The opportunistic approach of the Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) fails to explain choices made at OGX: An anomalous situation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2019.164412Keywords:
Accounting choices, Earnings management, Positive accounting theory, Efficient approach, Case studyAbstract
This paper has two objectives: (1) to demonstrate that the main accounting choices made by accountants and managers of OGX Company throughout its full business life cycle were not opportunistic, as often suggested by the hypothesis of Positive Accounting Theory; and (2) to demonstrate that these accounting choices may be better explained by the Theory of Corporate Scandals, by the Monitoring Hypothesis and by the Corporate Reputation Hypothesis. The research was conducted using a longitudinal case study approach, from 2006-2015, in order to identify visible accounting decisions in annual financial statements reports. It was found that the analyzed Company had the incentives to preform opportunistic accounting choices, such as the ones predicted by the PAT hypothesis and had also done through several situations in its business life cycle that could have influenced it to perform opportunistic accounting choices. However, there is no evidence that the Company ever made use of either opportunistic increasing-income accounting changes to impact their financial debt-covenants and bonus plan, or decreasing-income accounting to avoid government intervention, as suggested by the opportunistic approach of PAT hypothesis.
Downloads
References
decisions 1970-1987. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3, 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1045-
2354(92)90013-H.
Ball, R. (2013). Accounting Informs Investors and Earnings Management is Rife: Two Questionable Beliefs.
Accounting Horizons, 27(4), 847-853. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2211288.
Bos, A. de, Donker, H. (2004) Monitoring accounting changes: empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Corporate Governance, 1(1), 60-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00343.x.
Chen, K. C.W., Lee, C. J. (1995). Executive bonus plans and accounting trade-offs: The case of oil and gas
industry, 1985-86. The Accounting Review, 70(1), 91–111.
Christie, A. A., Zimmerman, J. L. (1994). Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures: corporate
control contests. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 539-566.
Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00109.x.
Cooper, D. J., Morgan, W. (2008). Case study research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 22(2),159-178. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.159.
Coffee Jr., J. C. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford Review of
Economic Policy, 21(2), 198-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri012.
Dechow, P.; Skinner, D. (2000). Earnings management: reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.2.235.
Eisenhardt, K. M (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review,
14(4), 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
Fern, R. H., Brown, B. C., Dickey, S. W. (1994). An empirical test of politically-motivated income smoothing in
the oil refining industry. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(1), 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/
jabr.v10i1.5967.
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., Vicent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and
Economics, 31, 255-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3.
Hall, S., Stammerjohan, W. W. (1997). Damage awards and earnings management in the oil industry. The
Accounting Review, 72(1), 47–65.
Han, J. C. Y., Wang, S. (1998). Political costs and earnings management of oil companies during the 1990 Persian
Gulf crisis. The Accounting Review, 73(1), 103–117.
Hendriksen, E. S, Van Breda, M. E. (1991). Accounting Theory. 5th Edition, Irwin, Homewwod, IL.
Jeanjean, T.; Stolowy, H. (2008). Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earning management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 480-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.008.
Johnson, W. B., Ramanan, R. (1988). Discretionary accounting changes from "Successful Efforts" to "Full Cost"
Methods: 1970-76. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 96-110.
Jorissen, A.; Otley, D. (2010). The management of accounting numbers: case study evidence from the ‘crash’ of
an airline. Accounting and business Research, 40(1), 3-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.96
63382.
Malmquist, D. H. (1990). Efficient contracting and the choice of accounting method in the oil and gas industry.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1), 173–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90046-7
Nobes, C. W., Stadler, C. (2014). The qualitative characteristics of financial information, and managers ́
accounting decisions: evidence from IFRS policy changes. Social Science Research Network (http://ssrn.
com/abstract=2598171).
Pincus, M.; Rajgopal, S. (2002). The interaction between accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and
gas firms. The Accounting Review, 77 (1): 127–160.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Accounting Theory. 5th Edition, South-Western Cengage Learning, London.
Robert, P. W.; Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077-1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.274.
Ronen, J., Yaari, V. (2010). Earnings management: emerging insights in theory, practice, and research. Springer
Series in Accounting Scholarship. Springer Science. New York.
Ryan, R., Scapens, R. W., Theobald, M. (2002) Research method and methodology in finance and accounting. 2nd
Edition, Thomson, London.
Scott, W. R. (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. 5th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Ontario.
Stolowy, H., Breton, G. (2003) Accounts manipulation: A literature review and proposed conceptual framework.
Working Paper. January, 2003.
Sunder, S. (1997) Theory of Accounting and Control. South-Western Publishing, Ohio.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: Second Edition: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House
Trade. Paperback Edition. New York.
Watts, R. L., Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Watts, R. L. Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: a ten year perspective. The Accounting Review
65, 131-156.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
