EDUCATION ON PREVENTION, THE ‘X’ OF THE QUESTION REFLECTIONS ABOUT “XIS-CASINHO” BOOKLET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38368Keywords:
child, education on prevention, AIDS, collective health.Abstract
The booklet presented by the Ministry of Health with the bases for an education on prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Al DS has the merit of being a valuable pedagogical instrument, since it puts the child in contact with a series of information about life on earth in general and, more specifically, with other men. However, in this article we indicate some aspects of the topics developed in the booklet that may betray the original purpose of the teaching- learning process: education on prevention. We assume that education is a complex and dynamic process, capable of embodying a reflection about the human becoming: it is not exclusivelyinfonnation and accumulation of knowledge; it implies a reflection about how a production of sense for the things and the meanings assigned to them takes place. Thus, we discuss the major focal points of the booklet, observing the need for it to get rid of the Jewish and Christian moral traps that it contains, as well as the dogmas which sustain the love relationship and human sexuality. In order to educate it is necessary to uncover the condition of a master who knows
eve~ything; it also requires an effort to uncover what is presented as new in a dialogical relation undertaken by the subjects involved in it.
References
Arendt H. A condição humana. Rio de Janeiro, Universitária, 1991.
Dymetman A. AIDS e o imaginário social. Saúde, Cult. e Socied Caderno N°1, FSP/USP,1995.
Foucault M. Vigiar e punir: história da violência nas prisões. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1988.
Lepargneur H. O doente, a doença e a morte. Campinas, Papirus, 1987.
Levistrauss C. Estruturas elementares do parentesco. Petrópolis,Vozes, 1976.
Ministério da Saude. Programa Nacional de DST/AIDS. Xis-Casinho. Cartilha de 5 a 9anos. Brasília: 1994.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
