CHILDREN ADMINISTRATION IN A BUILDING: ANALYSIS OF A SHARING EXPERIENCE WITH CHILDREN

Authors

  • Regina Zanella Penteado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39668

Keywords:

social participation, citizenship, popular education.

Abstract

Social participation is essential for the process of Health Promotion, and it must be motivated since childhood. The objective of this work is to present a retrospective analysis of the expenence of a Children Administration in a Residential Building, by focusing on its interfenng factors, possibilities and limits. Such experience was an anempt to mo^hvate children to participate actively and responsibly in the matters, decisions and subjects of the building which were part of their irnerests and necessities. The analysis shows that the Children Administration promoted the personal and collective development of tbose children, who got involved actively in other events and subjects of the building by presenting ideas and trying to solve problems. The analysis made it possible to identify important aspects to be observed in fuvnre Children Administration proposals as a contnbution to motivate citizenship and active and real social participation of children and teenagers in several living social environments.

Author Biography

  • Regina Zanella Penteado
    Fonoaudióloga, Mestre e Doutoranda pela Faculdade de Saúde Pública - FSP/USSP.

References

Benevides MVM. A cidadania ativa. 3ª ed. São Paulo. Editora Ática, 1998.

Costa BCG. Jornalismo - controle de informação, conceito de notícia e a fetichização dos fatos. Revista Impulso, 7(15), Unimep/Piracicaba, 1994.

Gohn MG. Teoria dos movimentos sociais. Paradigmas clássicos e contemporâneos. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola, 1997.

Haddad S. Mesa redonda: participação e cidadania na promoção da saúde. Anais do Vl Congresso Paulista de Saúde Pública, Águas de Lindóia, 1999.

Jacobi P. Atores sociais e Estado: movimentos reivindicatórios urbanos e Estado – dimensões da ação coletiva e efeitos político-institucionais no Brasil. Espaço & Debates, 26: 10-21, 1989.

Ministério da Saáde. Promoção da Saúde. Brasilia DF, 2001.

Nunes E. Carências urbanas, reivindicações sociais e valores democráticos. São Paulo, Lua Nova, 17: 67-92,1989.

Downloads

Published

2001-06-19

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2001)

Section

Experience Reports

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis