PERSONAL AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL NETWORKS IN SAO PAULO AND SALVADOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i92p32-45Keywords:
social networks, poverty, social vulnerability, São Paulo, Salvador.Abstract
Social networks have often been cited as key element in shaping social situations. This article discusses the social networks of poor individuals in 12 locations in the cities of São Paulo e Salvador, by comparing the patterns found. After that, it analyzes quantitatively the association between those networks, as well as the attributes of individuals, and where the social vulnerability takes place. The results indicate the importance of the types of networks and of sociability to explain situations of urban poverty.
Downloads
References
BIDART, C.; LAVENU, D. “Evolution of Personal Networks and Life Events”, in Social Networks, 27 (4), 2005, pp. 359-76.
BLOKLAND, T.; SAVAGE, M. Social Capital and Networked Urbanism. London, Basil Blackwell, 2008.
BRIGGS, X. “Social Capital and Segregation in the United States”, in D. Varady. Desegregating the City. Albany, Suny Press, 2005.
CEM – CENTRO DE ESTUDOS DA METRÓPOLE. Mapa da Vulnerabilidade Social da População da Cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, CEM/Cebrap/SAS/PMSP, 2004.
DEGENNE, A. “Tipos de Interacciones, Formas de Confiança y Relaciones”, in Redes – Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, vol. 16 (3), 2009, pp. 63-91.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. Fundamentos Sociales de las Economías Postindustriales. Barcelona, Ariel, 2000.
FISCHER, C.; SHAVIT, Y. “National Differences in Network Density: Israel and the United States”, in Social Networks, 17(2), 1995, pp. 129-45.
GROSSETI, M. "Where do Social Relations Came From?", in Social Networks,27.
HEDSTROM, P.; SANDELL, R.; STERN, C. “Meso-level Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements”, in American Journal of Sociology, 106 (1), 2000, pp. 145-72.
HEINZ, J.; LAUMANN, E.; NELSON, R.; SALISBURY, R. Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1997.
KAZTMAN, R.; RETAMOSO, A. “Spatial Segregation, Employment and Poverty in Montevideo”, in Cepal Review, 85, 2005, pp. 125-42.
KNOKE, D.; PAPPI, F.; BROADBENT, J.; TSUJINAKA, Y. Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
LONKILA, M. “The Importance of Work-related Social Ties in Post-soviet Russia: the Role of Co-workers in the Personal Networks in St. Petersburg and Helsinki”, in Connections, vol. 30(1), 2010, pp. 46-56.
MARQUES, E. Redes Sociais, Segregação e Pobreza. São Paulo, Ed. Unesp/CEM, 2010.
MARQUES, E.; TORRES, H. São Paulo: Segregação, Pobreza Urbana e Desigualdade Social. São Paulo, Ed. Senac, 2005.
MCP HERSON, M.; SMITH-LOVIN, L.; COOK, J. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks”, in Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 2001, pp. 415-44.
MISCHE, A. Partisan Publics. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008.
MOSER, C. “The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies”, in World Development, vol. 26(1), 1998, pp. 1-19.
MUSTERED, S.; MURIE, A.; KESTELLOT, C. Neighborhoods of Poverty: Urban Social Exclusion and Integration in Europe. London, Palgrave Ed., 2006.
SMALL, M. “Racial Differences in Networks: Do Neighborhood Conditions Matter?”, in Social Science Quarterly, vol. 88 (2), 2007.
. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.
WILSON, W. The Truly Disadvantage: the Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. University Chicago Press, 1987.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista USP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|
Pertence à revista. Uma vez publicado o artigo, os direitos passam a ser da revista, sendo proibida a reprodução e a inclusão de trechos sem a permissão do editor. |
