A Teoria dos Emaranhados Biossociomateriais: entrelaçamentos entre Coisas e Humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/1678-9857.ra.2022.201444Palavras-chave:
Emaranhados Biossociomateriais, Coisas e Humanos, CodependênciaResumo
Este artigo aborda a teoria arqueológica sobre os emaranhados entre coisas e humanos, entendendo essa relação como fluxos de matéria, energia e informação. O mundo cultural não pode ser entendido como dados auto-evidentes; as coisas participam de um longo processo de interdependência, construção e transmissão de conhecimento. O emaranhado é composto de abstrações conceituais e ressonância corporal, uma reverberação entre mente, corpo e mundo das coisas. Os emaranhados biossociomateriais dizem respeito à dialética da dependência e sujeição entre humanos e coisas. Abordar o emaranhado entre humanos e coisas permite um diálogo entre as humanidades, ciências sociais, ciências biológicas e ciências materiais nas investigações arqueológicas e antropológicas.
Downloads
Referências
Aolita, L.; De Melo, F.; Davidovich, L. 2015. Open-system dynamics of entanglement: a key issues review. Reports on Progress in Physics (Online), v. 78, p. 042001.
Appadurai, A. (ed) 1986. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: an Archaeology of Social Life in Britain 2900–1200 B.C. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bekaert, S. 1998. Multiple levels of meaning and the tension of consciousness. Archaeological Dialogues 5(1), 6–29.
Bentley, R.A.; Maschner, H.D.G. (eds) 2003. Complex Systems and Archaeology: Empirical and Theoretical Applications. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: a Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Boivin, N. 2008. Material Cultures. Material Minds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, B. 2001. Thing theory. Critical Inquiry 28(1), 1–22.
Brown, B. 2003. A Sense of Things. The Object Matter of American Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Candlin, F.; Guins, R. 2009. The Object Reader. London: Routledge.
Clark, A. 1997. Being there. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Cole, M. 1998. Cultural Psychology: a Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Copé, S. M. 2015. A. gênese das paisangens culturais do planalto sul brasileiro. Estudos Avançados 29(83), 149-171.
Corteletti, R. et al. 2015. Revisiting the economy and mobility of southern proto-Jê (Taquara-Itararé) groups in the southern Brazilian highlands: Starch grain and phytoliths analyses from the Bonin site, Urubici, Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science. v. 58, p. 46-61.
Corteletti, R.; Iriarte, J. 2018. Recent Advances in the Archaeology of the Southern Proto-Jê People. In: Smith, C. (Org.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. 2ed.New York: Springer International Publishing, 1-11.
Davidovich, L. 2016. From quantum to classical: Schrödinger cats, entanglement, and decoherence. Physica Scripta (Print), v. 91, p. 063013.
Deetz, J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten. New York: Anchor.
Deleuze, G.; F. Guattari 2004. A Thousand Plateaus (trans. B. Massumi). London: Continuum.
DeMarrais, E.; Gosden, C.; Renfrew, C. (eds) 2004. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagements of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Domanska, E. 2006. The return to things. Archaeologia Polona 44, 171–85.
Donald, M. 1991.Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Geertz, C. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Gosden C. 1994. Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Guignon, C.B. 1993. Introduction. In Guignon, C.B. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to
Heidegger. Cambridge University Press. 1–41.
Heidegger, M. 1973. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, I. (ed) 2000. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph.
Hodder, I.; Hutson, S. 2003. Reading the Past. Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. (3rd revised edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. (ed). 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 17, 154–77.
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Hodder, I (ed). 2014. Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society. Vital Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 2016. Studies in Human-Thing Entanglement. [s.l.]: Edição de autor. 174 páginas. http://www.ian-hodder.com/books/studies-human-thing-entanglement
Hodder, I. 2018. Where Are We Heading? The Evolution of Humans and Things. New Have andLondon: Yale University Press.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Censo Brasileiro de 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2012.
Ihde, D. 1999. Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1), 1–16.
Ingold, T. 2010. Bringing things back to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Working Paper Series 05/10. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/.
Johnson, M. 2010. Archaeological Theory. An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jordan, K.A. 2009a. Colonies, colonialism, and cultural entanglement: the archaeology of Postcolumbian intercultural relations. In: Majewski, T and Gaimster, D. (eds) International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. New York: Springer. 31–49.
Jordan, J.S. 2009b. Wild agency: nested intentionalities in cognitive neuroscience and archaeology. In: Renfrew, C.; Frith, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) The Sapient Mind: Archaeology meets Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 71–87.
Karlsson H. 1998. Re-thinking Archaeology. Göteborg: Gotarc Series B, 8.
Keane, W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Communication 23, 409–25.
Knappett, C. 2005. Thinking Through Material Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Knappett, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) 2008. Material Agency. Towards a non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.
Latour, B. 1993. We have Never been Modern. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lebev, M. A.; Nicolelis, M.A.L. 2006. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trendes in Neurosciences, v. 29, p. 536-546.
Lebedev, M. A.; Nicolelis, M.A. L. 2017. Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation. Physiological Reviews, v. 97, p. 767-837.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964–65. Le Geste et la Parole (2 vols.). Paris: Albin Michel.
Lucas, G. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lucas, G. 2008. Time and the archaeological event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(1), 59–65.
Massey, D. 2005. For Space. New York: Sage Publications Ltd.
Mauss, M. 1950. Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: PUF (Bibliotheque de Sociologie contemporaine).
Mbembe, A. 2001. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McGlade, J.; van der Leeuw, S. 1997. Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Meskell, L. (ed) 2005. Archaeologies of Materiality. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mlodinow, L. 2008. The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
Miller, D. (ed) 2005. Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nicolelis, M. A. L.; Lebedev, Mikhail A. 2009. Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 10, p. 530-540.
Nuttall, S. 2009. Entanglement. Literary and Cultural Reflections on Post-Apartheid. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Passos, M.H.M.; Balthazar, W.F.; Khoury, A. Z.; Hor-Meyll, M. ; Davidovich, L. ; Huguenin, J. A. O. 2018. Experimental investigation of environment-induced entanglement using an all-optical setup. PHYSICAL REVIEW A , v. 97, p. 022321.
Pelegrin, J. 1990. Prehistoric lithic technology: some aspects of research. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9, 116–25.
Pels, P. 1998. The spirit of matter: on fetish, rarity, fact, and fancy. In: Spyer, P. (ed) Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places. New York: Routledge. 91–121.
Peirce, C.S. 1932. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. II: Elements of Logic. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Pitt-Rivers, A. Lane-Fox [1874 and 1875] 1906. The Evolution of Culture and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Preda, A. 1999. The turn to things: arguments for a sociological theory of things. The Sociological Quarterly 40(2), 347–66.
Preucel, R.W. 2006. Archaeological Semiotics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Renfrew, C.; Cooke, K. (eds) 1979. Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change. London: Academic Press.
Renfrew, C. 2001. Symbol before concept. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. 122–40.
Renfrew, C. 2004. Towards a theory of material engagement. In: Demarrais, E., Gosden, C., Renfrew, C. (eds) Rethinking Materiality. Cambridge: McDonald Archaeological Institute. 23–32.
Richerson, P.J.; Boyd, R. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2016. Clausurar el pasado para inaugurar el futuro: Desandando por una calle paceña. Agenda 21 da Cultura. https://bit.ly/2Plgw0I
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2018. Un mundo ch’ixi es posible: Ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Tinta Limón.
Santos, B. S.; Meneses, M. P. 2009. Epistemologias do Sul. Almedina.
Searle, J.R. 2000. What is a speech act? In: Stainton, R. (ed) Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language: a Concise Anthology. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press. 253–68.
Shore, B. 1996. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shults, L. 2010. Spiritual entanglement: transforming religious symbols at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 73–98.
Schrödinger, E. 1935. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften volume 23, 807–812.
Skibo, J.M.; Schiffer, M.B. 2008. People and Things. A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. New York: Springer.
Stockhammer, P. W. Conceptualizing cultural Hybridization: A Transdisciplinary Approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Stockhammer, P. W. From Hybridity to Entanglement, From Essentialism to Practice. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vl. 28.1, 2013.
Teixeira-Bastos, M.; Ferreira, L.M.; Hodder, I. 2020. Isso não é um artigo: dialogando com Ian Hodder sobre a virada ontológica em Arqueologia. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, vol. 33, Issue 2, 118 - 134.
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. London: Berg.
Thomas, N. 1991. Entangled objects. Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Thomas, J. 1999. Time, Culture and Identity. London: Routledge.
van der Leeuw, S. 1998. The Archaeomedes Project. Brussels: European Commission.
van der Leeuw, S. 2008. Agency, networks, past and future. In: Knappett, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) Material Agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer. 217–47.
Van Huyssteen, J.W. 2010. Coding the nonvisible: epistemic limitations and understanding symbolic behaviour at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 99–121.
Webmoor, T.; Witmore, C. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41, 53–70.
Wiesemann, U. G. 2011. Dicionário Kaingang-Português/Portugês-Kaingang. Curitiba: Editora Esperança.
Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wynn, T. 1993. Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In Gibson, K.R. and Ingold, T. (eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 389–406.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Antropologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Revista de Antropologia concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) após o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
Dados de financiamento
-
John Templeton Foundation
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Números do Financiamento 2017/24205-1;2018/18665-2