Pathologization of the youngster author of infractional act and the emergence of "new" judicial asylums
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19944Keywords:
psychiatry, total hazard, internal hazard, external hazardAbstract
This study focuses the growing evidence of cases of psychiatric solution directed to perpetrators of lawbreakers, especially in the state of São Paulo, which culminate in the construction of an Experimental Health Unit, a joint venture between the Departments of Health, Justice and Corrections, in order to provide care to infraction authors with diagnosis of personality disorder and/or dangerous for the fulfillment of socio-educational measures for admission to the restraint. Some of the force lines which are originated from this construction are examined, in particular the renewed use of the notion of danger that takes on overtones that make easy the extension and the the spread of its use, increasingly subject to demands for "social protection". This study highlights how the composition of the infraction with mental disorder buildes arguments for changes to the Child and Adolescent Statute (ECA) and for the production of practices directed to the author of offenses that are diametrically opposed to the paradigms of the ECA and the current national policy on mental health. Finally, the text proposes, in view of the Mental Health Reform, some possibilities for thinking and acting differently, questioning the therapeutic guidelines tied to a logic of individualism, which suggests the necessity to enhance the view and action for the complex and often restricted plot in which these young people fall socially, investing in clinical practice in its ethical dimension and not as a place of control, supervision or discipline from life.Downloads
References
Vicentin MCG. A vida em rebelião. Jovens em conflito com a lei. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2005a.
Vicentin MCG. A questão da responsabilidade penal juvenil: notas para uma perspectiva ético-política. In: ABMP; Ilanud, Secretaria Especial de Direitos Humanos (Orgs.). Justiça, Adolescente e Ato infracional: sócio educação e responsabilização. São Paulo: Ilanud,2006.
Vicentin MCG. “Interfaces psi-jurídicas: a psiquiatrização do adolescente em conflito com a lei”. Relatório final de pesquisa. Comissão de Ensino e Pesquisa, PUC/SP, 2005.
Vicentin MCG, Rosa MD. Transtorno mental e criminalidade na adolescência: notas para uma análise crítica da patologização do adolescente autor de ato infracional. Rev Bras Ciências Criminais. 2009;17(78):320-347.
Bentes ALS. Tudo como dantes no quartel d’Abrantes: estudo das internações psiquiátricas de crianças e adolescentes através de encaminhamento judicial. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Osvaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 1999.
Joia, J. A interface psi-jurídica: estudo dinternações de adolescentes por determinação judicial no Hospital Psiquiátrico Pinel. Relatório final de pesquisa de Iniciação Científica. CEPE/PUC/SP, 2006.
Frasseto F. A Unidade Experimental de Saúde – mais um triste capítulo da história paulista no tratamento de jovens infratores. São Paulo: Mimeo, 2008.
Foucault M. Microfísica do poder. 7ª ed. Trad. e org. Roberto Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1988.
Scisleski ACC, Maraschin C, Silva RNA. Manicômio em circuito: os percursos dos jovens e a internação psiquiátrica. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2008;24(2):342-352.
Guemureman S, Daroqui A. La ninêza justiciada. Buenos Aires, Ed. Del Puerto: 2001.
Sarti CA. A saúde mental na ‘nova Febem’. Projeto Quixote. Relatório interno de trabalho apresentado à Febem. São Paulo: Departamento de Psiquiatria da Unifesp; 2000.
Leonardis O. Estatuto y figuras de lapeligrosidad social. Entre psiquiatríar e formada y sistema penal: notas sociológicas. Rev Ciencias Penales. 1998;(4): 429-449.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Coordenação Geral de Saúde Mental. Reforma psiquiátrica e política de saúde mental no Brasil. Documento apresentado à Conferência Regional de Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde Mental. Brasília: 2005.
Basaglia F. Escritos selecionados em saúde mental e reforma psiquiátrica. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2005.
Pitch T. Responsabilidades limitadas. Actores, conflictos y justicia penal. Buenos Aires, Ad Hoc, 2003.
Zaffaroni ER. Criminología: Aproximación desde un margen. Bogotá: Temis, 2003.
GramkowG, Vicentin MCG. Política de Saúde Mental para a juventude: o direito à saúde? (Paper para CONPSI, 2009.
Kolker T. Instituições totais no século XXI. In: Menegat M, Neri R. (Orgs.).Criminologia e Subjetividade. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2005; p.109-121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis