Scientific method and research in health: orientation for professional practice

Autores/as

  • Sandra Dircinha Teixeira de Araújo Moraes Hospital Maternidade de Osasco/ Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.157742

Palabras clave:

research, health, method, professional practice

Resumen

In the health area, research is designed to develop reliable data on problems and needs that are important to the individual/community, with a particular focus on guiding practitioners. Today, due to innumerable innovations in health, health decision-making needs to be based on scientific principles, which is a daily process that is integral to the rhythm of life, product and reason for social interests in confrontation based on learning, not summarized to mere reproduction. In this context, when considering that the quality of the research is directly linked to the presentation of the results, it is important to note the importance of the construction of research protocols that present the step-by-step techniques of organization and analysis of the data, understanding that the researcher, when in possession of collected data, must be sure that when they work respecting the chosen technique, they will indicate the evidences of the study, with possibilities to achieve a new knowledge with the minimum of bias that can happen. Thus, it is understood the importance of emphasizing the scientific method as a way for the development of scientific research in order to achieve the objectives set, increasing the rigor of the research to give visibility to information that enables the professional practices conscious and within of criteria that contribute to decision making on care based on validated scientific information.

 

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Sandra Dircinha Teixeira de Araújo Moraes, Hospital Maternidade de Osasco/ Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo

    In the health area, research is designed to develop reliable data on problems and needs that are important to the individual/community, with a particular focus on guiding practitioners. Today, due to innumerable innovations in health, health decision-making needs to be based on scientific principles, which is a daily process that is integral to the rhythm of life, product and reason for social interests in confrontation based on learning, not summarized to mere reproduction. In this context, when considering that the quality of the research is directly linked to the presentation of the results, it is important to note the importance of the construction of research protocols that present the step-by-step techniques of organization and analysis of the data, understanding that the researcher, when in possession of collected data, must be sure that when they work respecting the chosen technique, they will indicate the evidences of the study, with possibilities to achieve a new knowledge with the minimum of bias that can happen. Thus, it is understood the importance of emphasizing the scientific method as a way for the development of scientific research in order to achieve the objectives set, increasing the rigor of the research to give visibility to information that enables the professional practices conscious and within of criteria that contribute to decision making on care based on validated scientific information.

     

Referencias

1. Polit DF, Beck CT. Resource Manual for Nursing Research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.

2. Schmidt M, Duncan B. Epidemiologia clínica e medicina baseada em evidências. In: Rouquayrol MZ. Epidemiologia e saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi, 2003; p.193-227.

3. Galvão CM, Sawada NO, Trevizan MA. Systematic review: a resource that allows for the incorporation of evidence into nursing practice. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2004;12(3):549-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692004000300014

4. Pedrolo E, Danski MTR, Mingorance P, Lazzari LSM, Méier MJ, Crozeta K. A prática baseada em evidências como ferramenta para prática profissional do enfermeiro. Cogitare Enferm. 2009;14(4):760-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v14i4.16396

5. CM Galvão, Sawada NO, Rossi LA. A prática baseada em evidências: considerações teóricas para sua implementação na enfermagem perioperatória. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2002;10(5):690-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692002000500010

6. Domenico EBL, Ide CAC. Enfermagem baseada em evidências: princípios e aplicabilidades. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2003;11(1):115-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692003000100017

7. Trivaños ANS. Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.

8. Silva I da, Mettrau MB. Talento acadêmico e desempenho escolar: a importância da motivação no contexto educacional. Est Inter Psicol. 2010;1(2):216-34.

9. Rodwell MK. Um modelo alternativo de pesquisa: o construtivismo. Rev FAEEBA. 1994;3(1):125-41.

10. Rodwel MK. Social work constructivist research. New York: Routledge; 1998.

11. Landim FLP, Lourinho LA, Lira RCM, Santos ZMSA. Uma reflexão sobre as abordagens em pesquisa com ênfase na integração qualitativo-quantitativa. Rev Bras Promoção Saúde. 2006;19(1):53-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5020/961

12. Deslandes SF, Assis SG. Abordagens quantitativa e qualitativa em saúde: o diálogo das diferenças. In: Minayo MCS, Deslandes S. Caminhos do pensamento: epistemologia e método. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2002; p. 195-219.

13. Marinho MNASB, Vieira NFC, Ferreira HS, Pequeno AMC, Sousa IC, Pereira AP, et al. Health in school program: from training processes to practice scenarios. J Hum Growth Dev. 2018;28(2):175-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.147219

14. Coutinho BLM, Feitosa AA, Diniz CBC, Ramos JLS, Ribeiro LZ, Amorim SR, et al. Alcohol and drugs in adolescence: work process in health in school program. J Hum Growth Dev. 2017;27(1):28-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.127646

15. Silva RSD, IMP Bezerra, Monteiro CBM, Adami F, Souza HMF Jr, Abreu LC. Nurses’ knowledge and practices in the face of the challenge of using the systematization of nursing care as an instrument of assistance in a first aid in Brazil. Medicina (Baltimore). 2018;97(33):e11509. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011509

16. Leitão PA, Bezerra IMP, Santos EFS, Ribeiro SL, Takasu JM, Abreu LC. Reducing the average speed of automotive vehicles in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, reduces transit accidents in the period 2010 to 2016. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019;29(1): 83-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.157755

17. Boas ACV, Monteiro QRS, Silva RPM, Meneguetti DUO. Profile of suicide attempts treated in a Public Hospital of Rio Branco, Acre State from 2007 to 2016. . J Hum Growth Dev. 2019; 29(1):57-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.157750

18. Oliveira BM, Lucena KDT, Gomes RGS, Coêlho HFC, Vianna RPT, Meira RMB. Spatial distribution of domestic violence against women. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019; 29(1): 102-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152305

19. Vincenzi T, Mario DN, Cericato GO, Portilio MN, Rigo L. Emergence of cannabis as the second most commonly used psychoactive substance among students. J Hum Growth Dev. 2017;27(2):244-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.125827

20. Santos SB, Machado APA, Sampaio LA, Abreu LC, Bezerra IMP. Acquired Syphilis: construction and validation of educational technology for adolescents. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019;29(1):65-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.157752

21. Moreira RS, Magalhães LC, Siqueira CM, Alves CRL. Cross-cultural adaptation of the child development surveillance instrument “Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC)” in the Brazilian context. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019;29(1): 28-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd. 145001

22. Almeida RC, Zachêu PRZ, Diniz MT, Dias MCCPO, Guiguer IC, Almeida RC, et al. Translation and cultural adaptation to the questionnaire Assessment of Burden in Chronic-Venous Disease ABC-V for Portuguese. J Hum Growth Dev. 2018;28(1):89-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.143885

23. Pereira VX, da Silva AP, Carlesso JS, Campos MF. A Rare Case of a Maxillary Fourth Molar: Case Report. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019; 29(1): 125-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.157763

24. Sousa GVG, Lage JB, Guimarães EL. Motor development analysis of three-year-old children born preterm through the Motor Development Scale - Case Report. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019;29(1): 22-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.140229

25. Scalco JC, Coelho R, Mucha FC, Schivinski CIS. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia on pulmonary function during childhood: a systematic review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2017;27(1):109-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.127685

Descargas

Publicado

2019-05-06

Número

Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2019)

Sección

Editorial

Licencia

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis