Escala de Seguridad en el Subsistema Interparental: Pruebas de validez en Brasil

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3314

Palabras clave:

regulación emocional, adolescentes, adaptación, psicometría

Resumen

la regulación emocional en los adolescentes es un aspecto poco observado, especialmente por los investigadores y los profesionales de la salud en Brasil. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo traducir, adaptar y examinar las propiedades psicométricas, la consistencia interna y la validez de constructo de La Escala de Seguridad en el Subsistema Interparental (SIS) en una muestra de 345 adolescentes de 14 a 18 años (M = 16.06 años, DT = 1.22). Los resultados, obtenidos mediante Modelización de Ecuaciones Estructurales, mostraron una versión de seis factores: reactividad emocional, desregulación conductual, evitación, implicación, representaciones destructivas de la familia, representaciones del desbordamiento del conflicto. Los modelos mostraron un buen ajuste con invarianza entre los grupos analizados. La confiabilidad de la escala mostró valores adecuados. Las pruebas realizadas sugieren que el SIS tiene propiedades psicométricas satisfactorias en la muestra de adolescentes, por lo tanto, un instrumento de medición fiable para su uso en Brasil por clínicos e investigadores.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment. (2014). ASEBA subsequent developments. https://aseba.org/aseba-subsequent-developments

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: An integrated system of multi-informant assessment. ASEBA.

Bergman, K. N., Choe, G. E., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2018). The ubiquitous family environment: Examining emotional insecurity in the family and adjustment in school. Family Court Review, 56(2), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12337

Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272253201314

Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. Guilford.

Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 387-411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387

Davies, P. T., Forman, E. M., Rasi, J. A., & Stevens, K. I. (2002). Assessing children’s emotional security in the interparental relationship: The Security in the Interparental Subsystem Scales. Child Development, 73(2), 544-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00423

Davies, P. T., Hentges, R. F., Coe, J. L., Martin, M. J., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Cummings, E. M. (2016). The multiple faces of interparental conflict: Implications for cascades of children’s insecurity and externalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000170

Davies, P. T., & Martin, M. J. (2013). The reformulation of emotional security theory: The role of children’s social defense in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4 Pt 2), 1435-1454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000709

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63(3), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01646.x

Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001

Holt, T., Helland, M. S., Gustavson, K., Cummings, E. M., Ha, A., & Røysamb, E. (2020). Assessing children’s responses to interparental conflict: Validation and short scale development of SIS and CPIC-properties scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00586-7

Holt, T., Helland, M. S., Morbech, M., Larsen, L., Gustavson, K., Ha, A., & Cummings, E. M. (2021). Agreement between child and parent reports of children’s reactions to interparental conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(8), 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000861

Li, Z., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Liu, S., & Davies, P. T. (2020). Parent-adolescent physiological synchrony: Moderating effects of adolescent emotional insecurity. Psychophysiology, 57(9), e13596. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13596

Machado, M. R., & Mosmann, C. P. (2020). Coparental conflict and triangulation, emotion regulation, and externalizing problems in adolescents: Direct and indirect relationships. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 30, e3004. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3004

Martynova, E., West, S. G., & Liu, Y. (2018). Review of principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1401932

Silva, C. S., Calheiros, M. M., & Carvalho, H. (2016). Security in the Interparental Subsystem (SIS) Scale: Psychometric characteristics in a sample of portuguese adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 31(2), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9767-x

van Eldik, W. M., de Haan, A. D., Parry, L. Q., Davies, P. T., Luijk, M. P. C. M., Arends, L. R., & Prinzie, P. (2020). The interparental relationship: Meta-analytic associations with children’s maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 553-594. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000233

Vian, M., Mosmann, C. P., & Falcke, D. (2018). Repercussões da conjugalidade em sintomas internalizantes e externalizantes em filhos adolescentes [Repercussions of conjugality in internalizing and externalizing symptoms of adolescent children]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, e34431. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e34431

Publicado

2024-05-06

Número

Sección

Evaluación Psicológica

Cómo citar

Machado, M. R., Costa, C. B. da, Schünke, L. K., & Mosmann, C. P. (2024). Escala de Seguridad en el Subsistema Interparental: Pruebas de validez en Brasil. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3314. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3314