Prevalence of breastfeeding in brazil according to socioeconomic and demographics conditions

Authors

  • Daniela Wenzel Município de São Paulo; Secretaria de Educação; Departamento de Merenda Escolar
  • Sônia Buongermino de Souza Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública; Departamento de Nutrição

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.20013

Keywords:

breastfeeding, prevalence, socioeconomic indicators

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to quantify the prevalence of breastfeeding in Brazil, macroregions, urban and rural areas, according to socioeconomic and demographic conditions. METHODS: the sample consisted of 2,958 Brazilian children from 0 to 1 year old. Data are from the Search Family Budgets, 2002-2003. Contingency tables, the chi-square test and trend test were used in order to verify the relationship between variables, significance was set at 5% and prevalence curves of breastfeeeding were made. RESULTS: the medians of brestfeeding (BF) duration were 8 months for the North region, 9 months for Northeast, Southeast, and South and 10 months for Midwest. In the group 0 to 6 months, the frequency of BF in Brazil was 58%. We found 63%, 59%, 51%, 61% and 56%, respectively, for North, Northeast, Southeast, South and the Midwest. In the rural area we found 60% and 58% in urban area. Mothers with higher incomes and more education had 60% and 65%, respectively. In the group 7 to 12 months the prevalence in Brazil was 35%. We found: 44%, 34%, 37%, 34%, 28%, respectively, for North, Northeast, Southeast, South and the Midwest. In the rural area we reported 39% and 34% for urban area. Mothers with lower incomes and less education had 38% and 40% of BF frequency, respectively. CONCLUSION: the greatest prevalence was found in North and Northeast region and the greatest median of BF was found in Midwest region. The BF patterns differed in two age groups. In the group 0-6 months, mothers with higher income and more education had higher frequency of BF. However, in the group of children from 7 to 12 months, the prevalence of BF was higher among mothers with lower income and less education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araújo MFM, Del Fiaco A. Pimentel LS. Et al. Custo e economia da prática do aleitamento materno para a família. Rev. Bras. Saúde Materno Infant. 2004; 4(2): 135-141.

Ergenekon-Ozelci P, Elmaci N, Ertem M, Saka G. Breastfeeding beliefs and practices among migrant mothers in slums of Diyarbakir, Turkey 2001. Eur J Public Health. 2006; 16(2):143-8.

Kries RV, Koletzko B, Sauerwald T, Mutius EV, Barnert D, Veit Grunert, et al. Breast feeding and obesity: cross sectionalstudy. BMJ. 1999; 319: 147-150.

Toschke AM, Thorsteinsdottir KH, Kries RV. Meal frequency, breakfast consumption and childhood obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009; 21:1-7.

Schack-Nielsen L, Sørensen TIa, Mortensen EL, Michaelsen KF. Late introduction of complementary feeding, rather than duration of breastfeeding, may protect against adult overweight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91(3):619-27.

Kramer MS. Breastfeeding, complementary (solid) foods, and long-term risk of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91(3): 500-1.

Escuder MML, Venâncio SY, Pereira JCR. Estimativa de impacto da amamentação sobre a mortalidade infantil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2003; 37(3):319-25.

Victora CG, Behague DP, Barros FC, Olinto MT, Weiderpass E. Pacifier use and hort breastfeeding duration: cause, consequence or coincidence? Pediatrics.1997; 99:445-539.

Mihrshahi S, Ichikawa N, Shuaib M, OddyW, Ampon R, Dibley MJ, et al. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in Bangladesh and its association with diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection: results of the multiple indicator cluster survey 2003. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007; 25(2):195-204.

World Health Organization. Evidence forthe ten steps to successful breast-feeding Rev. ed. Division of Child Health and Development. 2004.

Venâncio SI, Monteiro CA. A tendência da prática da amamentação no Brasil nas décadas de 70 e 80. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 1998; 1:40-49.

IBGE. Metodologia do Estudo Nacional da Despesa Familiar – ENDEF 75. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação IBGE; 1983.

Instituto Nacional de Alimentação a Nutrição. Pesquisa Nacional sobre saúde e Nutrição. Brasília, DF; 1990.

Pesquisa Nacional sobre Demografia e Saúde. Rio de Janeiro: BEMFAM/DHS/IBGE/MS/ UNICEF, PNDS, 1997.

Pesquisa Nacional sobre Demografia e Saúde. Relatório final. Rio de Janeiro: BEMFAM/DHS/IBGE/MS/ UNICEF, PNDS, 2008.

Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde, Área de Saúde da Criança. Prevalência de aleitamento materno nas capitais brasileiras e no Distrito Federal. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2001.

Kummer SC, Giugliani ERJ, Susinc LO, Follettod JL, et al. Evolução do padrão de aleitamento materno. Rev Saúde Pública. 2000; 34(2):143-8.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares, 2002-2003. Aquisição alimentar domiciliar per capita, Brasil e grandes regiões. Rio de Janeiro; 2004.

Pérez-Escamilla R. Breastfeeding and the nutritional transition in the Latin American and Caribbean Region: a success story? Cad. Saúde Pública. 2003; 19(Sup.1):S119-S127.

Suárez Gil P, Alonso Lorenzo JC, López Díaz JL, Martín Rodríguez D, Martínez Suárez MM. Prevalencia y duración de lalactancia materna en Asturias. Gac Sanit. 2000; 15 (2): 104-110.

Niquini R P, Bittencourt S A, Lacerda E MA, Leal M C. Fatores associados à introdução precoce de leite artificial, Município do Rio de Janeiro, 2007. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2009;12(3): 446-457.

Wallby T, Hjern A. Region of birth, income and breastfeeding in a Swedish county. Acta Paediatr. 2009; 98(11):1799-804.

Downloads

Published

2011-08-01

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2011)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis