SCHOOL FOR PARENTS: A REPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39676Keywords:
School for Parents, Court for Childhood and Youth, infractor parents, Statute of the Child and Adolescent.Abstract
In conformity with the Statute of the Child and Adolescent (Estatuto da Crianca e do Adolescente - ECA), article 129, paragraph I^V, chapter V, which states that the attendance tocourses and orientation programs are measures that may be applicable to parents and those in charge of children, the first Court for Childhood and Youth of Rio de Janeiro has been developing the project “School for Parents”. This initiative, through social-educational actions for parents, aims at family reintegration of children and adolescents living in social risk conditions. Nine “Schools for Parents” - each with approximately 8 meetings in its first stage - have been implemented since 1998. During these meetings, various education, health and citizenship related topics have been stressed. This procedure has become an opportunity to point out social rights and duties as far as parentschildren relations are concerned. The families received food supply (“food baskets”) from the Chil&ood and Adolescence Foundation (Fundacao da Infancia e Adolescencia - FIA), free transportation tickets, support to keep children in schools or nurseries sponsored by the community or the Court, orientation given by social assistants and psychologists,
as well as other benefits, thanks to partnership with institutions, organizations and ente~prises, including the private sector. After this first stage, the participants are granted a 12-month support by the program “Family Solidarity”, which is funded by people who sponsor one of the families with the equivalent to I minimum salary per month. Support to fnd oppor~unities for generating income for the families has been another way of social insertion. This includes integrating the on-going co-operative enterprise of the “School for Parents”. The State Secretariat of Social Assistance, the Municipal Secretariat for Social Development and the Tutelary Councils have
been involved in the program, ensuring the progress of this work beyond the Court rooms and reaching the families in their home places.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2001-12-19
Issue
Section
Experience Reports
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis