An analysis of the relevant lawsuits in Brazilian companies: characteristics that influence the change in the probability of loss provision and contingent liabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2019.155596Keywords:
Provisions, Contingent liabilities, Litigations, Probability of lossAbstract
The aim of this research is to identify characteristics that influence the change in the probability of provisions and contingent liabilities of Brazilian companies. This has been widely observed in specific industries that disclose more information on provisions and contingent liabilities, namely: oil, gas and biofuels, non-cyclical consumption and public utility. The data consisted of 6,194 observations, of which 2,058 lawsuits were mentioned in more than one period, and there were 228 changes in the probability of loss in the period from 2010 to 2016. A logistic regression model with panel data was applied, counting on 11 explanatory variables for the change in the probability of loss, which are divided into two perspectives: (a) characteristics of the companies and, (b) characteristics of the lawsuits. The results indicate that companies listed as ‘New Market’, ADR issuers, change the audit firms, respond to environmental, labor and civil lawsuits with large amounts in dispute, and have financial materiality in terms of risk expectation regarding losses and the duration of the legal process – are more likely to affect the change in the probability of loss. Conversely, the lawsuits in the first or superior instances are more likely not to change the probability of loss.
Downloads
References
modificações trazidas pela lei no 11.638. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 49(2), 234-239. DOI: http://
dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902009000200009.
Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value.
Journal of accounting and economics, 18(3), 357-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4.
Castro, M. C. C. S., Vieira, L. K., & Pinheiro, L. E. T. (2015). Comparação do Disclosure de Contingências Ativas
e Passivas nas Empresas Brasileiras com Ações Negociadas na BM&FBOVESPA e na NYSE. Revista de
Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ, 20(2), 49-65.
Capriotti, K., & Waldrup, B. E. (2005). Miscommunication of uncertainties in financial statements: a study of
preparers and users. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 3(1), 33-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/
jber.v3i1.2733.
Comitê, D. P. C. C. (2005). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 25: Provisões. Passivos Contingentes e Ativos
Contingentes. Brasília, DF.
Daniels, R., & Flesher, D. L. (1991). The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company: an examination
of contingent liabilities of 1903–1904. Accounting Historians Journal, 18(1), 55-73. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.2308/0148-4184.18.1.55.
Doupnik, T. S., & Richter, M. (2004). The impact of culture on the interpretation of “in context” verbal probability
expressions. Journal of International Accounting Research, 3(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/
jiar.2004.3.1.1.
Du, N., & Stevens, K. (2011). Numeric-to-verbal translation of probability expressions in SFAS 5. Managerial
Auditing Journal, 26(3), 248-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111113190.
EAE Business School. (n.d.). Recuperado em Agosto, 08, 2018 de: https://www.eaeprogramas.es/
internacionalizacion/brasil-como-economia-emergente.
Farias, M. R. S. (2006). Bases conceituais e normativas para reconhecimento e divulgação do passivo contingente:
um estudo empírico no setor químico e petroquímico brasileiro. In: 6o. Congresso USP de Controladoria e
Contabilidade. São Paulo. Anais.
Firth, M. (1979). The impact of size, stock market listing, and auditors on voluntary disclosure in corporate annual
reports. Accounting and Business research, 9(36), 273-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1979.9
729168.
Gelbcke, E. R., Santos, A. D., Iudícibus, S. D., & Martins, E. (2018). Manual de contabilidade societária: aplicável
a todas as sociedades de acordo com as normas internacionais e do CPC.
Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2002). Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting. The Accounting Review,
77(2), 317-342.
Gonzalez, E. Z., & da Silva Filho, C. F. (2016). 02) Risco Legal e Companhias Abertas: Ponderações Sobre a
Importância da Avaliação do Risco Jurídico para Atuação no Mercado Mobiliário. Revista Brasileira de
Gestão e Engenharia - RBGE, (14), 20-37.
Hennes, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of contingent legal liabilities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(1),
32-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.10.005.
Holder, A. D., Karim, K. E., Lin, K. J., & Woods, M. (2013). A content analysis of the comment letters to the
FASB and IASB: Accounting for contingencies. Advances in Accounting, 29(1), 134-153. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.03.005.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and
ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-
405X(76)90026-X.
Jesus, S. S. de, & Souza, M. M. de. (2016). Impacto do reconhecimento dos passivos contingentes na situação
econômica das empresas brasileiras auditadas pelas big four. Revista de Contabilidade da UFBA, 10(2), 43-
63.
Lima, B. R. T. De, Menezes Junior, C. B. De & Rodrigues, J. M. (2017). Disclosure de Provisões, Passivos
Contingentes e Ativos Contingentes Relacionados aos Precedentes Judiciais Vinculantes. In: 3o Congresso
UNB de Contabilidade e Governança. Anais. Brasília-DF.
Losekann, V. L., dos Reis Lehnhart, E., & Pereira, R. (2018). Impacto esperado sobre o patrimônio líquido de
reavaliações de provisões para contingências, de remota para possível e de possível para provável. Revista de
Contabilidade da UFBA, 12(1), 250-270.
Macedo, F. (2018, maio, 08). A falta de segurança jurídica atrasa o Brasil. O Estadão. Recuperado em Agosto, 28,
2018, de https://politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/a-falta-de-seguranca-juridica-atrasa-o-brasil/
Moreira, M. L. (2013). Beta contábil X Beta CAPM: um estudo com as empresas dos setores regulados e não
regulados listados na BM&FBovespa. 92 p. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará,
Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Atuária e Contabilidade, Mestrado Profissional em Administração e
Controladoria, Fortaleza-CE, 2013.
Nelson, M.W., Kinney Jr., W.R. (1997), The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments.
Accounting Review, 72(2), 257-274.
Piccioni, J. L.; Sheng, H. H.; Lora, M I. (2012). Mutual fund managers stock preferences in Latin America.
International Review of Financial Analysis, (24), 38-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.07.003.
Prado, F. J. do. (2014). Análise do comportamento da divulgação das informações sobre provisões e passivos
contingentes das empresas do setor de energia elétrica listadas na BM&FBOVESPA.104f. Dissertação de
Mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP.
Ribeiro, A. de C.; Ribeiro, M. de S.; Weffort, E. F. J. (2013). Provisões, contingências e o pronunciamento CPC
25: as percepções dos protagonistas envolvidos. Revista Universo Contábil. (9)3, 38-54. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.4270/RUC.2013321.
Rosa, C. A. da. (2014). Panorama e reconfiguração das contingências passivas no Brasil. 112f. Dissertação
de Mestrado, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,
Florianópolis, SC.
Santana, B. R. dos S. (2013). Operações off-balance sheet e instrumentos híbridos: utilização pelas empresas
que compõe o IBrX-100 e sua relação com o rating e a internacionalização das empresas brasileiras. 38f.
Dissertação de Mestrado. Escola de Economia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP.
Silveira, A. D. M. da; Barros, L. A. B. de C. (2008). Determinantes da qualidade da governança corporativa das
companhias abertas brasileiras. REAd-Revista Eletrônica de Administração, (14)3.
Teixeira, C.; Silva, A. F. (2009). The interpretation of verbal probability expressions used in the IAS/IFRS: some
Portuguese evidence. Revista de Estudos Politécnicos, (12), 57-73.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
