Technological and non-technological trends in fashion eco-innovations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2020-0177Keywords:
Green innovation, GRI fashion Industry, Technological trendsAbstract
Purpose – The fashion industry is diverse and demands a high amount of resources and labor for its
operation. It has powerful tools that can positively impact the environment and society as a whole. In this sense,
it becomes necessary for fashion to adopt sustainable strategies quickly. One way would be the adoption of ecoinnovations by companies in the sector. The objective of this research is to identify the main eco-innovation
initiatives carried out by companies in the fashion sector and to verify what the trend is in the sector in relation
to the types of eco-innovation, whether technological or non-technological in nature.
Design/methodology/approach – To meet the objective, the sector’s sustainability reports are analyzed
based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) initiative. The method used to treat the data is content analysis.
The authors chose to use the GRI-G4 and GRI-Standards versions of the GRI structure, as they include topics
relevant to its stakeholders. The analysis based on these criteria considers 18 reports prepared by four
companies (Cia Hering, Grupo Malwee, Dudalina and Lojas Renner).
Findings – From the data analysis, it was noticed that eco-innovations of technological trends prevail in
Brazilian fashion, in the first place, those of process (24.56%), followed by eco-innovations of product (10.53%).
The pressure exerted by internal or external stakeholders will be fueled by the current scenario of sustainable
development, positively influencing the adoption of eco-innovation. This characteristic can be attributed to the
fashion sector, since technological eco-innovations overlap with non-technological ones in all the years that
make up the analysis.
Research limitations/implications – As limitations of this research, it is worth mentioning the availability
of GRIs in the fashion sector. Even considering it a step forward, noting that larger companies support the
adoption of these reports, it is important to highlight that only four companies make up the available database
(Cia Hering, Lojas Renner, Dudalina and Malwee). From the adoption of the dissemination of sustainability
reports by other organizations, the base could be expanded.
Practical implications – From this study, practical questions emerge that can contribute to managers and
companies in the Brazilian fashion sector. Initially, the focus on eco-innovations is predominantly related to the
technological component, with an emphasis on process eco-innovations. In this sense, business actions seek to
resolve the accusations normally attributed to the sector, such as the adoption of unsustainable practices. For
example, in cotton production, firms use large amounts of pesticides and water, despite the sector being
accused of not taking proper responsibility regarding sustainability related issues.
Social implications – Investment in eco-innovations indicates a positive attitude and change resulting from
pressure and the need to return the market to society’s demands for more sustainable production technologies
with less environmental impact.
Originality/value – The originality of the study lies in the systematization of a GRI analysis model applied to
measure eco-innovations in fashion. Through the applied methodology, it is possible to emphasize that ecoinnovations of technological trend prevail in the industry, first in processes and then in product development.
Downloads
References
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., Molina-García, A. & de Arroyabe, J. F. (2019). Incentives and inhibiting factors of eco-innovation in the Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 167-176.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo (2a ed.). Edições 70 LDA/Almedina Brasil.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: The Free Press.
Borini, F. M., MacLennan, M. L. F., Pereira, R. M., Pavan, K. R. & Hourneaux Jr, F. (2018). Green and social certifications make up for home market underdeveloped institutional environment? Evidences from Brazilian subsidiaries. Transnational Corporations Review, 10(4), 356-366. doi:10.1080/19186444.2018.1556518
Bossle, M. B., Dutra de Barcellos, M., Vieira, L. M. & Sauvée, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 861–872. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033
Chen, L., Tang, O. & Feldmann, A. (2015). Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.001
Chen, J., Yin, X. & Mei, L. (2018). Holistic innovation: an emerging innovation paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 1-13.
Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning 43(2-3), 354-363.
Choi, D. & Han, T.-I. (2019). Green Practices among Fashion Manufacturers: Relationship with Cultural Innovativeness and Perceived Benefits. Social Sciences, 8(5), 138.
Dangelico, R. M. & Pontrandolfo, P. (2015). Being 'green and competitive': The impact of environmental actions and collaborations on firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 413-430.
De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research policy, 41(3), 614-623.
De Morais, A. S. A., Hoeckesfeld, L., Sarquis, A. B. & Mussi, C. C. J. R. (2019). Omnichannel as strategy of innovation in youth fashion retail industry in Brazil. REMark, 18(2), 268.
Diaz-Garcia, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A. & Saez-Martinez, F.J. (2015), Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review. Innovation-Management Policy and Practice, 17(1), 6-23. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060.
Doran, J. & Ryan, G. (2016). The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Business strategy and the environment, 25(2), 102-119.
Figueiredo, P. N. (2009). Gestão da inovação: conceitos, métricas e experiências de empresas no Brasil. Livros Técnicos e Científicos.
Fundação Ellen MacArthur (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion's future. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/A-New-TextilesEconomy_Full-Report.pdf.
García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L. & Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2018). Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of cleaner production, 191, 304-317.
Grose, L. (2019). Keynote-Fashion and Sustainability: Where We Are and Where We Need To Be. J Fashion Practice, 11(3), 291-301.
Hedberg, C. J. & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate social responsibility environmental management, 10(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.38.
Horbach, J., Oltra, V. & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations—an econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Industry Innovation 20(6), 523-543.
Hroncova, V., Jana, Jaďuďová, J., Hronec, M. & Rolíková, S. (2017). Developing eco-innovation in business practice in Slovakia. Journal of Business Economics Management 18(5), 1042-1061.
Hsu, C. C., Tan, K. C. & Zailani, S. H. M. (2016). Strategic orientations, sustainable supply chain initiatives, and reverse logistics Empirical evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(1), 86-110. doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2014-0252.
Kemp, R. & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10.
Kozlowski, A., Searcy, C. & Bardecki, M. (2015). Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry: An analysis of indicators disclosed. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64(3), 377-397.
Kripka, R. M. L., Scheller, M. & Bonotto, D. D. L. (2015). Pesquisa documental na pesquisa qualitativa: conceitos e caracterização. Revista de Investigaciones UNAD, 14(2), 55-73.
Kury, B., da Rocha, A. & da Silva, J. F. (2019). Internationalization and the tale of the Cabo Frio beachwear cluster. In Contemporary Influences on International Business in Latin America (pp. 125-153). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
McKinsey Global Fashion Index. (2 de maio de 2019). Mckinsey.com. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/the-state-of-fashion.
MacLennan, M. L. F., Suter, M. B. & Spers, R. (2017). Challenges to the internationalisation of the Brazilian fashion industry. International Journal of Export Marketing, 1(4), 377-395.
Mascena, K. M. C. d., Fischmann, A. A. & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2018). Priorização de stakeholders em empresas que divulgam relatórios GRI no Brasil. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 17-32.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
NVivo11 (2016). Manual NVivo11. Acesso em 27 de março de 2021. Disponível em https://aprender.ead.unb.br/pluginfile.php/345106/mod_resource/content/0/NVivo11-Getting-Started-Guide-Plus-edition-Portuguese.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). The measurement of scientific activities: proposed guideline for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo manual, 2005. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf
Oliva, F. L., Semensato, B. I., Prioste, D. B., Winandy, E. J. L., Bution, J. L., Couto, M. H. G. & Santos, R. F. (2019). Innovation in the main Brazilian business industries: characteristics, types and comparison of innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 135-175.
Pedersen, E. R. G., Gwozdz, W. & Hvass, K. K. (2016). Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 267-284.
Porter M.E. & Van der Linde C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Sá-Silva, J. R., Almeida, C. D. D. & Guindani, J. F. (2009). Pesquisa documental: pistas teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Brasileira de História & Ciências Sociais, 1(1), 1-15.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of management review, 20(4), 936-960.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York.
Silva, L. A., Vicente, D. P. & Galina, S. V. R. (2013). Criação e desenvolvimento de produtos em empresas brasileiras internacionalizadas: um estudo comparativo no setor de moda. Revista de Negócios, 18(3), 21-36.
Sutter, M. B., Galleli, B., MacLennan, M. L. F., Polo, E. F. & Correa, H. L. (2015). Brazil's fashion and clothing industry: sustainability, competitiveness and differentiation. Latin American Journal of Management for Sustainable Development, 2(3-4), 280-295.
Sutter, M. B., MacLennan, M. L. F., Polo, E. F. & Strehlau, V. I. (2016). Diferenciação e competitividade da oferta de moda brasileira no mercado internacional. Revista de Administração Mackenzie 17(1), 165-196.
Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
Tidd, J. & Hull, F. M. (2006). Managing service innovation: the need for selectivity rather than 'best practice'. New Technology, Work Employment 21(2), 139-161.
Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L. & Davia, M. (2015). Eco-innovation by small and medium-sized firms in Europe: from end-of-pipe to cleaner technologies. Innovation 17(1), 24-40.
Thorisdottir, T. S., & Johannsdottir, L. (2019). Sustainability within fashion business models: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 11(8), 2233.
Tumelero, C., Sbragia, R. & Evans, S. (2019). Cooperation in R & D and eco-innovations: The role in companies' socioeconomic performance. Journal of cleaner production, 207, 1138-1149.
Tung, T., Koenig, H. & Chen, H.-L. (2017). Effects of green self-identity and cognitive and affective involvement on patronage intention in eco-friendly apparel consumption: A gender comparison. Sustainability, 9(11), 1977.
Utterback, J. M. & Abernathy, W. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.
Weerawardena, J. & Mavondo, F. T. (2011). Capabilities, innovation and competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1220-1223.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
