A Teoria dos Emaranhados Biossociomateriais: entrelaçamentos entre Coisas e Humanos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/1678-9857.ra.2022.201444

Palavras-chave:

Emaranhados Biossociomateriais, Coisas e Humanos, Codependência

Resumo

Este artigo aborda a teoria arqueológica sobre os emaranhados entre coisas e humanos, entendendo essa relação como fluxos de matéria, energia e informação. O mundo cultural não pode ser entendido como dados auto-evidentes; as coisas participam de um longo processo de interdependência, construção e transmissão de conhecimento. O emaranhado é composto de abstrações conceituais e ressonância corporal, uma reverberação entre mente, corpo e mundo das coisas. Os emaranhados biossociomateriais dizem respeito à dialética da dependência e sujeição entre humanos e coisas. Abordar o emaranhado entre humanos e coisas permite um diálogo entre as humanidades, ciências sociais, ciências biológicas e ciências materiais nas investigações arqueológicas e antropológicas.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Ian Hodder, Stanford University

    Ian Hodder joined the Department of Cultural and Social Anthropology in September of 1999. Among his publications are: Symbols in Action (Cambridge 1982), Reading the Past (Cambridge 1986), The Domestication of Europe (Oxford 1990), The Archaeological Process (Oxford 1999). Catalhoyuk: The Leopard's Tale (Thames and Hudson 2006), and Entangled. An archaeology of the relationhips between humans and things (Wiley and Blackwell, 2012). Professor Hodder has been conducting the excavation of the 9,000 year-old Neolithic site of Catalhoyuk in central Turkey since 1993. The 25-year project has three aims - to place the art from the site in its full environmental, economic and social context, to conserve the paintings, plasters and mud walls, and to present the site to the public. The project is also associated with attempts to develop reflexive methods in archaeology. Dr. Hodder is currently the Dunlevie Family Professor.

  • Marcio Teixeira-Bastos, Universidade de São Paulo

    Pós-Doutorado em Arqueologia na Stanford University (STANFORD-U.S.), ano letivo 2019-2020, convidado pelo Prof. Dr. Ian Hodder para o Archaeology Center, School of Humanities & Sciences. Pós-Doutorado em História (Cultura, Historiografia e Patrimônio) pela UNESP-Assis (2018-atual). Pós-Doutorado em Arqueometria no MAE-USP (2017-2019). Doutor em Arqueologia pelo Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MAE-USP, ano letivo 2016) e PhD in Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures pela School of Jewish Studies, Institute of Archaeology da Tel Aviv University (TAU-IL), (Doutorado Co-tutela, ano letivo 2015-2019). Foi Overseas PhD Student do Department of Archaeology na Durham University (DUR-U.K.), Reino Unido (ano letivo 2013-2014).

Referências

Aolita, L.; De Melo, F.; Davidovich, L. 2015. Open-system dynamics of entanglement: a key issues review. Reports on Progress in Physics (Online), v. 78, p. 042001.

Appadurai, A. (ed) 1986. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: an Archaeology of Social Life in Britain 2900–1200 B.C. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bekaert, S. 1998. Multiple levels of meaning and the tension of consciousness. Archaeological Dialogues 5(1), 6–29.

Bentley, R.A.; Maschner, H.D.G. (eds) 2003. Complex Systems and Archaeology: Empirical and Theoretical Applications. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: a Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

Boivin, N. 2008. Material Cultures. Material Minds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, B. 2001. Thing theory. Critical Inquiry 28(1), 1–22.

Brown, B. 2003. A Sense of Things. The Object Matter of American Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Candlin, F.; Guins, R. 2009. The Object Reader. London: Routledge.

Clark, A. 1997. Being there. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Cole, M. 1998. Cultural Psychology: a Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Copé, S. M. 2015. A. gênese das paisangens culturais do planalto sul brasileiro. Estudos Avançados 29(83), 149-171.

Corteletti, R. et al. 2015. Revisiting the economy and mobility of southern proto-Jê (Taquara-Itararé) groups in the southern Brazilian highlands: Starch grain and phytoliths analyses from the Bonin site, Urubici, Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science. v. 58, p. 46-61.

Corteletti, R.; Iriarte, J. 2018. Recent Advances in the Archaeology of the Southern Proto-Jê People. In: Smith, C. (Org.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. 2ed.New York: Springer International Publishing, 1-11.

Davidovich, L. 2016. From quantum to classical: Schrödinger cats, entanglement, and decoherence. Physica Scripta (Print), v. 91, p. 063013.

Deetz, J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten. New York: Anchor.

Deleuze, G.; F. Guattari 2004. A Thousand Plateaus (trans. B. Massumi). London: Continuum.

DeMarrais, E.; Gosden, C.; Renfrew, C. (eds) 2004. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagements of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.

Domanska, E. 2006. The return to things. Archaeologia Polona 44, 171–85.

Donald, M. 1991.Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Geertz, C. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

Gosden C. 1994. Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.

Guignon, C.B. 1993. Introduction. In Guignon, C.B. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to

Heidegger. Cambridge University Press. 1–41.

Heidegger, M. 1973. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hodder, I. (ed) 2000. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph.

Hodder, I.; Hutson, S. 2003. Reading the Past. Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. (3rd revised edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. (ed). 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 17, 154–77.

Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Hodder, I (ed). 2014. Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society. Vital Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. 2016. Studies in Human-Thing Entanglement. [s.l.]: Edição de autor. 174 páginas. http://www.ian-hodder.com/books/studies-human-thing-entanglement

Hodder, I. 2018. Where Are We Heading? The Evolution of Humans and Things. New Have andLondon: Yale University Press.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Censo Brasileiro de 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2012.

Ihde, D. 1999. Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1), 1–16.

Ingold, T. 2010. Bringing things back to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Working Paper Series 05/10. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/.

Johnson, M. 2010. Archaeological Theory. An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Jordan, K.A. 2009a. Colonies, colonialism, and cultural entanglement: the archaeology of Postcolumbian intercultural relations. In: Majewski, T and Gaimster, D. (eds) International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. New York: Springer. 31–49.

Jordan, J.S. 2009b. Wild agency: nested intentionalities in cognitive neuroscience and archaeology. In: Renfrew, C.; Frith, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) The Sapient Mind: Archaeology meets Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 71–87.

Karlsson H. 1998. Re-thinking Archaeology. Göteborg: Gotarc Series B, 8.

Keane, W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Communication 23, 409–25.

Knappett, C. 2005. Thinking Through Material Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Knappett, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) 2008. Material Agency. Towards a non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.

Latour, B. 1993. We have Never been Modern. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lebev, M. A.; Nicolelis, M.A.L. 2006. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trendes in Neurosciences, v. 29, p. 536-546.

Lebedev, M. A.; Nicolelis, M.A. L. 2017. Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation. Physiological Reviews, v. 97, p. 767-837.

Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964–65. Le Geste et la Parole (2 vols.). Paris: Albin Michel.

Lucas, G. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. Abingdon: Routledge.

Lucas, G. 2008. Time and the archaeological event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(1), 59–65.

Massey, D. 2005. For Space. New York: Sage Publications Ltd.

Mauss, M. 1950. Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: PUF (Bibliotheque de Sociologie contemporaine).

Mbembe, A. 2001. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.

McGlade, J.; van der Leeuw, S. 1997. Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology. London: Routledge.

Meskell, L. (ed) 2005. Archaeologies of Materiality. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mlodinow, L. 2008. The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives. New York: Random House Publishing Group.

Miller, D. (ed) 2005. Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.

Nicolelis, M. A. L.; Lebedev, Mikhail A. 2009. Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 10, p. 530-540.

Nuttall, S. 2009. Entanglement. Literary and Cultural Reflections on Post-Apartheid. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.

Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

Passos, M.H.M.; Balthazar, W.F.; Khoury, A. Z.; Hor-Meyll, M. ; Davidovich, L. ; Huguenin, J. A. O. 2018. Experimental investigation of environment-induced entanglement using an all-optical setup. PHYSICAL REVIEW A , v. 97, p. 022321.

Pelegrin, J. 1990. Prehistoric lithic technology: some aspects of research. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9, 116–25.

Pels, P. 1998. The spirit of matter: on fetish, rarity, fact, and fancy. In: Spyer, P. (ed) Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places. New York: Routledge. 91–121.

Peirce, C.S. 1932. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. II: Elements of Logic. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Pitt-Rivers, A. Lane-Fox [1874 and 1875] 1906. The Evolution of Culture and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Preda, A. 1999. The turn to things: arguments for a sociological theory of things. The Sociological Quarterly 40(2), 347–66.

Preucel, R.W. 2006. Archaeological Semiotics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Renfrew, C.; Cooke, K. (eds) 1979. Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change. London: Academic Press.

Renfrew, C. 2001. Symbol before concept. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. 122–40.

Renfrew, C. 2004. Towards a theory of material engagement. In: Demarrais, E., Gosden, C., Renfrew, C. (eds) Rethinking Materiality. Cambridge: McDonald Archaeological Institute. 23–32.

Richerson, P.J.; Boyd, R. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2016. Clausurar el pasado para inaugurar el futuro: Desandando por una calle paceña. Agenda 21 da Cultura. https://bit.ly/2Plgw0I

Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2018. Un mundo ch’ixi es posible: Ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Tinta Limón.

Santos, B. S.; Meneses, M. P. 2009. Epistemologias do Sul. Almedina.

Searle, J.R. 2000. What is a speech act? In: Stainton, R. (ed) Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language: a Concise Anthology. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press. 253–68.

Shore, B. 1996. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shults, L. 2010. Spiritual entanglement: transforming religious symbols at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 73–98.

Schrödinger, E. 1935. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften volume 23, 807–812.

Skibo, J.M.; Schiffer, M.B. 2008. People and Things. A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. New York: Springer.

Stockhammer, P. W. Conceptualizing cultural Hybridization: A Transdisciplinary Approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.

Stockhammer, P. W. From Hybridity to Entanglement, From Essentialism to Practice. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vl. 28.1, 2013.

Teixeira-Bastos, M.; Ferreira, L.M.; Hodder, I. 2020. Isso não é um artigo: dialogando com Ian Hodder sobre a virada ontológica em Arqueologia. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, vol. 33, Issue 2, 118 - 134.

Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. London: Berg.

Thomas, N. 1991. Entangled objects. Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Thomas, J. 1999. Time, Culture and Identity. London: Routledge.

van der Leeuw, S. 1998. The Archaeomedes Project. Brussels: European Commission.

van der Leeuw, S. 2008. Agency, networks, past and future. In: Knappett, C.; Malafouris, L. (eds) Material Agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer. 217–47.

Van Huyssteen, J.W. 2010. Coding the nonvisible: epistemic limitations and understanding symbolic behaviour at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder, I. (ed) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 99–121.

Webmoor, T.; Witmore, C. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41, 53–70.

Wiesemann, U. G. 2011. Dicionário Kaingang-Português/Portugês-Kaingang. Curitiba: Editora Esperança.

Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wynn, T. 1993. Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In Gibson, K.R. and Ingold, T. (eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 389–406.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-10-04

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Dados de financiamento

Como Citar

Hodder, I., & Teixeira-Bastos, M. (2023). A Teoria dos Emaranhados Biossociomateriais: entrelaçamentos entre Coisas e Humanos. Revista De Antropologia, 66, e201444 . https://doi.org/10.11606/1678-9857.ra.2022.201444