The discourse of the collective subject as an i extended: proposal illustrated by a research about the morning after pill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19988Keywords:
morning after pill, pregnancy, adolescenceAbstract
In this study we discuss the use of the technique of the Collective Subject Discourse (CSD) as a possibility to overcome some shortcomings of stalemates and traditional opinion. The purpose of the Collective Subject Discourse is to introduce the integrity of the review, in order to recover the collective scale, as essentially discursive variable, which is called the collective singular first person, which configures the view as an expression of"self extended". Hence, to do a community think through empirical research in order to know the collective opinion expressed directly, it will always be necessary to resolve problems of collective opinion that must necessarily be rebuilt, since from a perspective strictly positivist, only the separate opinion seems to exist. We conclude with the idea that the collective thought is a reference described by CSO and analyzed by meta-theoretical discourse.References
Gil AC. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
Diniewcs AM. Metodologia de pesquisa em saúde para iniciantes. São Caetano do Sul: Difusão Editora, 2007.
Vieira MMF, Zouain DM. Pesquisa qualitativa em administração. Teoria e prática. São Paulo: FGV Editora, 2005.
Poupart J et Al. A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos.
Batista MN. Campos DC. Metodologias de pesquisa em ciências. Analises quantitativa e qualitativa.
Bourdieu P. Os usos sociais de ciência. Por uma sociologia do campo cientifico. São Paulo: Editora Unesp 2004.
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC, Teixeira JJV. O discurso do sujeito coletivo. Caxias doSul: Educs, 2000.
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC. O discurso do sujeito coletivo. Desdobramentos. Caxias do Sul: Educs, 2003.
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC. Depoimentos e Discursos. Brasília: Liberlivro, 2005.
Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, 2ª ed. Chicago University Press, 1972.
Figueira SMA. Jesus, o médico dos médicos, a cura no pentecostalismo segundo usuários de um Serviço Local de Saúde. [dissertação]. São Paulo, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP, 1996.
Peirce CS. Semiótica e filosofia. S.P. Cultrix/Edusp, 1975.
Jodelet D. Representations Sociales: undo Maine en expansion. In Jodelet., D.(org). Les Représentations Sociales, Pa-ris, PUF, 1989.
Laplantine F. Anthropologie des systèmesde représentation de la maladie: deque quês exerces menées dans la France contemporaine reexamines à lalumière de l’expérience brésilienne. In Jodelelt, D. (org) Les Représentations Sociales, Paris, PUF, 1989.
Moscovici S. A representação social da psicanálise. R.J. Zahar, 1978.
Moscovici S. The phenomenon of social representation. In Farr, RM; Moscovici, S. Social Representations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1984.
Ferraz EA, Ferreira IQ. Início da atividade sexual e características da população adolescente que engravida. In: Seminário Gravidez na Adolescência; 1998; Rio de Janeiro. p. 47-54.
Santos Junior JD. Fatores etiológicos relacionados à gravidez na adolescência: vulnerabilidade à maternidade. In: Shcor N, Mota MSFT, Branco VC, organizadores. Cadernos juventude, saúde e desenvolvimento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 1999. p. 223-29.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Anticoncepção de Emergência. Perguntas e respostas para profissionais de saúde. Brasília, DF. 2005.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Marco teórico e referencial. Saúde sexual e saúde reprodutiva de adolscentes e jovens. Brasília, DF. 2006.
Lipovetsky G. A felicidade paradoxal. Ensaio sobre a sociedade do hiper consumo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2007.
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC, Ignarra RM. O conhecimento de intersecção. São Paulo: FSP/IPDSC, 2007.
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC. Os três sujeitos do diálogo intradiscursivo nas pesquisas sociais de atribuição de sentido: consequências para a avaliação. RECIIS – R. Eletr. de Com. Inf. Inov. Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, v.4, n.2, 2010.
Bauman Z. A sociedade individualizada. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2008.
Bauman Z. O mal estar da pós-modernidade. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Ed, 1998.
Bauman Z. Globalização. As consequências humanas. Rio de Janeiro : Jorge Zahar Ed.,1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
