Arbitrator’s expectations and motives regarding the expert accountant’s performance in arbitration in the light of role theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20221369.enKeywords:
accounting expertise, arbitration, expert accountant, arbitrator, role theoryAbstract
The paper sought to grasp the arbitrator’s expectations regarding the expert accountant’s performance in the arbitration arena in the light of role theory and the reasons for meeting these expectations or not. The study of arbitrator’s expectations has been poorly explored in the field of forensic accounting. This article helps to fill this gap by presenting expectations and motives that affect the arbitrator’s perception of the expert accountant’s service. The study is relevant because it grasps expectations from the arbitrator’s viewpoint (role transferrer) regarding the expert accountant’s performance (function recipient). Expectations are characterized by abilities and skills that may not be met during role performance due to conflicting or ambiguous reasons, simultaneous occurrence of two or more roles, or lack of clarity about the latter. The research aims to provide means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seek improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production. The descriptive research has been designed as a field study and a qualitative approach to data. The research participants were 15 Brazilian arbitrators. Data collection took place through interviews and they were submitted to the content analysis method and the categorical analysis technique. The results indicate that the arbitrator’s expectations are oratory, objectivity, clarity, and sticking to the technical issue, while the reasons are inter-transferrer, inter-role conflict, overload, expert’s partiality, and lack of clarity when the arbitrator transfers the role. The practical contribution lies in providing means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seeking improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.