Accounting professionals and whistleblowing: a typology of the influence of institutional logics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202112830Keywords:
financial accounting, accounting professional, whistleblowing, institutional logicsAbstract
The main objective of this article is to understand how institutional logics (ILs) – family, religion, community, state, profession, organization, and capital and labor market – influence (or not) the Brazilian accounting professional in their intention to report irregularities. The study helps fill an epistemic gap by using the theory of ILs to comprehensively understand the professional in their world, in contrast with the whistleblowing studies that are generally based on behavioral theories. Most of those studies are quantitative, using the vignette technique (elaborated by researchers), which highlights the relevance of this paper, as it chooses to allow the accountants to reflect on the phenomenon and elaborate explanations for their actions and the dimensions that surround them. The main contribution lies in the theoretical advancement in accounting by extending the classic whistleblowing model, in order to socioinstitutionally recognize the individual’s reflection process (at the micro level) and the structuring elements (macro and meso levels) involved. In methodological terms, the study is qualitative and interpretative, based on content analysis (CA) through the lens of the hermeneutic circle. Standing out among the results are: (a) a typology of the influence of ILs on the accounting professional’s intention to report irregularities; (b) the differentiation of influences that favor whistleblowing or lead to the avoidance of it according to various logics; and (c) discussions about the premises that greater protection and support for the whistleblower would favor whistleblowing or, in contrast, that recognition and financial reward would be considered as factors that would not favor whistleblowing, among other aspects. The impact and applicability of the study derive from an alternative approach in epistemic-methodological terms, enabling an understanding of the socioinstitutional structure that influences whistleblowing intentions, thus allowing for the construction of mechanisms that increase the potential for whistleblowing.
Downloads
References
Agalgatti, B., & Krishna, S. (2007). Business ethics: concepts & practices. Nirali.Aldridge, A. (2010). Religião. In J. Scott., Sociologia: conceitos-chave (pp. 171-174). Zahar.Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Alleyne, P. A. (2010). The influence of individual, team and contextual factors on external auditors’ whistle-blowing intentions in Barbados. Towards the development of a conceptual model of external auditors’ whistle-blowing intentions [Tese de Doutorado], University of Bradford. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5325
Almandoz, J. (2014). Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks‘ risk exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 442-473.
Ayres, R. M., Sauerbronn, F. F., Fonseca, A. C., & Nascimento, J. C. (2018). O profissional de contabilidade e o mecanismo de denúncia em um contexto de LAC e de NOCLAR: análise comparativa de estudos internacionais e nacionais. Ambiente Contábil, 10(2), 68-90. Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Martins Fontes.
Bento, L. V. (2015). O princípio da proteção ao denunciante: parâmetros internacionais e o direito brasileiro. Novos Estudos Jurídicos, 20(2), 785-809.
Bertero, C. O. (1981). Tipologias e teoria organizacional. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 21(1), 31-38.
Biesanz, J., Biesanz, M. (1972). Introdução à ciência social. Nacional. Boghossian, P., & Williamson, T. (2020). Debating the a priori. Oxford.
Boudon, R., & Bourricaud, F. (2007). Dicionário crítico de sociologia. Ática. Bowie, N. E., & Duska, R. F. (1990). Business ethics. Prentice Hall.
Brown, A. J., Vandekerckhove, W., & Dreyfus, S. (2014). The relationship between transparency, whistleblowing, and public trust. In P. Ala’I et al., Research handbook on transparency (pp. 30-58). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cardoso, J. L., Souza, M. A., & Almeida, L. B. (2006). Perfil do contador na atualidade: um estudo exploratório. Revista Base, 3(3), 275-284.
Castro, P. R., Amaral, J. V., & Guerreiro, R. (2019). Aderência ao programa de integridade da lei anticorrupção brasileira e implantação de controles internos. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(80), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201806780 Decreto n. 8.420. (2015, 18 de março). Regulamenta a Lei nº 12.846, de 1º de agosto de 2013, que dispõe sobre a
responsabilização administrativa de pessoas jurídicas pela prática de atos contra a administração pública, nacional ou estrangeira e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/decreto/d8420.htm
Elliston, F. (1982). Anonymity and whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(3), 167-177.
Etzioni, A. (1929). A sociedade deveria articular o que é bom. In M. Hobbs et al. (Orgs.), O livro da sociologia (pp. 114-119). Globo.
Fajardo, B. A. G., & Cardoso, R. L. (2014a). A ocasião faz a denúncia? Uma abordagem multinível para os contabilistas brasileiros. Brazilian Business Review, 11(5), 25-50.
Fajardo, B. A. G., & Cardoso, R. L. (2014b). Faça o que digo, não faça o que eu faço: como aspectos individuais e relacionais influenciam as denúncias de fraudes organizacionais. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 17(1), 115-133.
Farooq, M. B. (2018). A review of Gadamerian and Ricoeurian hermeneutics and its application to interpretive accounting research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 13(3), 261-283.
Ferrari, E. L. (2003). Contabilidade geral. Impetus.Friedland, R., & Arjaliès, D.-L. (2019). X-institutional logics: Out or in? [Working Paper]. Social Science Research Network.
Gibbs, G. (2009). Análise de dados qualitativos. Artmed.Henik, E. (2015). Understanding whistle-blowing: A set-theoretic approach. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.004
Hills, S., Voronov, M., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Putting new wine in old bottles: utilizing rhetorical history to overcome stigma associated with a previously dominant logic. In S. Hills et al. Institutional logics in action (pp. 99-137). Emerald.Johnson, A. G. (1997). Dicionário de sociologia: Zahar.
Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005922701763
Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. (1999). Sociologia geral. Atlas.
Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. John Wiley & Sons. Lei n. 12.846, de 1 de agosto de 2013. (2013, 1 de agosto). Dispõe sobre a responsabilização administrativa e civil de pessoas jurídicas pela prática de atos contra a administração pública, nacional ou estrangeira, e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12846.htm
Longo, I., Meurer, A., & Oliveira, M. R. (2014). A imagem do contador pela percepção pública: um estudo sobre o nível de estereotipagem acerca desses profissionais. In Anais do Congresso UFSC de Controladoria e Finanças & Iniciação Científica em Contabilidade (p. 1-17).May, S. (2013). Introduction: ethical perspectives and practices. In S. May, Case studies in organizational communication: Ethical perspectives and practices (pp. 1-32). Sage.
Mutch, A. (2018). Practice, substance, and history: Reframing institutional logics. Academy of Management.
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382668
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective whistleblowing. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679-708. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258791
Rayner, J. (2004). Managing reputational risk: Curbing threats, leveraging opportunities. John Wiley & Sons. Resolução CFC nº 1.445/2013. (2013). Dispõe sobre os procedimentos a serem observados pelos profissionais e Organizações Contábeis, quando no exercício de suas funções, para cumprimento das obrigações previstas na Lei n.º 9.613/1998 e alterações posteriores. https://www1.cfc.org.br/sisweb/SRE/docs/RES_1445.pdf Resolução CFC nº 80/1996. (1996). Estabelece normas para Auditoria Operacional e institui modelo de Relatório de Auditoria. https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/rj/r/rio-de-janeiro/resolucao/1996/8/80/resolucao-n-80-1996-estabelece-normas-para-auditoria-operacional-e-institui-modelo-de-relatorio-de-auditoria
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Accounting theory. Thomson Learning.
Rocha, M. A. (2016). Subsídios ao debate para a implantação dos programas e whistleblower o Brasil. Revista de Doutrina da 4ª Região, 75. https://revistadoutrina.trf4.jus.br/index.htm?https://revistadoutrina.trf4.jus.br/artigos/edicao075/Marcio_Rocha.html
Sampaio, D. B., & Sobral, F. (2013). Speak now or forever hold your peace? An essay on histleblowing and its interfaces with the Brazilian culture. Brazilian Administration Review, 10(4), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922013000400002
Sauerbronn, F. F. (2009). Co-determinação e não-ação em estratégia de responsabilidade social empresarial [Tese de Doutorado]. Fundação Getulio Vargas.
Sauerbronn, F. F., & Faria, A. (2011). Agência em estratégia: conectando prática social e codeterminação. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 12(6), 49-75.
Shawver, T., & Clements, H. A. (2008). Whistleblowing: Factors that contribute to management accountants reporting questionable dilemmas. Management Accounting Quarterly,9(2), 26.
Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 4(10), 724-736. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258041
Sousa, R. G., Vasconcelos, A. F., Antunes, G. A., & Silva, J. D. (2013). Fraudes contábeis e whistleblowing: uma pesquisa empírica sobre a influência da percepção contábil do delatante. Revista Universo Contábil, 9(3), 128-142.
Taylor, E., & Thomas, J. (2012). Blowing the whistle without fear. Accounting Today, 26(5), 8.
Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press. Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenwood et al., The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (99-128). Sage.
Vasconcelos, A. F. (2015). Influência do julgamento ético, lócus de controle, clima ético organizacional e materialidade do delito sobre as intenções de whistleblowing dos auditores internos no Brasil [Tese de doutorado]. Universidade da Bahia. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Hunt, J. (2012). Journalism, accountability, and the possibilities for structural critique: A case study of coverage of whistleblowing. Journalism, 13(4), 399-416.
Weffort, E. F., Milan, J. C., & Gonçalves, R. (2018). O contador amedrontado: um estudo sobre fraude e whistleblowing. In Anais do Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós- Graduação em Administração – EnANPAD (p. 1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.
