Argumentation Within Language as Subsidy for the Evaluation of Reading Practices and Production of Argumentative Texts

Authors

  • Lauro Gomes Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2236-4242.v29i2p295-319

Keywords:

Semantic, Argumentation in language, Evaluation, Writing, Dissertative-argumentative texts.

Abstract

This paper aims to present an evaluation proposal of the performance in reading and writing dissertative-argumentative texts, based on principles and concepts from the theory of Argumentation in Language – created by Jean-Claude Anscombre and Oswald Ducrot, especially the version of the Theory of the Semantic Blocks and the works inspired by it. The goal is to create criteria which are capable of being less intuitive in judging the performance in reading and wrinting dissertative-argumentative texts. The analysis of the corpora – the Enem 2011’s composition proposal and 50 (fifty) texts written by the students – and the test of the criteria of reading and writing evaluation in this work revealed practice funcionality and efficiency of criteria. The results allow these criteria to be applied in any evaluation processes of dissertative-argumenative texts. Finally, this paper offers theoretical and methodological subisdies which can help teachers and professors to qualify their teaching of reading and writing and the evaluation of student’s texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-12

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 2 (2016): Argumentation in the Studies of Text and Discourse

Section

Articles

License

The Editorial Board authorizes free access to and distribution of published contentes, provided that the source is cited, that is, granding credit to the authors and Linha D'Água and preserving the full text. The author is allowed to place the final version (postprint / editor’s PDF) in an institutional/thematic repositor or personal page (site, blog), immediately after publication, provided that it is available for open access and comes without any embargo period. Full reference should be made to the first publication in Linha D'Água. Access to the paper should at least be aligned with the access the journal offers.

As a legal entity, the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages owns and holds the copyright deriving from the publication. To use the papers, Paidéia adopts the Creative Commons Licence, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution. This licence permits access, download, print, share, reuse and distribution of papers, provided that this is for non-commercial use and that the source is cited, giving due authorship credit to Linha D'Água. In these cases, neither authors nor editors need any permission.

Partial reproduction of other publications

Citations of more than 500 words, reproductions of one or more figures, tables or other illustrions should be accompanied by written permission from the copyright owner of the original work with a view to reproduction in Linha D'Água. This permission has to be addressed to the author of the submitted manuscript. Secondarily obtained rights will not be transferred under any circumstance.

How to Cite

GOMES, Lauro. Argumentation Within Language as Subsidy for the Evaluation of Reading Practices and Production of Argumentative Texts. Linha D’Água, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 2, p. 295–319, 2016. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2236-4242.v29i2p295-319. Disponível em: https://periodicos.usp.br/linhadagua/article/view/119698.. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.