THE NURSING CARE TO PRETERM AND LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANT IN HOME FOLLOW UP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39585Keywords:
preterm, low birffi weight, follow-up, nursmg.Abstract
The mursing care given to preterm and low birth weight infante advanced a lot in recent years with the teclmology increment and lhe decline in infant death rales. This caused lhesurvival of a higher number of children and triggered discussions about the quality of life, lhe care needs and lhe follow-up over extended periods of time. The aim of this investigation is to identify the home care given to preterm and low birth weight infants, so as to characterize the follow-up during the first month after discharge from hospital. The methodological focus brings approaches from epidemiology, nursing care and health policies. The empirical study on home
care, based on data consultation in the hospital files, participatory observation and mothers’ oral reports at home, presents a characterization of the analysed children and mothers, hospitalization and attachment and the infant’s health care at home. Following this configuration we point to
aspects of these children’s follow-up through home visiting, composing basic elements of nursing care. Home follow-up involves taking care of the child according to its clinical needs, risks and damages prevention, alimentation, hygiene, use of medication, sensorial stimulation, among others. It also involves the care given by the mother by its side, listening to it, reviving expenences of the child’s hospitalization process, tahng care togeffier wiffi ffie child, giving education in healffi,
comffirt, self-assurance. At the same time, home care implies surveying offier family needs, raising community resources, establishing am integration of information and mtervention between the health services and the support services.
Downloads
References
Alberman E, Evans SJW. Epidemiologia da prematuridade: etiologia, frequência e prognóstico. In: Nestlé Nutrifion Services, O Prematuro. Anais Nestlé, 44: 5-24, 1992.
Almeida MCP, Rocha SMM. (Orgs.). O trabalho de enfermagem. São Paulo, Cortez,1997.
Alvarenga A.T O enfoque de risco. In: Seminário Estadual de Saude da Criança., São Paulo, 1986. Anais. São Paulo, Secretaria da Saúde/lnstituto de Saúde,1986. p.19-24.
Amon E, Anderson GD, Sibai BM, Mabie WC. Factors responsable for preterm de livery of the immature newborn infant (=lOOOg), AMJ Obstet Gynecol ,156(5): 1143-1148,1987.
Angelo M, Veríssimo MDLOR. O papel de enfermeira centrado na criança e na familia. In: Slgaud CHS, Verísslmo MDLOR. (Orgs.). Enfermagem pediátrica: o cuidado de enfermagem à criança e ao adolescente. São Paulo, EPU, 1996. p.89-96.
Avery GB. Neonatology: perspective in ffie mid 1990s. In: Avery GB, Fletcher MA, McDonald MG. Neonatology: pathophysiology and management of newborn.4ed. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippmcot Compamy,1994.
Banco Mundial. Brasil - nova desafo à saúde do adulto. Novas realidades economicas, demográficas e epidemiológicas. Série de estudos do Banco Mundial sobre países. Washington, D.C., 1991. 134p.
Barbosa NMM, Cabral AHL, Silva OPV, Moszkwicz B. Follow-up do bebê de risco. Temas de pediatria-Nestlé, 53, 1993.
Barnett CR, Leiderman PH, Grobstein R, Klaus M. Neonatal separation: the maternal side of interactional deprivation. Pediatrics, 45(2): 197-205, 1970.
Barratt MS, Roach MA, Leavitt LA. Early channels of mufflers infantile communication: preterm and term infants. J. Child Psychol.
Bradley RH, Whiteside L, Mundfrom DI, Casey PH, Kelleher KI, Pope SK. Early indications of resilience and ffieir relation to experiences in the home environments of lowbirffi weight, premature chidren living in poverty. Child Development, 65(2): 346-360,1994.
Cohn A. Políticas sociais e pobreza no Brasil. Planejamento e Políficas Públicas. Brasilia, 12:p. 1-18, jul./dez.1995.
Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Crianças e adolescentes: indicadores sociais. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE, 1992.
Klaus MH, Kennell JH. Moffiers separated fom thenr newsboy infants. Pediatrics Clinics of North America. 17(4):1015-1037,1970.
Ludke M, André MSDA. Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo, EPV, 1986.
Marques MB. A atenção materno-infantil como prioridade política. In: Guimarães R. (Org.). Saúde e medicina no Brasil: contribuição para um debate. Rio de Janeiro, Graal,1984.
May KM. Searching for normalcy: moffiers’caregiving for low birth weight infants. Pediatric. Nurs.,23(1): 17-20, 1997.
Mckin FM. The information and support needs for moffiers of premature infants. J Pediatr Nurs., 8(4): 233-244,1993.
Mcloughlin A. Formal and informal support mothers who have had a baby in a neonatal intensive care unit. Mamchester, 1995. [Thesis of Doctorate - School of Nursing Studies, University of Manchester]
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 3ed. São Paulo Rio de Janeiro, Hucitec/Abrasco, 1994.
Monteiro CA, Ishii M, Benicio MHA, Rea MF. A distribuição do peso ao nascer no município de Sào Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Saúde Públic., S. Paulo, 14(2): 161-172,1980.
Narayanan L. et ai. Maternal participafion in ffie care of ffie high risk mfamt: follow-upevolution.
Penalva O. Seguimento de bebas de alto-risco. In: Curso Nestlé de Atualização em Pediatria, s3., Manaus, 1996. Anais. Manaus, Serviço de Informação Científica Nestié, 1996,p. 135-139.
Ribeirão Preto. Sistema de informações sobre nascidos vivos. Ribeirão Preto, Secretaria Municipal da Saúde, Departamento de Informática, 1996.
Ribeirão Preto. Sistema de informações so-bre nascidos vivos. Ribeirão Preto, Secretaria Municipal da Saúde, Departamento de Informática, 1997.
Rocha SMM, Almeida MCP. O processo de trabalho da enfermagem em saúde coletiva e a intersetorialidade. In: Encontro Estadual de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva,I, Canoas- RS, 1998.
Programa e Resumos.Canoas- Rio Grande do Sul, 1998.
Schaffer AJ, Avery ME. Doenças do recém-nascido. 4aed. Rio de Janeiro, Interamericana, 1979.
Soares LT. Ajuste neoliberal e desajuste social na América Latina. Campinas, 1995. Tese ( Doutorado) - Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Weldt E, et al. Seguimento de ninõs com pes oa nacer inferior a 1500g. Rev. ChiL Pediatr.,60(3): 129-134,1989.
Zahr L. An integrative research review of intervention studies with prematuro infant from disadvantaged backgrounds. Matern Child Nurs J. 1994;22(3):90-101.
Zavaschi MLSA influência de aspectos socioeconômicos desfavoráveis sobre a interação mãe bebê. Revista ABP-APAL, 20(2):66-70, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
