THE ASMATIC CHILD IN THE FAMILY: A STUDY ON A REPRESENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39635Keywords:
asthma, family-asffimatic child reiations, asffimatic chiid.Abstract
The aim of this work, based on the Theory of Social Representations, commected to the Psychoanalytical Theory, was to apprehend the social representation of the family concerning asthmatic children. Five families collaborated. The study matenal was obtained ffirough semistructured home interviews and amalysed ffirough the content amalysis method. Questions were raised regarding the knowledge about ffie disease and the impact that its diagnosis produces on the family relations. Other emerging points were analysed, such as ffie questions of heredity amd blame, negation and fear, feelmgs of ambivaience amd impotence ffiat pervade ffie moffier-child relationship, besides using the disease as a mask to hide a conflicting family structure.References
Ajuriaguerra J, Marcelli D. Manual de psicopatologia infantil. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1991.
Anderson HR. Is the prevalece of asthma chamging? Archives of Disease in Childhood,64 (1): 172-175, 1989.
Badinter E. Um Amor Conquistado: o mito do amor materno. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1985.
Balfour-Lynn L. Growffi and childhood asthma. Anchives of Disease in Childhood, 64(1): 1049-1055, 1989.
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1977.
Buist AS. Asthma mortality: what have we learned? The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 84 (3): 275-283, 1989.
Cadman D, Boyle M, Szatmari P, Offord DR. Chronic illness disability and mental and social well-being. Pediatncs, 79:805-813, 1987.
Campos HS. Asma: um problema global. Jornal de Pneumologia. 1993;19(3): 123-7, 1993.
Carvalho MQR. et al. Asma brônquica infantil. Médico Policlinico, 4 (65): 2-10,1981.
Clark NM. et al. Developing education for children wiffi asthma through study of self management behavior. Health Educ. Quart.,7: 278-297, 1980.
Comte-Sponville A. Bom dia, angústia! São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.
Fernandes AHR. A asma da criança. O Médico, 85(1369): 422-27,1977.
Ferreira ABH. Novo Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1986.
Fritscher CC. et al. Modificações na prevalência de asma brônquica em escolares de Porto Alegre. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia,20: 610, 1994.
Gordon R. A assustadora história da medicina. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro, 1996.
Harrinson H. Medicina interna. 18ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara e Koogan, 1988.
Haynal A, Pasini W. Manual de medicina psicossomática. São Paulo: Masson, 1984.
Jodelet. La representación social: fenômenos, concepto y teoria. In: S. Moscovici (Org.). Psicologia social. Barcelona: Paidos, 1986. p.469-494.
Lewiston NJ, et al. A self-help group for parents of asthmatic childrem. Clin. Pediat,16: 888-890, 1977.
Loras O. Phénoménologie de l’asthme chezl’enfant. Psychologie Médicale, 15(4): 565-70,1983.
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. São Paulo: HucitecAbrasco, 1992.
Moscovici S. A representação social da psicanálise. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1978.
Novilhan P, Dutan G. A criança asmática, como a compreender e ajudar. Lisboa: Moraes Editores, 1983.
Nunes C, et al. Estudo epidemiológico da patologia respiratória em idade escolar. Jornal do Médico, 122(2200): 40-51, 1987.
Park SJ. Aspectos Psicológicos no tratamento da asma em crianças. Baillières Clinical Paediatrics, 3: 417-425, 1995.
Peckham C, Butler N. A national study of asthma childhood. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 32: 79-85,1978.
Phelan P. D. Asma em crianças e adolescentes: generalidades. Baillière’s Clinical Paediatrics, 3: 247-252, 1995.
Reis JRT. Família, emoção e ideologia. In: STM Lane, W Codo (Orgs.). Psicologia Social: o homem em movimento. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1985.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis