). Loucos pela vida: a trajetória da reforma psiquiátrica no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 1998.
Ratton H. Em nome da razão [CD]. Belo Horizonte: Quimera filmes; 2009.
Carvalho JD. Helvécio Ratton e o cinema brasileiro. Fénix Revista de História e Estudos Culturais. 2008;5(4).
Barreto PF. Evolução do Conceito de Assistência Psiquiátrica. Rev Bras Psiquiatria. 1971;(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis