LANGUAGE DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH DEAFNESS

Authors

  • Letícia Neves de Oliveira Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).
  • Bárbara Niegia Garcia de Goulart Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS).
  • Brasilia Maria Chiari Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.50389

Keywords:

speech pathology, epidemiology, deafness, hearing loss, language.

Abstract

Objective: to assess the association between speech-language disorders related to hearingloss and to describe it regarding gender, chief complaint, and type and degree of hearing loss. Methods: retrospective study of 482 archives of patients with speech-language disorders betweenJuly 1998 and July 2008. Information on age, gender, area of residence, chief complaint /manifestation of language impairment, etiologic diagnosis, and speech-language and hearingimpairment was collected. Results: most were male patients (56%) aged three to five (32,8%)and six to 11 years (32,8%). Their chief complaints included oral language impairment (57%); sensorineural hearing loss (66,3%); profound hearing loss bilateral (32,8%); and an organicetiology (41,7%). A correlation between language disorder with the level of hearing loss andcomplaint of language was statistically significant (p < 0,001). Conclusion: the study found anassociation between language disorder and degree of hearing loss and language complaint.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Letícia Neves de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).
    Speech-Language Pathologist, Research Technician, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).
  • Bárbara Niegia Garcia de Goulart, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS).
    Research Associate, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Assistant Professor, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS).
  • Brasilia Maria Chiari, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).
    Speech-Language Pathologist, Principal Investigator; Full Professor, Human Communication Disorders, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

References

Silva LPA, Queiros F, Lima I. Etiology of hearing impairment in children and adolescents of a reference center APADA in the city of Salvador, state of Bahia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(1):33-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992006000100006

Psillas G, Psifidis A, Antoniadou-Hitoglou M, Kouloulas A. Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006;33(3):259-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2005.11.013

Zocoli AMF, Riechel FC; Zeigelboim BS, Marques JM. Audição: abordagem do pediatra acerca dessa temática. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. 2006;72(5):617-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992006000500007

Vieira ABC, Macedo, LR. O diagnóstico da perda auditiva na infância. Pediatria (São Paulo). 2007;29(1):43-49.

Fernandes DMZ, Lima MCMP, Gonçalves VMG, Francozo MFC. Acompanhamento do desenvolvimento da linguagem de lactentes de risco para surdez. Rev. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(1):30-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000100007

Goulart BNG, Chiari BM. Prevalência de distúrbios de fala em escolares e seus fatores associados. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007;41(5):726-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000500006

Neuber LMB, Do Valle TGM, Palamin MEG. O adolescente e a deficiência auditiva: as relações familiares retratadas no teste do desenho em cores da família. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum [online]. 2008;18(3):321-338.

Barker DH, Quittner AL, Fink NE, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Niparko JK; CDaCI Investigative Team. Predicting behavior problems in deaf and hearing children: the influences of language, attention, and parent-child communication. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21(2):373-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000212

Papalia DE, Olds SW, Feldman RD. Desenvolvimento Humano. Bueno D, trad. 8 nd ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006.

Perissinoto J, Chiari BM. A avaliação como ação precursora do diagnóstico. In: C R F Andrade. (Org.). Fisioterapia, fonoaudiologia e terapia ocupacional em pediatria. 3 nd ed. São Paulo: 2003

Bauer, ILB. Consequências da perda auditiva leve versus diagnóstico precoce (Tese). Porto Alegre: CEFAC, 1999.

Nogueira JCR, Mendonça MC. Assessment of hearing in a municipal public school student population. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(6):716-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600007

Lima BPS, Guimarães JATL, Rocha MCG. Características epidemiológicas das alterações de linguagem em um centro fonoaudiológico do primeiro setor. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2008;13(4):376-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342008000400013

Uus K, Bamford J. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e887-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1064

Pinto MM, Raimundo JC, Samelli AG, Carvalho ACM, Matas CG, Ferrari GMS, et al. Idade no diagnóstico e no início da intervenção de crianças deficientes auditivas em um serviço público de saúde auditiva brasileiro. Arq. Int. Otorrinolaringol. 2012; 16(1): 44-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7162/S1809-48722012000100006

Rabelo ATV; Alves CRL; Goulart LMHF; Friche AAL; Lemos SMA; Campos FR; et al. Speech disorders in students in Belo Horizonte. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011; 23(4): 344-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-64912011000400009

Baille MF, Arnaud C, Cans C, Grandjean H, du Mazaubrun C, Rumeau-Rouquette C. Prevalence, aetiology, and care of severe and profound hearing loss. Arch Dis Child. 1996;75(2):129-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.75.2.129

Costa RG, Souza LBR. Perfil dos usuários e da demanda pelo serviço da clínica-escola de fonoaudiologia da UFBA. Rev. ciênc. méd. biol. 2009;8(1):53-59.

Diniz RD, Bordin R. Demanda em Fonoaudiologia em um serviço público municipal da região sul do Brasil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(2):126-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000200004

Goulart BNG, Henckel C, Klering CE, Martini M. Fonoaudiologia e promoção da saúde: relato de experiência baseado em visitas domiciliares. Rev CEFAC. 2010;12(5):842-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010005000095

Carvalho JF, Homem, FCB. A influência do meio na aquisição da linguagem. Fono atual. 2001;4(17):14-16.

Vieira EP, Miranda EC, Azevedo MF, Garcia MV. Ocorrência dos indicadores de risco para a deficiência auditiva infantil no decorrer de quatro anos em um programa de triagem auditiva neonatal de um hospital público. Rev. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol. 2007; 12(3): 214-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342007000300009

Gatto CI, Tochetto TM. Deficiência auditiva infantil: implicações e soluções. Rev. CEFAC. 2007;9(1):110-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462007000100014

Dunmade AD, Segun-Busari S, Olajide TG, Ologe FE. Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss in nigerian children: any shift in etiology? J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007;12(1):112-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enl019

Downloads

Published

2013-01-23

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2013)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis