TRADITION AND CHANGE IN POPULAR CLASSES’S FAMILIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37709Keywords:
Family, familiar roles, popular classes.Abstract
This paper deals with the changing familiar life of migrants in São Paulo’s city. In the urban environment they suffer two simultaneous processes:segregation and disqualification. We discuss, briefly, tradition and change, experienced by the urban popular classes’s families, proposing cultural differences as a partial explanation for the difficult task of adjustment. This adjustment refers more specifically to changes in the patterns of authority which affects the family and to the different ways ofdealing with them altering family organization.
Downloads
References
Aries P. A história social da criança e da família. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 1978.
Benjamin W. Reflexões: a criança, o brinquedo, a educação. São Paulo, Surnmus, 1984, p.90.
Dias MO. Quotidiano e poder em São Paulo no século XIX. São Paulo, Brasiliense, 1984.
Fonseca C. Honra, humor e relações de gênero: um estudo de caso. In: Costa AO, bruschini C. Uma questão de gênero. São Paulo, Rosa dos Ventos, 1992.
Freud S. Psicologia de las macas y analisis dei yo. Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 1973.
Gomes JV. Socialização: um estudo com famílias de migrantes da periferia de São Paulo. São Paulo, 1987. [Tese de Doutorado -USP].
Lefebvre H. O pensamento marxista e a cidade. Lisboa, Ulisséia, s. d., p. 160.
Mello SL. Trabalho e sobrevivência. São Paulo, Ática, 1988.
Pereira I. et al. Trabalho do adolescente: mitos e dilemas. Série Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente, 2, maia, 1994.
Rouanet SP. Mal-estar na modernidade. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 1993, p. 109-278.
Salem T. O velho e o novo. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1980.
Sposito MP. A ilusão fecunda. São Paulo, Hucitec-Edusp, 1993.
Veyne P, Aries P, Duby G.História da vida privada. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 1992, p. 401-402, V.1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis