Dynamic tensions in the budgetary system of a family business and the duality of structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202114110Keywords:
management accounting, dynamic tensions, budgetary system, family business, duality of structureAbstract
This article aimed to understand the dynamic tensions in the budgetary system of a family business based on the duality of structure perspective. The research on dynamic tensions in the budgetary system of family businesses is inconclusive. Dynamic tensions are explored in light of traditional theories, and few studies use Simons’ (1995) four levers of control. Moreover, the management control systems (MCSs) of family businesses have particularities that need to be explored. These particularities of family businesses provide different explanations for the dynamic tensions in the budgetary system. Duality of structure enables an understanding of the interaction between the structure and agents’ actions in the production and reproduction of the social order of a family business, within a context of dynamic tensions in the budgetary system. The research revealed the dynamic tensions in the budgetary system of a family business in one budgetary cycle. The findings are relevant since, based on a duality of structure perspective, they present indications that these dynamic tensions are associated with positive forces (belief and interactive control systems) in interaction with negative forces (boundary and diagnostic control systems). This is a single case study in a medium-sized family business engaged in the production and sale of foods. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and documents, and analyzed based on discursive textual analysis. The evidence suggests that the social order of the family business is produced and reproduced with the dynamic tensions that occur in the planning and control stages of the budgetary system. The study contributes to the literature on dynamic tensions in the budgetary system of a family business by addressing what they are and how these tensions occur based on the duality of structure perspective. It contributes to practice, as it enables an understanding and better management of these tensions and the achievement of budgetary goals and objectives.
Downloads
References
Acquaah, M. (2013). Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.03.002
Aoki, K. (2019). The roles of material artifacts in managing the learning-performance paradox: The kaizen case. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1266-1299.
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). Families as active monitors of firm performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.02.002
Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.010
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
Chung, L. H., & Parker, L. D. (2008). Integrating hotel environmental strategies with management control: A structuration approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(4), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.546
Conrad, L. (2005). A structuration analysis of accounting systems and systems of accountability in the privatised gas industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1045-2354(02)00212-5
Covaleski, M., Evans III, J. H., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2007). Budgeting research: Three heoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 2, 587-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)02006-2
Duller, C. (2010). Differences in management accounting between family enterprises and non-family enterprises: A statistical approach. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 3(1), 89-95.
Ekholm, B. G., & Wallin, J. (2000). Is the annual budget really dead? European Accounting Review, 9(4), 519-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180020024007
English, T. (2001). Tension analysis in international organizations: A tool for breaking down communication barriers. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(1), 58-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028928 English, T. (2003).
Negotiation as tension management: A model for business and other international transactions [Research Paper]. Flinders University.
Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2014). Structuration theory in accounting research: Applications and applicability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.10.001
Englund, H., Gerdin, J., & Burns, J. (2011). 25 years of Giddens in accounting research: Achievements, limitations and the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(8), 94-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.10.001
Frezatti, F., Relvas, T. R. S., Nascimento, A. R., Junqueira, E. R., & Bido, D. S. (2010). Perfil de planejamento e ciclo de vida organizacional nas empresas brasileiras. Revista de Administração, 45(4), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0080-2107(16)30469-1
Frow, N., Marginson, D., & Ogden, S. (2010). “Continuous” budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 444-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.003
Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Hutchinson & CO. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. University of California.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (2013). A constituição da sociedade. WMF Martins Fontes.
Gurd, B. (2008). Structuration and middle-range theory – A case study of accounting during organizational change from different theoretical perspectives. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(4), 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.10.001
Helsen, Z., Lybaert, N., Steijvers, T., Orens, R., & Dekker, J. (2016). Management control systems in family firms: A review of the literature and directions for the future. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 410-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12154
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Henttu-Aho, T. (2018). The role of rolling forecasting in budgetary control systems: Reactive and proactive types of planning. Journal of Management Control, 29(3-4), 327-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-00273-6
Hillen, C., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2020). Orçamento e ciclo de vida em empresas familiares em processo de sucessão. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 31(83), 212-227. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201909600
Kilfoyle, E., & Richardson, A. J. (2011). Agency and structure in budgeting: Thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.013
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707712
Macintosh, N. B., & Scapens, R. W. (1990). Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90028-s
Macintosh, N. B., & Scapens, R. W. (1991). Management accounting and control systems: A structuration theory analysis. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3, 131-158. Moraes, R. (2003). Uma tempestade de luz: a compreensão possibilitada pela análise textual discursiva. Ciência & Educação, 9(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132003000200004
Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1016j.aos.2009.10.005
Oro, I. M., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2019). Interface dos sistemas de controle gerencial com a estratégia e medidas de desempenho em empresa familiar. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(79), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201806490
Oro, I. M., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2020). Uso dos sistemas de controle gerencial no equilíbrio da tensão dinâmica na implementação de estratégias de inovação em empresa familiar. BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da UNISINOS, 17(2), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2020.172.05
Oyadomari, J. C. T., Frezatti, F., Mendonça, O. R., Neto, Cardoso, R. L., & Bido, D. S. (2011). Uso do sistema de controle gerencial e desempenho: um estudo em empresas brasileiras sob a perspectiva da resources-based view. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 17(2), 98-329. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-23112011000200001
Pletsch, C. S., Lavarda, C. E. F., & Lavarda, R. A. B. (2016). Sistema de controle gerencial e sua contribuição para o equilíbrio das tensões dinâmicas. Enfoque Reflexão Contábil, 35(3), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque. v39i1.51409
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School.
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
Songini, L., & Vola, P. (2015). The role of professionalization and managerialization in family business succession. Management Control, 1, 9-43.
Songini, L., Morelli, C., & Vola, P. (2018). Managerial control systems in family business: State of the art. Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 33, 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220180000033008
Steier, L. (2001). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14(4), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00353.x
Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511421665
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397-15. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196737
Uppatumwichian, W. (2012). The relationship between ERP systems and budgeting: Uncovering the limited ERP system impact on budgeting. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings, 6. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/Posters/6
Van der Kolk, B., Van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G., & Ter Bogt, H. J. (2020). How combinations of control elements create tensions and how these can be managed: An embedded case study. Management Accounting Research, 48, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100677
Van der Stede, W. A. (2001). Measuring “tight budgetary control”. Management Accounting Research, 12(1), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0149
Wanderley, C. A., & Cullen, J. (2012). Um caso de mudança na contabilidade gerencial: A dinâmica política e social. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 23(60), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-70772012000300002
Wickramasinghe, D., & Alawattage, C. (2007). Management accounting change: Approaches and perspectives. Routledge.
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, rganizations and Society,32(7-8), 757-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.
