Itinerary for deconstruction of the forensic psychiatric institute of Rio Grande do Sul

Authors

  • Claudemir José Ceolin Missaggia Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19952

Keywords:

criminal law, psychiatry, law enforcement

Abstract

This study aims to describe the experience of psychiatric reforms, measures of humanization and measures of deinstitutionalization. The first psychiatric reform was the idea of the recovery throutgh work. But over time, these colonies showed the same as traditional asylums. The way the Brazilian Penal Code regulates the subject is very easy to violate the principle of proportionality in that the perpetrator of a robbery and bodily injury, for example, may be deprived of his/her liberty (or have his freedom restricted) for an equal or greater sentence than the author of a murder, a robbery or a rape. To the extent I was enacting the extinctions of the security measures I realized that, by their large numbers could not be borne only of the Forensic Psychiatric Institute. I decided to request officially the authorities to receive patients from the Forensic Psychiatric Institute of the State. Officers of the Governor, the Human Rights Commissions of the Legislative Assembly and OAB / RS, the health authority and state and municipal prosecutor for the Defense of Human Rights and Citizenship prosecutors, etc. Finally, I leave one last message. Especially, we judges, shall call a right to be as ethical category and not just scientific category, the true and beautiful words of BALLESTEROS "the protection of others against my possible defections" and, as highlighted by this author, now in this true and beautiful words, the judiciary should not and cannot sacrifice the law on the altar of power and state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amarante P. Saúde mental e Atenção Psicossocial. Rio de Janeiro, Fiocruz, 2007.

Foucault M. Microfísica do Poder. 24ª Edição. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal,1979.

Basaglia F. A Instituição Negada. 3ª edição. Tradução de Heloisa Jahn. Graal, Rio de Janeiro: 2001.

Gomes LF. Duração das Medidas de Segurança. Revista dos Tribunais.

Castel R. A Gestão dos Riscos. Da Antipsiquiatria à Pós-Psicanalise. Tradução Celina Luz. Rio de Janeiro, 1987.

Goffmann E. Manicômios, Prisões e Conventos. Tradução Dante Moreira Leite. São Paulo, Perspectiva, 2007.

Hegglin MF. Los Enfermos Mentales em el Derecho Penal. Buenos Aires, Editores Del Puerto, 2006.

Barros DD. Psiquiatria Social e Reforma Psiquiátrica. Paulo Amarante(org.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz,1994.

Dias JF. Direito Penal Português. As Consequências Jurídicas do Crime. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

Rotelli F. A Instituição Inventada. In: Desinstitucionalização. Nicácio F, org.) 2 ed. Editora Hucitec. São Paulo, 2001.

Neves AC. Escritos acerca do Direito, do Pensamento Jurídico, da sua Metodologia e Outros. V. 2.Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2010-04-01

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2010)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis