The interference of asthma in children's everyday

Authors

  • Marisa Augusta Trinca Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública
  • Isabel M. P. Bicudo Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública; Departamento de Prática
  • Maria Cecília F. Pelicioni Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública; Departamento de Prática

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19997

Keywords:

Asthma, health promotion, social representation, child, school, quality of life, quotidian

Abstract

Asthma afflicts a great number of children in our society which makes it a significant childhood disease. The present study aims at investigating the disruption caused in the children's daily lives by asthma as well as identifying the way the disease is represented by the children and their parents. A qualitative methodology, based on the verbal discourse of the subjects, was chosen to identify the social representation of the pathology. Interviews on the disease were conducted with 45 school children, enrolled in the public schools of São Paulo, together with their parents and/or guardians. Social representations of asthma by this population were identified, using the Collective Subject Discourse Method. The results of the research showed enough knowledge, on the part of the subjects, of the interference of asthma in their children's daily lives, helping them to face the negative effects and elaborate strategies to improve their health and quality of life. Once these issues are known and understood, they provide warnings to the medical team responsible for the asthmatic child, due to the intrinsic nature between the representations of the disease built by the asthmatic child and his parents and the way he feels and interacts with the world around him and the society to which he belongs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borba RIH de, Sarti CA. A asma infantil eo mundo social e familiar da criança. Rev Bras Alergia Imunopatol. 2005; 28(5):249-254.

Bosi DR. A criança asmática na família: estudo de uma representaçäo. [dissertação de mestrado] São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP; 1998.

III Consenso Brasileiro no Manejo da Asma. J Pneumol. 2002; 28 supl1:S6-S51.

Fiks IN. Asma no esporte: não deixe a asma atrapalhar sua vida. São Paulo: Claridade; 2008.

IV Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Manejo da Asma. J Bras Pneumol. 2006; 32supl7:S447-S474.

Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Assistência à Saúde. Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas: asma grave. Brasília(DF); 2002 [acesso em 26 jul2010] Disponível em: http://portal.saude.gov.br/saude/visualizar_texto.cfm?idtxt=23509.

Barnes PJ, Godfrey S, Naspitz CK. Asma. sl: Cayfosa; 1997.

Casagrande RRD, Pastorino AC, Souza RGL, Leone C, Solé D, Jacob CMA. Prevalência de asma e fatores de risco em escolares da cidade de São Paulo. Rev Saúde Pública. 2008; 42(3):517-523.

Wijesinghe M, Weatherall M, Perrin K, Crane J, Beasley R. International trends in asthma mortality rates in the 5 to 34 year age group. Chest. 2009; 135(4):1045-1049.

Solé D. International Study for Asthma and Allergies in Childwood (ISAAC): o que nos ensinou? J Bras Pneumol. 2005;31(2):93-94.

Solé D, Wandalsen GF, Camelo-Nunes IC, Naspitz CK; ISAAC-Grupo Brasileiro. Prevalência de sintomas de asma, rinite e eczema atópico entre crianças e adolescentes brasileiros identificados pelo International Study for Asthma and Allergies in Childwood (ISAAC) – Fase3. J Pediatr. 2006; 82(5):341-346.

Zorzetto R, Moura M. Variações sobre um tema sufocante. Rev Pesq Fapesp. 2009;(165):17-21.

Fiks IN. Asma: superando mitos e medos. São Paulo: Claridade; 2004.

Solé D, Naspitz CK. Epidemiologia da asma: estudo ISAAC (International Study for Asthma and Allergies in Childwood).Rev Bras Alerg Imunopatol. 1998;21(2):38-45.

Matos APS, Machado ACC. Influência das variáveis biopsicossociais na qualidade devida em asmáticos. Psicol Teor Pesq. 2007;23(2): 139-148.

Campos HS, Lemos ACM. A asma e a DPOC na visão do pneumologista. J Bras Pneumol. 2009; 35(4):301-309.

Campos HS. O ABC da asma. J Bras Med.2007; 93(5/6):10-24.

Mello-da-Silva CA, Fruchtengarten L. Riscos químicos ambientais à saúde da criança. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005; 81(5 supl):S205 - S211.

Guevara JP, Wolf FM, Grum CM, Clark NM. Effects of educational interventions for self management of asthma in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003; 326 (7402):1308-9.

Clark NM et al. Developing education forchildren with asthma through study of self- management behavior. Helth Educ Quart.1980; 7: 278-297.

Teiramaa E. Psychosocial and psychicfactors in the course of asthma. J Psychos Res. 1978; 22(2):121-125.

Bosi DR, Reis AOA. A criança asmática na família: estudo de uma representaçäo. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2000; 10(2):60-76.

Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 10. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2007.

Moscovici SA. Representação social da psicanálise. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1978.

Moscovici SA. Representações sociais: investigação em psicologia social. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2003.

Lefèvre F, Lefèvre AMC. Depoimentos e discursos: uma proposta de análise em pesquisa social. Brasília(DF): Liber Livro Editora; 2005.

Qualiquantisoft [software na internet].SPI-Sales &Pascoal Informática. São Paulo; 2007. Disponível em: http//www.spi_net.com.br.

Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde. Projeto Promoção da Saúde. As cartas da promoção da saúde. Brasília(DF); 2002 (Série B. Textos Básicos em Saúde).

Downloads

Published

2011-04-01

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2011)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis